PROTON DRIPLINE FOR ISOTONE N = 18, 20, AND 22 USING MODIFIED RELATIVISTIC MEAN FIELD (MRMF) MODEL
Determining the position of one- and two-proton dripline for isotone of N = 18, 20, and 22 has been studied through Modified Relativistic Mean Field (MRMF). The model exemplifies three impacts, namely isovector-isoscalar coupling, tensors, and electromagnetic exchange through five parameter set variations. The position of one- and two-proton dripline for the isotones is predicted by applying two methods, which are two-proton separation energy, and Fermi energy. The research shows that the prediction of one- and two-proton dripline for isotone of N = 18, and N = 20 is positioned at Z = 22 and Z = 26 consecutively. Then, the prediction of one- and two-proton dripline for isotone of N = 22 has two positions, Z = 26 and Z = 28. The calculation result indicates that the position prediction for isotone of N = 18, N = 20, and N = 22 is following the research result conducted by Nazarewicz with RMF+NLSH model . Meanwhile, isovector-isoscalar coupling, tensors, and electromagnetic exchange do not affect massively for the position prediction of two-proton dripline. However, the three methods affect one-proton dripline.
 E. T. Balbuena, “Hartree-Fock Bogoliubov Theory,” Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov Calculations for Nuclei Far From Stability, Nashville: Tennessee, 2003.
 J. Meng et al., “Relativistic Continuum Hartree Bogoliubov Theory for Ground-State Properties of Exotic Nuclei,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 57 (470–563), 2006.
 J. P. Diningrum, “Dripline dalam Model Modified Relativistic Mean Field (MRMF),” M. S. Thesis, Departemen Fisika Murni dan Terapan, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia, 2015.
 M. Thoennessen, “Reaching the Limits of Nuclear Stability,” Institute of Physics Publishing, England, Rep. Prog. Phys 67, 2004.
 S. Goriely, “The R-Process Nucleosynthesis: A Continued Challenge for Nuclear Physics,” Nucl. Phys. A 718 (287c – 294c), 2003.
 B. K. Agrawal, A. Sulaksono, P. G. Reinhard, Nucl. Phys. A 882, 2012.
 A. Sulaksono, Int. J. of Modern Physics 57 (1983-2010), 2011.
 G. Saxena, D. Singh, “Study of Neutron Magic Drip-Line Nuclei Within Relativistic Mean-Field Plus BCS Approach,” Int. J. of Modern Physics E 22.
 H. L. Yadav, M. Kaushik, H. Toki, “ Description of Drip-Line Nuclei Within Relativistic Mean Field Plus BCS Approach,” Int. J. Modern Physics E 13 (647), 2004.
 V. N. Tarasov et al, Int. J. Modern Physics E 17 (1273-1291), 2008.
 M. Thoennessen, “Reaching the Limits of Nuclear Stability,” Rep. Prog. Phys 67 (1187-1232), 2004.
 G. Audi, A. H. Wapstra, C. Thibault, “The AME2003 Atomic Mass Evaluation (II) Tables, Graphs and References,” Nuclear Physics A 729 (337-676), 2003.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
SPEKTRA: Jurnal Fisika dan Aplikasinya allow the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions. SPEKTRA: Jurnal Fisika dan Aplikasinya CC-BY or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, SPEKTRA: Jurnal Fisika dan Aplikasinya recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
SPEKTRA: Jurnal Fisika dan Aplikasinya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.