EVALUATION OF STRUCTURE USING VARIETY OF SLAB TYPE UNDER PERFORMANCE-BASED DESIGN: CASE STUDY COMMON WORKING SPACE IN SURABAYA

Dewi  Pertiwi; Indra Komara; Yanisfa Septiarsilia; Dita Kamarul Fitriah

doi:10.21009/jpensil.v12i2.31492

Authors

Dewi Pertiwi Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan, Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya
Indra Komara Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan, Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya
Yanisfa Septiarsilia Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan, Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya
Dita Kamarul Fitriah Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan, Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/jpensil.v12i2.31492

Keywords:

Conventional Slab, Waffle Slab, Flat Slab, Performance Capacity,, Numerical Modelling

Abstract

Improvement of the current construction of midrise to high-rise building in Surabaya relatively needs to be evaluated, especially for compact office building area, it is very challenging to have an optimal space to the structural system with facilitate a satisfactory capacity performance. This paper makes a comparative study of the effectivity of structural plate structure in the compact office building between conventional slab (M1), waffle slab (M2) and flat slab (M3). A typical 5-story reinforced concrete building structure is selected as a case study within 6 m symmetrically span for each model. The proposed method used in this study is based on empirical analysis followed by numerical evaluation using SAP2000. The step initiated by deriving an optimal alternative of various type of slab. This study aims to emphasize the benefits to the functionality of the structural system which more efficient in term of structural capacity and its performance. As the result, M1 and M3 offer a similar behaviour due to the reinforcement and design performance with high slab deformation compared to the M2. M2 present a lower slab deflection under the supported of waffle element with the result almost twice smaller than M1 and M3.

References

Kumar C M R Manjunatha H B Channappa T M dan Prashanth M H, 2011 Seismic Performance Evaluation of Irregular RC Buildings with Mass Irregularity 1, April hal. 1–10.
[2] Wijaya C Wijaya S W Muljati I dan Pudjisuryadi P, 2013 Evaluasi Kinerja Direct Displacement-Based Design Dan Force Based Design Bangunan Irregular Plan 6-Lantai J. Dimens. Pratama Tek. Sipil, 2(2). hal. 1–8.
[3] Hirde S dan Aher R, 2016 Seismic Evaluation of Irregular Structures Issue Spec. 3, 5 hal. 750–755.
[4] Mansur M A Huang L M Tan K H dan Lee S L, 1992 Deflections of reinforced concrete beams with web openings ACI Struct. J. 89, 4 hal. 391–397.
[5] American Institute of Steel Construction, 2010 Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings Seism. Provisions Struct. Steel Build. 1 hal. 402.
[6] Powell G H, 2008 Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures Earthq. Spectra 24, 2 hal. 555–557.
[7] Alghuff A Y Shihada S M dan Tayeh B A, 2019 Comparative Study of Static and Response Spectrum Methods for Seismic Analysis of Regular RC Buildings J. Appl. Sci. 19, 5 hal. 495–503.
[8] Kottegodo N T dan Rosso R, 2008 Applied Statistics for Civil and Engineers .
[9] Standard B, 2002 Structural use of concrete — Part 1: Code of practice for design and construction Incorporating Amendment No. 1 December.
[10] Eşki H Sayın B dan Güneş B, 2020 The effect on structural behavior of different slab types for RC buildings J. Struct. Eng. Appl. Mech. 3, 1 hal. 41–48.
[11] Susanti E Istiono H Komara I Pertiwi D dan Septiarsilia Y, 2021 Effect of fly ash to water-cement ratio on the characterization of the concrete strength IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1010 hal. 012035.
[12] Oktaviani W N Tambusay A Komara I Sutrisno W Faimun F dan Suprobo P, 2020 Flexural Behaviour of a Reinforced Concrete Beam Blended with Fly ash as Supplementary Material IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 506 hal. 012042.
[13] Mooy M Tambusay A Komara I Sutrisno W Faimun dan Suprobo P, 2020 Evaluation of Shear-Critical Reinforced Concrete Beam Blended with Fly Ash IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 506 hal. 012041.
[14] Bastian M A Tambusay A Komara I Sutrisno W Irawan D dan Suprobo P, 2020 Enhancing the Ductility of a Reinforced Concrete Beam using Engineered Cementitious Composite IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 506 hal. 012044.
[15] Komara I Tambusay A Sutrisno W dan Suprobo P, 2019 Engineered Cementitious Composite as an innovative durable material: A review ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 14, 4 hal. 822–833.
[16] Nareswarananindya Laksono S H Ramadhani A N Budianto A Komara I dan Syafiarti A I D, 2021 The design concept of bamboo in micro housing as a sustainable self-building material IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1010 hal. 012026.
[17] Kumar B, 2017 Use of Flat Slabs in Multi-Storey Commercial Building Int. J. Recent Trends Eng. Res. 3, 9 hal. 24–36.
[18] Pratomo A H W, 2018 Studi Efisiensi Penggunaan Flat Slab dengan Drop Panel terhadap Pelat Konvesional Pada Gedung 5 Lantai Kurva S 53, 9 hal. 1–7.
[19] Agia V R, 2016 Efisiensi Penggunaan Plat Cendawan Terhadap Plat KOnvensional Pada Gedung Pascasarjana UMS Univ. Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
[20] Malviya S, 2020 Behaviour of Flat Slab, Waffle Slab, Ribbed & Secondary Beam in a multistorey Building under Seismic Response: A Review Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 8, 12 hal. 986–992.
[21] Torabian A Isufi B Mostofinejad D dan Ramos A P, 2019 Behavior of thin lightly reinforced flat slabs under concentric loading Eng. Struct. 196, June hal. 1–16.
[22] Yang E, 2008, Designing Added Functions in Engineered Cementitious Composite, Michigan University.
[23] Pertiwi D Komara I dan Fristian R, 2021 Design concept of reinforced concrete beams with large web openings IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1010 hal. 012039.
[24] Badan Standardisasi Nasional, 2002 Tata Cara Perhitungan Struktur Beton Untuk Bangunan Gedung. SNI 03-2847-2002 Bandung Badan Stand. Nas. hal. 251.
[25] 1726:2012 S, 2019 Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa Untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung dan Non Gedung Badan Stand. Nas. Indones. 8 hal. 254.