Relationship between Coaches’ Leadership Style and Athletes’ Satisfaction toward Coach and Sports Performance Satisfaction at National and Provincial Levels

Authors

  • Dinda Pinkan Melati Sports science study program, Faculty of sports and health education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudi No.229, Isola, Kec. Sukasari, Kota Bandung, Jawa Barat 40154, Indonesia
  • Agus Rusdiana Sports science study program, Faculty of sports and health education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudi No.229, Isola, Kec. Sukasari, Kota Bandung, Jawa Barat 40154, Indonesia
  • Iwa Ikhwan Hidayat Sports science study program, Faculty of sports and health education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudi No.229, Isola, Kec. Sukasari, Kota Bandung, Jawa Barat 40154, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/GJIK.164.07

Keywords:

coaching leadership style, athlete satisfaction, performance satisfaction , SPOBNas SPOBDA

Abstract

This study aims to determine the relationship between coaches’ leadership style and athletes’ satisfaction toward their coach and sports performance satisfaction among junior athletes at the national and provincial levels in West Java. The research employed a quantitative descriptive approach with an associative survey design. The sample consisted of 47 athletes enrolled in the Sentra Pembinaan Olahragawan Berbakat Nasional (SPOBNas) and Satuan Pendidikan Olahragawan Daerah (SPOBDA) of West Java, selected through purposive sampling. Research instruments included the Leadership Scale for Sports (LSS), Satisfaction Scale for Athletes (SSA), and Athlete’s Subjective Performance Scale (ASPS). Data were analyzed using Spearman’s Rank correlation test with a significance level of 0.05. The results revealed a strong and significant positive relationship between the coach’s leadership style and athletes’ satisfaction toward the coach (rₛ = 0.684; p < 0.01), but no significant relationship between leadership style and satisfaction toward sports performance (rₛ = 0.151; p > 0.05). These findings indicate that coaches’ leadership plays a crucial role in shaping athletes’ interpersonal satisfaction, whereas performance satisfaction is more influenced by internal factors such as motivation and personal experience. The study highlights the importance of adopting adaptive, participative, and humanistic leadership styles in the coaching of young athletes.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Caliskan, Gokhan, and Hacer Ozge Baydar. 2016. “Satisfaction Scale For Athlete (SSA): A Study Of Validity And Reliability.” European Scientific Journal, ESJ 12(14): 13. doi:10.19044/esj.2016.v12n14p13.

Castillo, Desiree B, Martina Alexandria, V Balibay, Jhuzel M Alarcon, Justine M Picar, Raniel R Lampitoc, Ma Crizandra Baylon, and Allen A Espinosa. 2014. “Autocratic and Participative Coaching Styles and Its Effects on Students’ Dance Performance.” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research 3(1): 32–44.

Chelladurai, P., and S.D. Saleh. 1980. “Dimensions of Leader Behavior in Sports: Development of a Leadership Scale. Journal of Sport Psychology, 2(1), 34–45.” Leadership: 34–45.

Ferguson, James. 2022. “Establishing Sports Systems : A Practical Approach.” : 75–98. doi:10.4236/jss.2022.105007.

Hani, Nur, Syazwani Bakri, Syazwan Najmi Mashuri, Kalthum Mohd Mokhtar, and Muhammad Wafi A Rahman. 2022. “Relationship between Coach Leadership Styles and Athletes ’ Satisfaction at UITM Seremban.” 12(7): 1221–28. doi:10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i7/13905.

Jin, Hao, Seungmo Kim, Adam Love, and Yun Jin. 2022. “Effects of Leadership Style on Coach-Athlete Relationship , Athletes ’ Motivations , and Athlete Satisfaction.” (December): 1–14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012953.

Jowett, S., and I. M. Cockerill. 2003. “Olympic Medallists’ Perspective of the Althlete-Coach Relationship.” Psychology of Sport and Exercise 4(4): 313–31. doi:10.1016/S1469-0292(02)00011-0.

Lochbaum, Marc, Cassandra Sisneros, Sydney Cooper, and Peter C Terry. 2023. “Pre-Event Self-Efficacy and Sports Performance : A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.”

Mageau, Geneviève A., and Robert J. Vallerand. 2003. “The Coach-Athlete Relationship: A Motivational Model.” Journal of Sports Sciences 21(11): 883–904. doi:10.1080/0264041031000140374.

Nahum, Ohad. 2016. “Athlete ’ s Subjective Performance Scale (ASPS).” ResearchGate (July): 5–6. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.15985.51048.

Ntomali, Stavroula, Maria Psychountaki, Miltiades Kyprianou, and Chrysoula Chairopoulou. 2017. “The Moderation Effect of Athletic Maturity on the Association between Perceived Leadership Behavior and Athlete Satisfaction.” International Journal of Psychological Studies 9(4): 24. doi:10.5539/ijps.v9n4p24.

Ouyang, Yi, Ping Chao Lee, and Ling Mei Ko. 2023. “A Systematic Review of the Development of Sport Policy Research (2000–2020).” Sustainability (Switzerland) 15(1): 1–22. doi:10.3390/su15010389.

Rahadian, Adi, and Amung Ma. 2021. “SPORT POLICY INDONESIA: ELITE SPORT DEVELOPMENT ASEAN Journal of Sports for Development and Peace.” ASEAN Journal of Sport for Development and Peace 1(1): 15–24.

Shrinivasa, S. 2018. “Role of Physical Education and Sports in Nation Building.” 5(2): 8–9.

Soto Garcia, Diego, Juan Antonio García Herrero, Rodrigo Jesús Carcedo, and Mario Sánchez García. 2021. “The Impact of an Authentic Sports Leadership Program for Coach.” Frontiers in Psychology 12(June): 1–11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701134.

Sugiyono. 2020. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D.

Wijayanti, Ni Putu Nita, Tomoliyus, Abdul Alim, S. Wedi, Wayan Artanayasa, Ketut Sudiana, Endang Rini Sukamti, et al. 2024. “The Influence of Coaches’ Behavior on Achievement Motivation and Performance of Riau Athletes.” Sport TK 13: 1–13. doi:10.6018/sportk.564811.

Zhang, Rong, and Yong-taek Rhim. 2024. “Behavioral Sciences The Effect of Coach – Athlete Relationships on Motor Behaviour in College Athletes — Mediating Effects of Psychological Needs.”

Downloads

Published

2025-10-25

How to Cite

Pinkan Melati, D., Rusdiana, A., & Hidayat, I. I. (2025). Relationship between Coaches’ Leadership Style and Athletes’ Satisfaction toward Coach and Sports Performance Satisfaction at National and Provincial Levels. Gladi : Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 16(04), 549–560. https://doi.org/10.21009/GJIK.164.07