Perbandingan Konstruksi Beton Risha dan Konvensional: Tinjauan Biaya dan Waktu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/jmenara.v19i2.47849Keywords:
Beton Pracetak, RISHA, Teknologi ModularAbstract
The RISHA innovation (Simple Healthy Instant House) is a variation of precast concrete created by the Center for Research and Development (Puslitbang) for Settlements, Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing, which was released on December 20 2004. The aim of this research is to determine the comparison of building construction with technology. RISHA concrete and conventional concrete from the aspect of calculating project costs and calculating project duration. The approach in this research uses a type of research in the form of a literature study or literature study. The results of research comparing building construction using RISHA concrete technology and conventional concrete showed that the average cost difference was 7.96%, and the average difference in duration was 30.10%, superior to RISHA concrete technology.
References
Badan Standarisasi Nasional. (2015). SNI 2049:2015 tentang Semen Portland.
Badan Standarisasi Nasional. (2016). SNI 8321:2016 tentang Spesifikasi Agregat Beton.
Badan Standarisasi Nasional. (2017). SNI 2052:2017 tentang Baja Tulangan Beton.
Bertram, N., Fuchs, S., Mischke, J., Palter, R., Strube, G., dan Woetzel, L. (2019). Modular Construction: from Projects to Products. McKinsey & Company.
Herlambang, A. B., Suharwanto, Komarudin, dan Nanda, M. P. (2023). “Perbandingan Analisa Waktu dengan Biaya Pembuatan Rumah Subsidi dan Risha dengan Metode Time Cost Trade Off.” Jurnal Kajian Teknik Sipil, 8(1), 36–47.
Iqbal, M. N. M. dan Ujianto, B. T. (2021). “Alternatif Desain Rumah Tumbuh Modular Sistem Pre-Fabrikasi RISHA Alternatif Desain Rumah Tumbuh Modular Sistem Pre-Fabrikasi RISHA.” Pawon Jurnal Arsitektur, 5(1), 53–62.
Jiang, Y., Zhao, D., Wang, D., dan Xing, Y. (2019). “Sustainable Performance of Buildings Through Modular Prefabrication in the Construction Phase: a Comparative Study.” Sustainability, 11(20), 5658.
Kamali, M. dan Hewage, K. (2016). “Life Cycle Performance of Modular Buildings: a Critical Review.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 1171–1183.
Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat (PUPR). (2016). RISHA (Rumah Instan Sederhana Sehat).
Kementrian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat (PUPR). (2018). Perumahan dan Permukiman Perdesaan 04 Konstruksi Pracetak untuk Rumah Sederhana.
Mudawarisman, A. F., Triwuryanto, dan Sari, S. N. (2020). “Analisa Perbandingan Biaya Struktur Rumah Konvensional dengan RISHA di Kabupaten Magelang.” Equilib, 1(2), 19–28.
Noviyanti, E., Wibowo, K., dan Ni'am M. F. (2022). “Analisis Value Engineering Pada Proyek Perumahan Pesona Griya Asri di kabupaten Kudus.” Menara: Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 17(1), 1.
Pantouw, A. V. R., Suhani, K. R., Kamuh, D. V., Warouw, A. V., dan Peginusa, S. (2023). “Re-Desain Gedung Perpustakaan POLIMDO Modern yang Ramah Lingkungan dengan Menggunakan Beton Pracetak.” Jurnal Teknik Sipil Terapan, 5(3), 170.
Punuindoong, J. D., Makapedua, P. M., Ruata, S., Wenur, T., dan Rumbayan, R. (2022). “Perbandingan Konstruksi Bangunan Coffee Shop dengan Beton Precast dan Beton Cast in Situ.” Jurnal Teknik Sipil Terapan, 4(2), 80.
Rondonuwu, Y. G. C., Pribadi, R. A., Tutu, T. H., Rasjid, I. S., Peginusa, S., dan Rumbayan, R. (2023). “Digital Desain Minimarket dengan Metode Building Information Modelling serta Perbandingan Waktu dan Biaya RISHA dan Konvesional.” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Produk Terapan Unggulan Vokasi Politeknik Negeri Manado, 2(1), 78–87.
Salim, M. A., Siswanto, A. B., Hartono, dan Rozaq, B. (2021). “Analisis Perbandingan Waktu dan Biaya Penggunaan Teknologi RISHA dan Metode Konvensional Pada Proyek Perumahan Comparison Analysis Time and Cost of Using Risha Technology and Conventional Methods in Housing Project.” Jurnal Rekayasa Infrastruktur Hexagon, 6(2), 48–57.
Snyder, H. (2019). “Literature Review as a Research Methodology: an Overview and Guidelines.” Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
UN–Habitat. (2020). World Cities Report 2020: The Value of Sustainable Urbanization. United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
Waris, A., Meilawaty, O., dan Puspasari, V. H. (2023). “Analisis Perbandingan Biaya Struktur Pembangunan Rumah Metode RISHA dan Konvensional di Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan, Sulawesi Utara.” Jurnal Serambi Engineering, 9(1), 7631–7641.
Wimala, M., Bonardo, Perceka, W., dan Carissa (2022). “Keunggulan Kompetitif Teknologi Modular Rumah Instan Sederhana Sehat (RISHA) Jayagiri.” Arsitektura: Jurnal Ilmiah Arsitektur dan Lingkungan Binaan, 20(2), 327.
Wuni, I. Y., Shen, G. Q., dan Robert, O. (2020). “Scientometric Review of Global Research Trends on Green Buildings in Construction Journals from 1992 to 2018.” Energy and Buildings, 190, 69–85.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Putu Didik Sulistiana, Ni Komang Ayu Agustini, I Made Edi Setiawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Author retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a creative commons attribution licensethat allow others to share the work within an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication of this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangementfor the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g. acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal).
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online(e.g. in institutional repositories or on their websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published works.
