ANALISIS RUGI-RUGI HEAT RATE PLTU BANTEN 3 LONTAR AKIBAT DEVIASI PARAMETER PADA KONDISI AKTUAL MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS GAP
Heat Rate Losses Analysis of Banten 3 Lontar PLTU due to Deviation Parameter on Actual Condition using Gap Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/JKEM.9.1.2Keywords:
Deviation Analysis, Heat Rate Losses, Actual Condition, Deviation ParameterAbstract
Steam power plant (PLTU) is one type of energy conversion technology to generate electricity from fossil materials. The performance of a PLTU unit will begin to decline as the unit ages. In addition to age, performance degradation can also be caused by deviation of operating parameters, which can cause heat rate losses. The purpose of this study is to determine the performance of PLTU Banten 3 Lontar unit 2 by analyzing heat rate losses due to parameter deviations according to actual conditions and calculating cost savings and possible improvements. The research methodology used is an evaluation method where the actual data of operating parameters will be compared with the baseline data. The comparison will produce a deviation value, which is then used to obtain the value of heat loss, cost loss, and improvement recommendations for the plant. Baseline data is obtained from the interpolation equation of commissioning testing at 3 different variation loads. From the study, it is known that there was an increase in Nett Plant Heat Rate (NPHR) with an average of 561 kCal / kWh. The increase in NPHR occurred due to heat rate losses, where the decrease in turbine HP efficiency was the main cause, with an average loss of 87.96 kCal / kWh or 24.53% of total losses. Assuming that all heat rate losses during testing can be corrected, the average potential energy savings per day is 8,604,802 kCal/kWh, while the average cost savings are Rp1,534,046,000/month.
References
[2] A. H. Sahid and D. Hendrawati, “Analisa Heat Rate dengan Variasi Beban pada PLTU Paiton Baru (Unit 9),” EKSERGI: J. Tek. Energi, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 23–28, 2014.
[3] M. Syukrillah, K. H. Khwee, and A. Hiendro, “Analisis Perhitungan Efisiensi Energi di Sistem Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Biomassa (PLTBM) PT. Harjohn Timber Kubu Raya,” J. Tek. Elektro Univ. Tanjungpura, vol. 2, no. 1, 2019.
[4] F. Anagra, “Audit Energi & Peluang Penghematan Energi,” JTE: J. Tek. Elektro, Univ. Mercu Buana, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 32–38, 2020.
[5] H. B. P. Parapa, “Dampak Perubahan Parameter Closed Feedwater Heater terhadap Heat Rate Losses pada PLTU Kapasitas 110 MW,” CYCLOTRON: J. Tek. Elektro, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2021.
[6] M. R. Fahlevy, D. Mardiansah, and D. P. Jannus, “Analisa Performa PLTGU Kapasitas 740 MW terhadap Pola Operasi dan Pembebanan Menggunakan Heat Rate Gap Analysis,” in Prosiding Sem. Nas. Tek. Mes. PNJ, pp. 1199–1207, 2019.
[7] J. Tsou and F. Daniel, Heat Rate Improvement Reference Manual. 1998.
[8] N. Maulana Wardoyo, E. Prabowow, and Nasikin, “Analisis Air Leakage Terhadap Unjuk Kerja Air Preheater A Sebelum dan Sesudah Overhaul di PLTU Adipala 1 X 660 MW PT. PLN (Persero),” J. Power Plant, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 110–119, 2020.
[9] N. K. Gothwal, A. K. Mishra, and S. K. Mehar, “Performance Analysis of Air Pre-heater,” International J. of Trend in Res. and Dev., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 526–528, 2018.
[10] V. Medica-Viola, V. Mrzljak, N. Anđelić, and M. Jelić, “Analysis of Low-Power Steam Turbine with One Extraction for Marine Applications,” Nase More: International J. of Maritime Science and Tech., vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 87–95, 2020.
[11] E. Saputro and A. Mursadin, “Analisis Efisiensi Turbin Uap Unit 1 di PT. PJB UBJOM PLTU Pulau Pisau Kalimantan Tengah,” JTAM Rotary : J. Tugas Akhir Mahasiswa Rotary, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 57–67, 2021.
[12] A. Setyono and S. Novianto, “Penerapan Interpolasi Linier untuk Deteksi Garis Lurus pada Citra Gambar,” J. Techo.COM : Tekno. dan Informasi, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 143–149, 2013.
