Pair Correlation Influence on Superconductors Josephson Penetration Depth

Yadhav Poudel; Suresh Prasad Gupta; Narayan Babu Shrestha; Kishori Yadav; Saddam Husain Dhobi

doi:10.21009/SPEKTRA.091.02

Authors

Yadhav Poudel Department of Physics, Patan Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University, Patandhoka, Lalitpur, Nepal
Suresh Prasad Gupta Department of Physics, Patan Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University, Patandhoka, Lalitpur, Nepal
Narayan Babu Shrestha Department of Physics, Patan Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University, Patandhoka, Lalitpur, Nepal
Kishori Yadav Department of Physics, Patan Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University, Patandhoka, Lalitpur, Nepal
Saddam Husain Dhobi Physical Science Unit, Nepal Academy of Science and Technology, Khumaltar, Lalitpur, Nepal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/SPEKTRA.091.02

Keywords:

superconductors, critical temperature, cooper pair correlation, coherence

Abstract

The Josephson penetration depth is an essential characteristic of Josephson junctions, serving a role akin to the London penetration depth in bulk superconductors. It originates from the substantial self-magnetic field generated by a strong Josephson supercurrent, influencing the distribution of the gauge invariant phase difference across the junction. This study delves into the intricate relationship between cooper pair correlation and critical temperature in superconductors. To study relationships authors develop theoretical method and observed that critical temperature exhibits a noteworthy decrease with an increase in cooper pair correlation. Specifically, as the level of coherence among electron pairs rises, the material's capacity to maintain the superconducting state at elevated temperatures is enhanced, resulting in an elevated critical temperature. Conversely, regions characterized by lower pair correlation demonstrate a sharp reduction in critical temperature, indicating their heightened susceptibility to changes in correlation levels. This sensitivity is particularly pronounced across junction and penetration depth where cooper pair correlation is diminished. Furthermore, the study reveals an exponential decay trend in critical temperature concerning cooper pair correlation, underscoring the pivotal role played by pair correlation in the superconducting state. Even slight alterations in pair correlation have a substantial impact on the material's ability to exhibit superconductivity. These findings provide valuable insights for the tailored design and optimization of superconducting materials for specific applications. By leveraging the understanding gained from this research, it becomes possible to engineer materials with enhanced superconducting properties. This study not only advances our fundamental comprehension of superconductivity but also offers practical implications for a diverse range of technological applications.

