Tunning Surface Hydrophilicity of PVA Nanofiber Bone Scaffolds Via Amino Acid and Nanohydroxyapatite Incorporation

Authors

  • Rohul Rizki Mubaroq Hartman Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematic and Natural Science, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Yessie Widya Sari Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematic and Natural Science, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Yusril Yusuf Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematic and Natural Science, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/SPEKTRA.111.03

Keywords:

amino-acid, bone scaffold, contact angle, electrospinning, PVA, nano-hydroxyapatite, hydrophilicity modulation

Abstract

Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) is a biodegradable and biocompatible polymer with potential use in bone tissue engineering. However, its excessively high hydrophilicity led to poor cell adhesion, limiting its suitability as a bone scaffold. This study investigates the modification of PVA nanofibers through the incorporation of negatively charged amino acids (aspartic acid, glutamic acid) and nano-hydroxyapatite (nHA) to tailor surface hydrophilicity. Electrospun nanofiber composites of Asp/PVA/nHA and Glu/PVA/nHA were fabricated with varying nHA concentrations. Higher nHA content was found to decrease hydrophilicity, whereby Asp/PVA/nHA and Glu/PVA/nHA with nHA concentration of 3.5% were within the ideal range for optimal cell adhesion and proliferation characterized by contact angle between 40o – 70o. Samples containing Asp exhibited a lower hydrophilicity compared to their respective Glu-containing counterparts, which may correlated to the difference side chain of Asp and Glu structure. Statistically significant differences (p ≤0.05) suggest that nHA and amino acids effectively modulate surface characteristics, supporting the potential of fine-tuning PVA hydrophilicity via nHA and amino incorporation for improved performance in bone tissue engineering applications.

References

X. Hu, T. Wang, F. Li, and X. Mao, “Surface modifications of biomaterials in different applied fields,” RSC Adv., vol. 13, no. 30, pp. 20495–20511, 2023, doi: 10.1039/d3ra02248j.

S. H. Kim et al., “Correlation of proliferation, morphology and biological responses of fibroblasts on LDPE with different surface wettability,” J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed., vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 609–622, 2007, doi: 10.1163/156856207780852514.

C. Sutthiwanjampa, S. Hong, W. J. Kim, S. H. Kang, and H. Park, “Hydrophilic Modification Strategies to Enhance the Surface Biocompatibility of Poly(dimethylsiloxane)-Based Biomaterials for Medical Applications,” Adv. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 10, no. 12, 2023, doi: 10.1002/admi.202202333.

H. Le, H.-N. Mai-Thi, X. Le, N. Q. Tran, C. Tu Tran, and K. Huynh, “The concentration-independence cellular effects of fibronectin adsorbed on material surfaces with different hydrophobicities,” Vietnam J. Biotechnol., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 435–444, 2022, doi: 10.15625/1811-4989/16585.

G. Strnad, N. Chirila, C. Petrovan, and O. Russu, “Contact Angle Measurement on Medical Implant Titanium Based Biomaterials,” Procedia Technol., vol. 22, pp. 946–953, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2016.01.094.

M. M. Rahman Khan and M. M. H. Rumon, “Synthesis of PVA-Based Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications: Recent Trends and Advances,” Gels, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1–34, 2025, doi: 10.3390/gels11020088.

M. Bercea, “Recent Advances in Poly(vinyl alcohol)-Based Hydrogels,” Polymers (Basel)., vol. 16, no. 14, 2024, doi: 10.3390/polym16142021.

E. Chiellini, A. Corti, S. D’Antone, and R. Solaro, Biodegradation of poly (vinyl alcohol) based materials, vol. 28, no. 6. 2003.

T. Xuan et al., “Synthetic Extracellular Matrix of Polyvinyl Alcohol Nanofibers for Three-Dimensional Cell Culture,” Funct. Biomater., vol. 15, no. 262, 2024, doi: 10.3390/jfb15090262.

S. Mohanapriya and V. Raj, “Tuning biological properties of poly (vinyl alcohol) with amino acids and studying its influence on osteoblastic cell adhesion,” Mater. Sci. Eng. C, vol. 86, no. October 2017, pp. 70–82, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.01.006.

