CONTEXTUAL AUTHENTICITY AND MULTIMODAL MEANING CONSTRUCTION IN WORKPLACE CARBON-NEUTRAL CAMPAIGNS: A PSYCHOLINGUISTIC STUDY OF GENERATION Z EMPLOYEES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/ishel.v2i1.69017Keywords:
contextual authenticity, multimodal psycholinguistics, Generation Z , workplace sustainability communication, Carbon Neutral campaignAbstract
Corporate sustainability campaigns increasingly employ multimodal communication to promote Carbon Neutral (CN) initiatives, yet limited research has examined how Generation Z employees construct meaning from these messages in workplace settings. This study investigates Generation Z employees' perceptions of a Carbon Neutral campaign video from a psycholinguistic perspective. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed in a Japanese multinational manufacturing company in Indonesia. Data were collected through multimodal discourse analysis, pre- and post-campaign surveys involving 89 employees, and semi-structured interviews with Generation Z employees. The findings indicate that authentic workplace representations, including real employees and production settings, generate stronger cognitive engagement than animated or AI-generated content. Educational background also influences meaning construction, with university graduates demonstrating conceptual reasoning, while high school graduates tend to adopt procedural reasoning. Although the campaign significantly improved participants' understanding of Carbon Neutral concepts, it produced only limited behavioral change, functioning primarily as an awareness reinforcement mechanism. This study highlights contextual authenticity as a key psycholinguistic factor in multimodal meaning construction and suggests that workplace sustainability campaigns should integrate authentic contexts with participatory communication strategies to enhance Generation Z engagement.
References
D’Acunto, L. (2025). The Gen Z attitude–behavior gap in sustainability-framed communication. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 102. https://doi.org/102312
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Deloitte. (2024). 2024 Gen Z and Millennial Survey. Deloitte Insights.
Du, H., & Cheong, Y. R. (2025). Beyond the scenic view: A multimodal discourse analysis of sustainable tourism imaginaries on TikTok in Anhui, China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/12, 41599-025-05015-3
Francis, T., & Hoefel, F. (2018). True Gen: Generation Z and its implications for companies. McKinsey & Company.
International Energy Agency. (2023). No Title. Net Zero Roadmap: A Global Pathway to Keep the 1.5°C Goal in Reach. IEA.
IPCC. (2023). : Synthesis Report. IPCC. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report.
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia Learning ( (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford University Press.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C.
Shamim, R. (2023). Impact of multimodal digital media communication on Generation Z’s literacy practices. Advances in Education and Social Science Research Journal, 13(2), 99–110.
United Nations. (2015). . Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dudung Sahdu, Zainal Rafli, Muhammad Kamal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.