Edge Seismic Denoising: Benchmarking the Hailo-8L on Raspberry Pi 5

Authors

  • Antonia Indriyani Juniar Department of Physics Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Indonesia
  • Naura Anbiyya Faka Mursaid Department of Physics Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Indonesia
  • Ahmad Kadarisman Department of Physics Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Indonesia; Direktorat Instrumentasi dan Kalibrasi, BMKG, Jl. Angkasa I/2 Kemayoran – Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Martarizal Department of Physics Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/SPEKTRA.112.04

Keywords:

denoising, autoencoder, seismic signal, Hailo-8L, MiniSEED, Raspberry Pi 5

Abstract

Real-time seismic monitoring in urban and remote environments is increasingly challenged by strong anthropogenic noise and limited computational resources at field stations. Although deep learning-based seismic denoising methods have demonstrated promising performance, their deployment on low-power edge AI platforms for continuous onsite monitoring remains insufficiently explored. This study investigates the feasibility of implementing a Conv2D-based Denoising Autoencoder (DAE) for real-time seismic signal denoising on a Raspberry Pi 5 integrated with the Hailo-8L AI accelerator. The model was trained using synthetic noise injection on seismic waveform data from the CIKJI station to generate noisy-clean signal pairs. The deployment pipeline included signal preprocessing, Conv1D-to-Conv2D adaptation, ONNX conversion, and INT8 quantization into the Hailo Execution Format (HEF). Experimental evaluation on 21,598 seismic windows demonstrated that the Hailo INT8 implementation achieved a Pearson correlation of 0.9645 and an SNR of 14.95 dB, compared to 0.9727 and 17.08 dB obtained by CPU FP32 inference, respectively. Despite a modest degradation in denoising accuracy, the Hailo-8L significantly reduced CPU utilization from 61.4% to 14.5% and maintained stable sub-millisecond inference latency during 24-hour simulated streaming tests. These results demonstrate that edge AI accelerators provide a practical tradeoff between denoising performance and computational efficiency, supporting the development of low-power real-time seismic monitoring systems for onsite deployment in resource-constrained environments. This study provides the first empirical characterization of NPU-accelerated seismic denoising under continuous real-time streaming conditions, establishing practical benchmarks for edge AI deployment in resource-constrained seismic monitoring networks.

References

Hailo Technologies Ltd, “Hailo-8/Hailo-8L AI Accelerator Datasheet,” URL: https://hailo.ai/products/hailo-8l.

W. Zhu, S. M. Mousavi, and G. C. Beroza, “Seismic Signal Denoising and Decomposition Using Deep Neural Networks,” Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2926772.

J. Chen et al., “SelfDenoiser: Self-supervised Seismic Signal Denoiser for Continuous and Contactless Cardiac Monitoring,” Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., vol. 9, no. 4, 2025, doi: 10.1145/3770701.

D. Liu, Z. Deng, C. Wang, X. Wang, and W. Chen, “An Unsupervised Deep Learning Method for Denoising Prestack Random Noise,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 19, 2022, doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2020.3019400.

S. M. Mousavi and G. C. Beroza, “Machine Learning in Earthquake Seismology,” Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, vol. 51, pp. 105–129, 2023, doi: 10.1146/annurev-earth-071822-100323.

A. Steinberg, P. Gaebler, G. Hartmann, J. Lehr, and C. Pilger, “Deep Neural Networks Based Denoising of Regional Seismic Waveforms and Impact on Analysis of North Korean Nuclear Tests,” Pure Appl. Geophys., vol. 182, pp. 4977–4997, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s00024-024-03491-3.

S. Zhang, G. Wang, L. Lu, M. Wei, X. Qin, and L. Zhang, “TF-UNet: a time–frequency feature network for seismic noise attenuation using hybrid synthetic–field data,” Journal of Supercomputing, vol. 81, no. 18, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11227-025-08113-w.

J. Li, D. Trad, and D. Liu, “Robust seismic data denoising via self-supervised deep learning,” Geophysics, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. V437–V451, 2024, doi: 10.1190/geo2023-0762.1.

M. Ding, Y. Zhou, and Y. Chi, “Seismic signal denoising using Swin-Conv-UNet,” J. Appl. Geophy., vol. 223, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2024.105355.

