GEOPHYSICAL FORENSIC FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXPLORATION IN MUAROJAMBI, INDONESIA

Authors

  • Bambang Sugiarto Geological Engineering Magister Program, Faculty of Geological Engineering, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Raya Bandung Sumedang KM 21, Jatinangor 4536
  • Dicky Muslim Geological Engineering Magister Program, Faculty of Geological Engineering, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Raya Bandung Sumedang KM 21, Jatinangor 45363, Indonesia
  • Iyan Haryanto Geological Engineering Magister Program, Faculty of Geological Engineering, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Raya Bandung Sumedang KM 21, Jatinangor 45363, Indonesia
  • Zufialdi Zakaria Geological Engineering Magister Program, Faculty of Geological Engineering, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Raya Bandung Sumedang KM 21, Jatinangor 45363, Indonesia
  • Emy Sukiyah Geological Engineering Magister Program, Faculty of Geological Engineering, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Raya Bandung Sumedang KM 21, Jatinangor 45363, Indonesia
  • Vijaya Isnaniawardhani Geological Engineering Magister Program, Faculty of Geological Engineering, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Raya Bandung Sumedang KM 21, Jatinangor 45363, Indonesia
  • Achmad Djumarma Wirakusumah Geological Agency, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, Jalan Diponegoro No. 57 Bandung 40122, Indonesia
  • Heryadi Rachmat Geological Agency, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, Jalan Diponegoro No. 57 Bandung 40122, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/SPEKTRA.053.06

Keywords:

geophysical forensic, gumpung, ground penetrating radar, Muarojambi, Telago Rajo

Abstract

In July 2011, archaeological exploration tried to apply the physics method for the first time in Muarojambi, Indonesia. We combined physics with geosciences and called it geophysical forensic. Our method is known as Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR). GPR used high-frequency electromagnetic (EM) waves between 10-3000 MHz to imaging subsurface based on dielectric permittivity’s physical parameters. Changes in the electrical properties, rock magnetism, and water content of the material under the surface will provide a response recorded on the radargram as a function of distance to time (two-way travel time). Data processing performs to reduce the noise recorded when collecting data. We have successfully obtained four GPR lines; three lines gathered near Gumpung Temple and one line at Telago Rajo Pool. The GPR method succeeded in giving a subsurface image and possibility of the archaeological objects near the Gumpung Temple and Telago Rajo Pool.

Author Biography

Bambang Sugiarto, Geological Engineering Magister Program, Faculty of Geological Engineering, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Raya Bandung Sumedang KM 21, Jatinangor 4536

1) Geological Engineering Magister Program, Faculty of Geological Engineering, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Raya Bandung Sumedang KM 21, Jatinangor 4536;

2) Geological Agency, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, Jalan Diponegoro No. 57 Bandung

References

[1] A. M. Sadzali, “Hulu ke Hilir: Jaringan dan Sistem Perniagaan Sungai Kerajaan Srivijaya,” Paradig. J. Kaji. Budays, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 61-82, 2019.
[2] H. Santiko, “The Structure of Stupas at Muara Jambi,” Kalpataru, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 113-120, 2014.
[3] P. Wessel et al., “Generic Mapping Tools : Improved Version Released,” EOS, Trans. Am. Geophys. UNION, vol. 94, no. 45, pp. 409-410, 2013.
[4] S. A. Mangga, S. Santosa, and B. Hermanto, “Geological Map of Jambi, Sumatra. Bandung: Geological Research and Development Center,” 1993.
[5] M. F. Coffin, L. M. Gahagan, and L. A. Lawyer, “Present-day Plate Boundary Digital Data Compilation,” in UTIG Technical Report No. 174, no. 512, University of Texas Institute for Geophysics, pp. 1-5, 1998.
[6] B. Sugiarto, G. M. L. Junursyah, and I. Pratomo, “Identifikasi Objek Bawah Permukaan Menggunakan Metode,” J. Geol. dan Sumberd. Miner. / J. Geol. Miner. Resour, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 197-207, 2018.
[7] G. Leucci, “Forensic Geosciences and Geophysics: Overview,” in Advances in Geophysical Methods Applied to Forensic Investigations: New Developments in Acquisition and Data Analysis Methodologies, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 11–48, 2020.
[8] P. M. Barone, “Forensic Geophysics,” pp. 175-190, 2017.
[9] H. C. Dick et al., “Detection and characterisation of Black Death burials by multi-proxy geophysical methods,” J. Archaeol. Sci, 2015.
[10] E. Rizzo et al., “Geophysical Survey and Archaeological Data at Masseria Grasso (Benevento, Italy),” Surv. Geophys, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1201-1217, 2018.
[11] ASTM D6432-11, “Standard Guide for Using the Surface Ground Penetrating Radar Method for Subsurface Investigation,” 2011.
[12] A. Tzanis, “FastTIMES Software for Analysis of Near-Surface Geophysical Data,” April 2010, 2014.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-31

How to Cite

Sugiarto, B., Muslim, D., Haryanto, I., Zakaria, Z., Sukiyah, E., Isnaniawardhani, V., … Rachmat, H. (2020). GEOPHYSICAL FORENSIC FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXPLORATION IN MUAROJAMBI, INDONESIA. Spektra: Jurnal Fisika Dan Aplikasinya, 5(3), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.21009/SPEKTRA.053.06