VISUAL MEANING-MAKING IN SIGNAGE TRANSLATION: A MULTIMODAL ANALYSIS OF INDONESIAN–ENGLISH PUBLIC SIGNS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/ishel.v2i1.69466Keywords:
visual meaning-making, multimodal translation, public signage, image-text relation, translation strategyAbstract
Public signage constitutes a multimodal text in which images and verbal language jointly construct meaning for a linguistically diverse audience. This study investigates how visual meaning-making operates in the Indonesian-to-English translation of public signage, focusing on how pictorial elements support, reinforce, or independently convey meaning across languages. Using multimodal discourse analysis grounded in Kress and van Leeuwen's Social Semiotic framework, three bilingual public signs from restroom and building environments in Indonesia were examined, comprising instructional signs pairing pictograms with bilingual text and a directional-cautionary sign combining an evacuation icon with a belongings-security icon. The analysis focuses on the intersemiotic relationship between image and text and how this relationship is maintained or renegotiated in translation. Findings indicate that images often bear communicative weight equal to, or greater than, the verbal text, allowing translators to prioritize brevity while relying on the image to sustain comprehension. Strategies such as omission, condensation, and functional equivalence emerge as made possible by the semiotic support of images. This study contributes to translation studies by foregrounding visual meaning-making in signage translation and offers implications for translators and signage designers in bilingual public spaces.
References
Anstey, M., & Bull, G. (2010). Helping teachers to explore multimodal texts. Curriculum Corporation.
Backhaus, P. (2007). Linguistic landscapes: A comparative study of urban multilingualism in Tokyo. Multilingual Matters.
Barthes, R. (1977). Image, music, text (S. Heath, Trans.). Fontana Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Gorter, D. (Ed.). (2006). Linguistic landscape: A new approach to multilingualism. Multilingual Matters.
International Organization for Standardization. (2011). ISO 7010: Graphical symbols—Safety colours and safety signs—Registered safety signs. ISO.
Jewitt, C. (2009). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. Routledge.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Machali, R. (2012). Case studies in translation: Theories and practice. Kata Kita.
Newmark, P. (1988). A textbook of translation. Prentice Hall.
Reiss, K., & Vermeer, H. J. (2014). Towards a general theory of translational action (C. Nord, Trans.). Routledge.
Royce, T. D. (2007). Intersemiotic complementarity: A framework for multimodal discourse analysis. In T. D. Royce & W. Bowcher (Eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse (pp. 63–109). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Vinay, J.-P., & Darbelnet, J. (2000). A methodology for translation. In L. Venuti (Ed.), The translation studies reader (pp. 84–93). Routledge. (Original work published 1995)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ichwan Suyudi, Ahmad Juma Khatib Nur Ali, Agung Prasetyo Wibowo, Dian Wulandari, Rafika Zahra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.