Y. W. Sari et al., “The Effect of Polyvinyl Alcohol on the Multicomponent Biopolymer/ Hydroxyapatite/Carbonated Hydroxyapatite Composite,” Res. Sq., pp. 1–21, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-2578080/v1.

Z. Eivazi Zadeh, A. Solouk, M. Shafieian, and M. Haghbin Nazarpak, “Electrospun polyurethane/carbon nanotube composites with different amounts of carbon nanotubes and almost the same fiber diameter for biomedical applications,” Mater. Sci. Eng. C, vol. 118, no. August 2020, p. 111403, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111403.

H. Nazari et al., “Incorporation of SPION ‐ casein core ‐ shells into silk ‐ fibroin nanofibers for cardiac tissue engineering,” Cell. Biochem., vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 2981–2993, 2019, doi: 10.1002/jcb.29553.

A. Asiri, R. H. Al-Ashwal, M. H. Sani, and S. Saidin, “Effects of Electrospinning Voltage and Flow Rate on Morphology of Poly-vinyl Alcohol Nanofibers,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1372, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1372/1/012035.

G. C. Türkoğlu, N. Khomarloo, E. Mohsenzadeh, D. N. Gospodinova, M. Neznakomova, and F. Salaün, “PVA-Based Electrospun Materials—A Promising Route to Designing Nanofiber Mats with Desired Morphological Shape—A Review,” Int. J. Mol. Sci., vol. 25, no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.3390/ijms25031668.

M. Q. Khan et al., “Preparation and characterizations of multifunctional PVA/ZnO nanofibers composite membranes for surgical gown application,” J. Mater. Res. Technol., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1328–1334, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.08.013.

J. C. Ge, G. Wu, S. K. Yoon, M. S. Kim, and N. J. Choi, “Study on the preparation and lipophilic properties of polyvinyl alcohol (Pva) nanofiber membranes via green electrospinning,” Nanomaterials, vol. 11, no. 10, 2021, doi: 10.3390/nano11102514.

T. Kaur, A. Thirugnanam, and K. Pramanik, “Tailoring the in vitro characteristics of poly(vinyl alcohol)-nanohydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering,” J. Polym. Eng., vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 771–784, 2016, doi: 10.1515/polyeng-2015-0252.

A. M. Ruvinsky, T. Kirys, A. V. Tuzikov, and I. A. Vakser, “Side-chain conformational changes upon protein-protein association,” J. Mol. Biol., vol. 408, no. 2, pp. 356–365, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.02.030.

D. Tolmachev, G. Mamistvalov, N. Lukasheva, S. Larin, and M. Karttunen, “Effects of amino acid side-chain length and chemical structure on anionic polyglutamic and polyaspartic acid cellulose-based polyelectrolyte brushes,” Polymers (Basel)., vol. 13, no. 11, 2021, doi: 10.3390/polym13111789.

L.C. Xu and C. A. Siedlecki, “NIH Public Access,” Biomaterials, vol. 28, no. 22, pp. 3273–3283, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.03.032.Effects.

J. H. Lee, G. Khang, J. W. Lee, and H. B. Lee, “Interaction of Different Types of Cells on Polymer Surfaces with Wettability Gradient,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., vol. 205, pp. 323–330, 1998.

H. Chang and Y. Wang, “Cell Responses to Surface and Architecture of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds,” in Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering - Cells and Biomaterials, D. Eberli, Ed. croatia: InTech, 2011, pp. 569–588.

Y. Hussein et al., “International Journal of Biological Macromolecules Electrospun PVA / hyaluronic acid / L-arginine nano fi bers for wound healing applications : Nano fi bers optimization and in vitro bioevaluation,” Int. J. Biol. Macromol., vol. 164, pp. 667–676, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.126.

S. Santander et al., “Wettability of Amino Acid-Functionalized PSMA Electrospun Fibers for the Modulated Release of Active Agents and Its Effect on Their Bioactivity,” Pharmaceutics, vol. 15, p. 1659, 2023, doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15061659.

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Hartman, R. R. M., Sari, Y. W., & Yusuf , Y. (2026). Tunning Surface Hydrophilicity of PVA Nanofiber Bone Scaffolds Via Amino Acid and Nanohydroxyapatite Incorporation: . Spektra: Jurnal Fisika Dan Aplikasinya, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.21009/SPEKTRA.111.03