ANALISIS KEBUTUHAN FASILITAS INSTRUKTUR RUANG TERBUKA PUBLIK DI TEPIAN SUNGAI MUSI : Studi Kasus : Pelataran Tepian Sugai Musi di Kawasan Kampung Kapitan 7 Ulu Palembang

Mita Hargianti

doi:10.21009/jpensil.v10i3.23003

Authors

Mita Hargianti Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Teknik Serasan Muara Enim

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/jpensil.v10i3.23003

Keywords:

Facilities, Public Open Spaces

Abstract

Abstrak

Keberadaan ruang terbuka publik ditepian sungai Musi, Palembang belum dapat dimanfaatkan secara optimal, seperti area pelataran 7 Ulu di Kawasan Kampung Kapitan yang sepi pengunjung. Pemanfaatan fungsi tepian sungai menjadi ruang terbuka publik tidak dibarengi dengan pembangunan fasilitas infrastruktur yang memadai. Melalui penelitian ini akan dikaji mengenai kebutuhan fasilitas, tingkat pelayanan dan nilai ekonomis pengembangan fasiltas di area pelataran 7 Ulu. Untuk dapat mengetahui apa saja yang perlu ditingkatkan, diperlukan pengamatan terhadap setting fisik dan aktivitas, pembobotan fasilitas eksisting berdasar kriteria waterfront design character dengan metode skala likert, analisis tingkat pelayanan pelataran dan kebutuhan fasilitas dengan metode level of service. Nilai investasi dari fasilitas yang ditambahkan dianalisis menggunakan net present value, payback periods, internal rate of return dan depresiasi. Dari analisis nilai investasi diketahui bahwa perencanaan fasilitas dermaga wisata, kulinery, papan iklan menjadikan perencanaan fasilitas 7 Ulu layak investasi. Peningkatan terhadap standar pelayanan umum seperti pencapaian menuju pelataran, fasilitas-fasilitas penunjang dan keamanan musti kontekstual dengan karakter kawasan sehingga penataan pelataran dapat mendukung kawasan pelestarian 7 Ulu.

Kata kunci: Fasilitas, Ruang Terbuka Publik

Abstract

The existence of public open space on the banks of the Musi river, Palembang has not been used optimally, such as the 7 Ulu courtyard area in the Kapitan Village area which is empty of visitors. Utilization of the function of river banks into public open spaces is not accompanied by the development of adequate infrastructure facilities. Through this research, it will be studied about the need for facilities, service levels and the economic value of developing facilities in the courtyard area of 7 Ulu. To be able to find out what needs to be improved, it is necessary to observe the physical setting and activities, the weighting of the existing facilities based on the waterfront design character criteria using the Likert scale method, analysis of the level of service in the yard and the need for facilities using the level of service method. The investment value of the added facilities was analyzed using net present value, payback periods, internal rate of return and depreciation. From the analysis of the investment value, it is known that the planning of tourist pier facilities, culinary, and billboards makes the planning of the 7 Ulu facility worthy of investment. Improvement of public service standards such as reaching the courtyard, supporting facilities and security must be contextual with the character of the area so that the arrangement of the courtyard can support the 7 Ulu conservation area

Keywords: Facilities, Public Open Spaces

References

Agung, P., & Yuesti, A. (2019). METODE PENELITIAN BISNIS KUANTITATIF DAN KUALITATIF (M. Dr. I Nengah Suardhika, SE. (ed.); Pertama, Vol. 1). CV. Noah Aletheia.
Anggriani. N. (2011). Ruang Terbuka Hijau Di Perkotaan (1st ed.). Yayasan Humaniora.
Carr Stephen, Mark, F., Rivlin, L. G., & Stone, A. M. (1992). Public Space. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com.my/books?hl=en&lr=&id=pjo4AAAAIAAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=Carr,+S.,+M.+Francis,+L.+G.+Rivlin,+and+A.+M.+Stone&ots=eytcXN3z66&sig=FkOfaLF5W6e2OB5UE0lCIahqe78&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Deni Sunaryo, S. (2021). MANAJEMEN KEUANGAN PERTAMA (Petama). CV.Penerbit Qiara Media.
Hakim, R. (2003). Komponen Perancangan Arsitektur Lansekap: Prinsip - Unsur dan Aplikasi Disain (1st ed.). Bumi Aksara.
Hantono, D. (2017). Pola Aktivitas Ruang Terbuka Publik Pada Kawasan Taman Fatahillah Jakarta. Jurnal Arsitektur KOMPOSISI, 11(6), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.24002/jars.v11i6.1360
Inskeep, E. (1991). Tourism Planning: An Integrated and Sustainable Development Approach - Edward Inskeep - Google Buku. New York : Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Irfandi. (2017). Pengaruh Kualitas Fisik Ruang Terbuka Publik Aktif Perkotaan terhadap Kualitas Hidup Masyarakat. Temu Ilmiah Ikatan Peneliti Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia (IPLBI), A023–A030. https://doi.org/10.32315/ti.6.a023
Jeffrey Heller et al. (2004). Waterfront Design & Access - An Element Of The Waterfront Land Use Plan. In The Port of San Francisco and the San Francisco Planning Department with the guidance of the Waterfront Urban Design Technical Advisory Committee. https://sfport.com/waterfront-design-and-access-element
Notanubun, R. (2017). Kajian Pengembangan Konsep Waterfront City di Kawasan Pesisir Kota Ambon. Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah Dan Kota, 13(2), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v13i2.15836
Pattiapon, M. L. (2021). Ekonomi Teknik. In Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents (Pertama). WIDINA BHAKTI PERSADA BANDUNG (Grup CV. Widina Media Utama).
Putu, P. I. (2020). Kualitas Ruang Terbuka Publik Di Kawasan Taman Kota Tabanan. Space, 7(2), 145–156.

Sekaran, U. (2003). Research and Markets: Research Methods for Business - A Skill Building Approach. In John Wiley & Sons (Fourth). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17506200710779521
Soeharto, I. (1999). Manajemen Proyek (2nd ed.). Erlangga. https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.60.674
Sutjipto, E., & Semarang, U. (2019). Intermediate accounting ii (Issue October). FE USM.
Tjahjono. H. (2012). Analisis Potensi Dan Masalah Pariwisata Di Kelurahan Kandri. Forum Ilmu Sosial, 37(2), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.15294/fis.v37i2.1529
Wrenn, D. M. (1983). Urban waterfront development (1983 edition). Urban Land Institute.