FINANCIAL CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTOR OF PSN SPAM PROJECT MANAGEMENT, REGIONAL JATILUHUR PHASE 1

Andre Tampubolon; Darmawan Pontan

doi:10.21009/jpensil.v15i1.61352

Authors

Andre Tampubolon Master of Civil Engineering Study Program, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning, Universitas Trisakti
Darmawan Pontan Master of Civil Engineering Study Program, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning, Universitas Trisakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/jpensil.v15i1.61352

Keywords:

Critical Success Factor, Financial, AHP, PSN SPAM, Project Management

Abstract

Research analyzing Non-Technical Critical Success Factors, especially those related to finance, has not been widely conducted in the field of construction management in developing countries such as Indonesia. This study aims to describe the financial critical success factors of the Jatiluhur Regional SPAM PSN Project Management Phase 1 and to analyze which factors are most dominant. The current study only focuses on the financial aspects of the project CSFs, namely Project Related Factors, Business and Work Environment Related Factors, Client Related Factors, and Project Management Factors. Primary research data were collected through an AHP questionnaire distributed to 5 key informants. The results of the analysis of the financial critical success factors of the Jatiluhur Regional SPAM PSN Project Management Phase 1 show that project-related factors have the highest weight (0.588), followed by client-related factors (0.175), the next factor is project management factors (0.133), land transfer pricing (0.070), and finally business and work environment-related factors. The results of the weighting analysis of the financial critical success factor sub-factors of the Jatiluhur Regional SPAM PSN Project Management Phase 1 showed that the project capital composition sub-factor ranked first in terms of overall importance of the CSF sub-factors of the Jatiluhur Regional SPAM PSN Project Management Phase 1, with a weighting of 0.270 (27%).

References

Addo, K. A. (2025). Demand for Guarantees and Investments in Africa Infrastructure. University of Reading.

Adiyanti, N. P., & Fathurrahman, R. (2021). Assessing Critical Success Factors for PPP Water Project in Indonesia: Lessons from West Semarang. Policy & Governance Review, 5(2), 164. https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v5i2.372

Ally, O. J., Kulindwa, Y. J., & Mataba, L. (2025). Financial technology and credit risk management: the case of non-performing loans in Tanzanian banks. Cogent Economics & Finance, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2025.2459188

Auliya, R. R., Nurkholis, N., & Sabirin, M. T. (2023). Public-private partnership water supply project in Indonesia. International Journal of Business, Economics & Management, 6(2), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijbem.v6n2.2150

Bappenas (2025) Public Private Partnership 2025: Infrastructure Project Plan in Indonesia, Jakarta: Bappenas Republik Indonesia

Belay, S., Goedert, J., Woldesenbet, A., & Rokooei, S. (2022). AHP based multi criteria decision analysis of success factors to enhance decision making in infrastructure construction projects. Cogent Engineering, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2022.2043996

Datta, S. D., Sobuz, Md. H. R., Nafe Assafi, M., Sutan, N. M., Islam, Md. N., Mannan, M. B., Akid, A. S. M., & Hasan, N. Md. S. (2023). Critical project management success factors analysis for the construction industry of Bangladesh. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-01-2022-0006

Diwandari, S., Sela, E. I., Syahputra, B. E., Parama, N. A., & Septiarini, A. (2023). The Utility of Decision Tree and Analytics Hierarchy Process in Prioritizing of Social Aid Distribution due to Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. Journal of ICT Research and Applications, 17(1), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.5614/itbj.ict.res.appl.2023.17.1.6

Frish, S., Talmor, I., Hadar, O., Shoshany, M., & Shapira, A. (2025). Enhancing consistency of AHP-based expert judgements: A new approach and its implementation in an interactive tool. MethodsX, 14, 103341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103341

Getawa Ayalew, G., Admasu Alemneh, L., & Melkamu Ayalew, G. (2024). Exploring fuzzy AHP approaches for quality management control practices in public building construction projects. Cogent Engineering, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2024.2326765

Gundes, S., Atakul, N., & Buyukyoran, F. (2019). Financial issues in construction companies: bibliometric analysis and trends. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 46(4), 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2018-0249

Gunduz, M., & Almuajebh, M. (2020). Critical Success Factors for Sustainable Construction Project Management. Sustainability, 12(5), 1990. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051990

Ihsan. (2023). The Analysis Of The Effect Of Indirect Costs On The Performance Of Construction Project Implementation. Jurnal PenSil, 12(1), 100–119. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpensil.v12i1.30978

ingle, P. V., Adamu, M., Raut, A., Alyaseen, A., & Ahmed, O. S. (2025). A multi-criteria decision analytics approach for project delivery system selection in housing projects. Decision Analytics Journal, 17, 100651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2025.100651

Jokar, E., Nejad, A., & Lork, A. (2020). Risk prioritization and selection of contractor participating in Public-Private Partnership (PPP) infrastructure project using Hybrid Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS (Case Study: Saveh-Salafchegan Freeway Project). Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.31462/jcemi.2020.01001016

Laia, V. A., & Susetyo, B. (2024). Analysis Of The Influence Of Internal Factors On Project Performance In Low-Rise Commercial Building Construction Projects In Tangerang. Jurnal PenSil, 13(2), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpensil.v13i2.44021

Laininen, P., & Hämäläinen, R. P. (2003). Analyzing AHP-matrices by regression. European Journal of Operational Research, 148(3), 514–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00430-7

Limanseto, H. (2023). Libatkan Seluruh Pemangku Kepentingan, Pemerintah Wujudkan Proyek Strategis Nasional yang Miliki Manfaat Besar dan Berdampak Luas. In Siaran Pers Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian Republik Indonesia HM.4.6/380/SET.M.EKON.3/10/2023.