G. P. Pereira and M. Z. Chaari, “A Look into the Performance of the Raspberry Pi AI HAT+ for Computer Vision Applications,” in Proceedings of the 2025 11th International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing, ICCSP 2025, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2025, pp. 1620–1625. doi: 10.1109/ICCSP64183.2025.11089235.

D. Minott, S. Siddiqui, and R. J. Haddad, “Benchmarking Edge AI Platforms: Performance Analysis of NVIDIA Jetson and Raspberry Pi 5 with Coral TPU,” in Conference Proceedings - IEEE SOUTHEASTCON, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2025, pp. 1384–1389. doi: 10.1109/SoutheastCon56624.2025.10971592.

A. Kadarisman, I. Fachruddin, S. Soekirno, H. Andi Nugraha, and B. Heryanto Rusanto, “Early Detection of Seismic Signal Anomalies Using Raspberry Pi 5 and Lightweight Machine Learning Models,” Prosiding IPS dan Seminar Nasional Fisika, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 107–114, 2026, doi: 10.21009/03.1401.FA14.

A. Burzynska, K. Abratkiewicz, and M. J. Mendecki, “U-Net-Based Raw Data-Driven Approach for Seismic Signal Processing and Spectrogram Segmentation,” IEEE Sens. J., vol. 25, no. 24, pp. 44351–44362, 2025, doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2025.3625057.

P. Vincent, H. Larochelle, Y. Bengio, and P.-A. Manzagol, “Extracting and Composing Robust Features with Denoising Autoencoders.” in Proc. 25th Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. (ICML), Helsinki, Finland, 2008, pp. 1096–1103

N. Iqbal, “DeepSeg: Deep Segmental Denoising Neural Network for Seismic Data,” IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 3397–3404, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3205421.

W. Zhu and G. C. Beroza, “PhaseNet: A deep-neural-network-based seismic arrival-time picking method,” Geophys. J. Int., vol. 216, no. 1, pp. 261–273, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1093/gji/ggy423.

S. M. Mousavi, W. L. Ellsworth, W. Zhu, L. Y. Chuang, and G. C. Beroza, “Earthquake transformer—an attentive deep-learning model for simultaneous earthquake detection and phase picking,” Nat. Commun., vol. 11, no. 1, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17591-w.

W. Zhu et al., “QuakeFlow: a scalable machine-learning-based earthquake monitoring workflow with cloud computing,” Geophys. J. Int., vol. 232, no. 1, pp. 684–693, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1093/gji/ggac355.

M. Beyreuther, R. Barsch, L. Krischer, T. Megies, Y. Behr, and J. Wassermann, “ObsPy: A python toolbox for seismology,” Seismological Research Letters, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 530–533, May 2010, doi: 10.1785/gssrl.81.3.530.

Z. Geng, Y. Wang, W. Pan, C. Yu, Z. Bai, and H. Zhang, “Real-time discrimination of earthquake signals by integrating artificial intelligence technology into IoT devices,” Commun. Earth Environ., vol. 6, no. 1, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s43247-025-02003-y.

J. Li et al., “A real-time AI-assisted seismic monitoring system based on new nodal stations with 4G telemetry and its application in the Yangbi MS 6.4 aftershock monitoring in southwest China,” Earthquake Research Advances, vol. 2, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.eqrea.2021.100033.

W. Wang et al., “Accelerating three-dimensional seismic wave simulations on ARM using a hybrid half-precision and scalable vector extension approach,” Geophys. J. Int., vol. 244, no. 2, 2026, doi: 10.1093/gji/ggaf496.

B. Jacob et al., “Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inference.” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2018, pp. 2704–2713.

H. Hu, “A Review of Joint Optimization Methods for Neural Network Compression,” International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 118–124, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.62051/ijcsit.v8n3.11.

T. M. Khan, Q. E. Ul Haq, S. Iqbal, and T. A. Soomro, “Edge-based artificial intelligence: Understanding the evolution of hardware and software and future trends,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 174, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2026.114526.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-30

How to Cite

Juniar, A. I., Mursaid, N. A. F., Kadarisman, A., & Martarizal. (2026). Edge Seismic Denoising: Benchmarking the Hailo-8L on Raspberry Pi 5. Spektra: Jurnal Fisika Dan Aplikasinya, 11(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.21009/SPEKTRA.112.04