References

[1] M. Ichioka et al., “Paramagnetic and diamagnetic pair-breaking effect in electric-field-induced surface superconductivity under parallel magnetic fields,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 871, p. 012001, Jul. 2017. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/871/1/012001.
[2] T. Uchihashi, “Two-dimensional superconductors with atomic-scale thickness,” Superconductor Science and Technology, vol. 30, no. 1, p. 013002, Nov. 2016. doi:10.1088/0953-2048/30/1/013002.
[3] H. Kim et al., “Electrical Conductivity through a Single Atomic Step Measured with the Proximity-Induced Superconducting Pair Correlation,” Physical review letters, vol. 117, no. 11, Sep. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.117.116802.
[4] B. Pal et al., “Josephson diode effect from Cooper pair momentum in a topological semimetal,” Nature physics, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1228–1233, Aug. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01699-5.
[5] H.-C. Jiang and T. P. Devereaux, “Pair density wave and superconductivity in a kinetically frustrated doped Emery model on a square lattice,” Frontiers in Electronic Materials, vol. 3, Nov. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/femat.2023.1323404.
[6] D. Zhu et al., “Topological superconductivity in two-dimensional altermagnetic metals,” Physical Review B, vol. 108, no. 18, Nov. 2023, doi:
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.108.184505.
[7] T. Yanagisawa, “Enhanced pair correlation functions in the two-dimensional Hubbard model,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 033012, Mar. 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/15/3/033012.
[8] S. Dos et al., “Phase diagram for the extended Hubbard model on a square lattice.” Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.08683v1.pdf
[9] P. Mai et al., “Intertwined spin, charge, and pair correlations in the two-dimensional Hubbard model in the thermodynamic limit,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 119, no. 7, Feb. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2112806119.
[10] D. J. Scalapino et al., “d-wave pairing near a spin-density-wave instability,” Physical review, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 8190–8192, Dec. 1986, doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.34.8190.
[11] O. Gunnarsson et al., “Fluctuation Diagnostics of the Electron Self-Energy: Origin of the Pseudogap Physics,” Physical review letters, vol. 114, no. 23, Jun. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.114.236402.
[12] H. Chu et al., “Fano interference between collective modes in cuprate high-Tc superconductors,” Nature Communications, vol. 14, no. 1, Mar. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36787-4.
[13] Z.-B. Wu et al., “Homogeneous superconducting gap in DyBa2Cu3O7-δ synthesized by oxide molecular beam epitaxy,” Physical Review Materials, vol. 4, no. 12, Dec. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevmaterials.4.124801.
[14] X. Dong et al., “Mechanism of superconductivity in the Hubbard model at intermediate interaction strength,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 119, no. 33, Aug. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2205048119.
[15] W.-T. Lin and S. J. A, “Effects of incipient pairing on nonequilibrium quasiparticle transport in Fermi liquids,” Progress of theoretical and experimental physics, vol. 2022, no. 3, Feb. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptac027.
[16] H. Hao et al., “Auxiliary field quantum Monte Carlo for multiband Hubbard models: Controlling the sign and phase problems to capture Hund’s physics,” Physical review. B./Physical review. B, vol. 99, no. 23, Jun. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.99.235142.
[17] A. Georges, “Hund’s Correlated Materials Strong correlations from Hund’s coupling.” Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.3033v2.pdf
[18] Y. Nomura et al., “Exotics-wave superconductivity in alkali-doped fullerides,” Journal of physics. Condensed matter, vol. 28, no. 15, pp. 153001–153001, Mar. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/28/15/153001.
[19] A. Denisov et al., “Heat-Mode Excitation in a Proximity Superconductor,” Nanomaterials, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 1461, Jan. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12091461.
[20] G. Catelani and J. P. Pekola, “Using materials for quasiparticle engineering,” Materials for Quantum Technology, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 013001, Feb. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/2633-4356/ac4a75.
[21] Y. Ronen et al., “Charge of a quasiparticle in a superconductor,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 113, no. 7, pp. 1743–1748, Feb. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515173113.
[22] S. K. Das et al., “2D Electron System with Quasiparticle Auxiliary Field Correlation of Open quantum System,” Patan prospective journal, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 176–187, Sep. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3126/ppj.v2i1.48135.
[23] S. K. Tolpygo and M. Gurvitch, “Critical currents and Josephson penetration depth in planar thin‐film high‐Tc Josephson junctions,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 69, no. 25, pp. 3914–3916, Dec. 1996, doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.117568.
[24] A. Gharaati et al., “Analytical solution of fluxons in a non-homogeneous Josephson junction,” Waves in Random and Complex Media, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 249–259, May 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17455030.2011.652365.
[25] G. Lythe and F. G. Mertens, “Rice’s ansatz for overdampedφ4kinks at finite temperature,” Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics, vol. 67, no. 2, Feb. 2003, doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.67.027601.
[26] T. Li et al., “Josephson penetration depth in coplanar junctions based on 2D materials,” Journal of applied physics, vol. 126, no. 17, Nov. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5124391.
[27] D. S. Kalashnikov et al., “Demonstration of a Josephson vortex-based memory cell with microwave energy-efficient readout,” Communications Physics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Mar. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-024-01570-4.
[28] D. Montemurro et al., “Enhanced Josephson coupling in hybrid nanojunctions,” Physical review. B./Physical review. B, vol. 107, no. 9, Mar. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.107.094517.