Maghsoodi, A. I., & Khalilzadeh, M. (2018). Identification and Evaluation of Construction Projects’ Critical Success Factors Employing Fuzzy-TOPSIS Approach. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 22(5), 1593–1605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1970-2

Marin, P. (2009). Public-Private Partnerships for Urban Water Utilities. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7956-1

Marsono. (2020). Pengunakaan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dalam Penelitian. In Media.

Naumenkova, S., Tishchenko, I., Mishchenko, S., Mishchenko, V., & Ivanov, V. (2020). Assessment and mitigation of credit risks in project financing. Banks and Bank Systems, 15(1), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.15(1).2020.08

Nazri, E. M., Balhuwaisl, M., & Kasim, M. M. (2016). A Pre-Evaluation Step towards a Guaranteed Consistent AHP-Based Pairwise Comparison. Journal of Advanced Research in Social and Behavioural Sciences, 4(1), 73–80.

Nurlia, R., Yureana, W., & Putri, A. (2023). Study of factors affecting construction quality, cost, and time in building project using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). E3S Web of Conferences, 429, 01008. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342901008

Oxford Economic. (2025). Building Indonesia’s future: Unblocking the pipeline of infrastructure projects.

Quang Vinh, N., Viet Thai, N., & Thi Hoang Ha, T. (2025). A hybrid fuzzy AHP-ANN approach for evaluating simulation models in tourism training. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2556471

Rahman, H. Z. (2024). Risk assessment of public-private partnership water projects in Indonesia. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(10), 6657. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i10.6657

Rashid, M., Abdalla, S. B., Yahia, M. W., Sukkar, A. W., Mushtaha, E., & Husein, L. M. (2026). Reassessing design priorities: Critical success factors (CSFs) and the disconnect between building design assumptions and project delivery. Results in Engineering, 29, 108573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108573

Razi, P. Z., Ramli, N. I., Ali, M. I., & Ramadhansyah, P. J. (2020). Selection of Contractor by Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 712(1), 012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/712/1/012014

Rehan, A., Thorpe, D., & Heravi, A. (2024). Project success factors for leadership practices and communication: challenges in the construction sector. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 17(3), 562–590. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-12-2023-0279

Rolionoa, C. A., Maulanaa, M. A., & Savitri, Y. R. (2025). Analytic Hierarchy Process as a Determinant of Irrigation Allocation Priorities with e-Paksi Parameters. Journal of Civil Engineering , 40(1).

Saaty, T. L. (2003). Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European Journal of Operational Research, 145(1), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00227-8

Silalahi, Y. I., Masthura, L., & Fahriana, N. (2023). Analisis Faktor - Faktor Penentu Keberhasilan Proyek Konstruksi Berdasarkan Mutu, Biaya dan Waktu. Jurnal Komposit, 7(2), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.32832/komposit.v7i2.14240

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sumaryana, A., Miftah, A. Z., Widianingsih, I., & Karlina, N. (2025). Turning over a new leaf: Post‐Covid infrastructure development planning and financing strategies in the organizational environment of Bandung City. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 17(3), 100170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100170

Surachman, E. N., Handayani, D., Suhendra, M., & Prabowo, S. (2020). Critical Success Factors on PPP Water Project in a Developing Country: Evidence from Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(10), 1071–1080. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no10.1071

Syugiarto, S. (2024). Availability Payment Based Public Private Partnerships In Indonesia. PARADIGMA : Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 3(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.55100/paradigma.v3i1.63

Tahir, J., Atkinson, M., Tian, Z., Kassem, M., Ahmad, R., & Martinez, P. (2024). A critical analysis of public private partnership model in energy from waste projects. Sustainable Futures, 8, 100240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100240

Tripathi, K. K., & Jha, K. N. (2018). Determining Success Factors for a Construction Organization: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000569

Winoto, M. C., Guwinarto, K., & Limanto, S. (2023). Faktor Penyebab Dan Dampak Keterlambatan Pelaksanaan Proyek Konstruksi Menurut Kontraktor Terhadap Indikator Performa Proyek. Jurnal Dimensi Pratama Tenik Sipil, 12(1), 56–63.

Yahya, W. (2020). Pemetaan Persoalan Pada Tata Kelola Pelaksanaan Proyek Kerjasama Pemerintah dan Badan Usaha (KPBU) SPAM Regional Jatiluhur Tahap I [Thesis]. InstituteTeknologi Bandung.

Yin, Q. (2013). An AHP model for the evaluation of college experimental teaching quality. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.66

Yurdakul, H., Kamaşak, R., & Yazar Öztürk, T. (2022). Macroeconomic drivers of Public Private Partnership (PPP) projects in low income and developing countries: A panel data analysis. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.01.002