Project-based plant morphology module as teaching material for students' concept mastery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.49896Keywords:
Written in English 3-5 words or groups of words, Written alphabeticallyAbstract
The necessity for teaching materials that can effectively facilitate students' skills has become increasingly evident in order to enhance concept mastery. The objective of this study is to develop teaching materials in the form of project-based modules on plant morphology for the purpose of facilitating concept mastery. The Project-Based Plant Morphology Module was developed in accordance with the ADDIE model (Branch, 2009), which comprises five phases: analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The research instruments utilized for the development process included a validation questionnaire, a student response questionnaire, and a concept mastery test. Validity of the module was obtained through the use of instruments in the form of book validation sheets, which were completed by experts in the fields of media, materials, and education. The module trials were obtained through the implementation instruments for the individual components and the management of the learning implementation. Product trials will be conducted with students enrolled in the Biology Education program during the second semester of the 2022/2023 academic year. The data used to validate the module was obtained from the module's expert validators using a validation sheet. The data obtained from the product trial is analyzed in order to assess the readability of the module. The results indicated that the plant morphology module was classified as "very feasible." The responses of students to the module indicated that it was categorized as "very easy to understand". Consequently, the plant morphology module is deemed a valuable and effective component of plant morphology courses
References
Akbar, S. (2017). Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Aldoobie, N. (2015). ADDIE Model. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(6), 68–72. https://www.aijcrnet.com/journals/Vol_5_No_6_December_2015/10.pdf
Alsalhi, N. R. I. (2020). The Representation of Multiple Intelligences in the Science Textbook and the Extent of Awareness of Science Teachers at the Intermediate Stage of This Theory. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100706
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. . (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing (A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomi of Educational Objectives). Addission Wesley Longman, INC.
Archer-Bradshaw, R. E. (2017). Teaching for Scientific Literacy? An Examination of Instructional Practices in Secondary Schools in Barbados. Research in Science Education, 47(1), 67–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9490-x
Arikunto, S. (1997). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek (Edisi Revi). PT Rineka Cipta.
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. Springer New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1002/0470018860.s00683
Cannady, M. A., Vincent-Ruz, P., Chung, J. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2019). Scientific Sensemaking Supports Science Content Learning Across Disciplines and Instructional Contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59(4), 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101802
Chaisri, A., & Thathong, K. (2014). The Nature of Science Represented in Thai Biology Textbooks Under the Topic of Evolution. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 621–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.268
Chiappetta, E. L., & Fillman, D. A. (1991). A Method to Quantify Major Themes of Scientific Literacy in Science Textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(8), 713–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280808
Chiappetta, E. L., & Fillman, D. A. (2007). Analysis of Five High School Biology Textbooks Used in the United States for Inclusion of the Nature of Science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(15), 1847–1868. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601159407
Demirel, M., & Caymaz, B. (2015). Prospective Science and Primary School Teachers’ Self-efficacy Beliefs in Scientific Literacy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191(1), 1903–1908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.500
Dikmenli, M., & Cardak, O. (2010). A Study on Biology Student Teachers’ Conceptions of Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 933–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.129
Dragoş, V., & Mih, V. (2015). Scientific Literacy in School. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 209, 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.273
Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and Reliability in Social Science Research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123. https://www.erpjournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/ERPV38-1.-Drost-E.-2011.-Validity-and-Reliability-in-Social-Science-Research.pdf
Endang, N. (2010). Pengembangan Modul. Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Gordon, W. G. (2009). The ADDIE Model: An Instructional Generic Design Model Strategy. Advanstar Communications.
Gozuyesil, E., & Dikici, A. (2014). The Effect of Brain Based Learning on Academic Achievement: A Meta-analytical Study. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(2), 642–648. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.2.2103
Gyamah, G. (2022). Effectiveness of Group Investigation Versus Lecture-Based Instruction on Students’ Concept Mastery and Transfer in Social Studies. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2022.05.001
Hughes, M., Hughes, P., & Hodgkinson, I. R. (2017). In Pursuit of a “Whole-brain” Approach to Undergraduate Teaching: Implications of the Herrmann Brain Dominance Model. Studies in Higher Education, 42(12), 2389–2405. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1152463
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Meaningful Assesment A Manageable and Cooperative Process. Allyn & Bacon.
Kemdikbud. (2017). Panduan Praktis Penyusunan E-Modul. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI.
Klein, J. I., Taveras, S., King, S. H., Commitante, A., Curtis-Bey, L., & Stripling, B. (2009). Project-Based Learning: Inspiring Middle School Students to Engage in Deep and Active Learning. In Division of Teaching and Learning Office of Curriculum, Standards, and Academic Engagement. NYC Department of Education.
Košir, S., & Lakshminarayanan, R. (2021). Inclusion of “Generations of Human Rights” in Social Science Textbooks. International Journal of Educational Development, 80(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102295
Lawson, A. . (1995). Science Teaching and The Development of Thinfking. Wadswort. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Le Roux, I. (2011). New Large Class Pedagogy: Developing Students’ Whole Brain Thinking Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15(1), 426–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.116
Lewis, P. J. (2016). Brain Friendly Teaching—Reducing Learner’s Cognitive Load. Academic Radiology, 23(7), 877–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.01.018
Mardhiyah, R.H., Sekar Nurul Fajriyah Aldriani, Sekar Nurul Fajriyah, Chitta, S. N. F. M. R. Z. (2021). Pentingnya Keterampilan Belajar di Abad 21 sebagai Tuntutan dalam Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Lectura : Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.31849/lectura.v16i1
Mitee, T. L., & Obaitan, G. N. (2015). Effect of Mastery Learning on Senior Secondary School Students’ Cognitive Learning Outcome in Quantitative Chemistry. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(5), 34–38. http://search.proquest.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/docview/1773220132?accountid=12372
Moundy, K., Chafiq, N., & Talbi, M. (2022). Digital Textbook and Flipped Classroom: Experimentation of the Self-Learning Method Based on the Development of Soft Skills and Disciplinary Knowledge. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(7), 240–259. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i07.28933
Nasution. (2006). Berbagai Pendekatan Dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bumi Aksara.
Redhana, I. W. (2019). Mengembangkan Keterampilan Abad Ke-21 Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v13i1.17824
Riduwan. (2015). Dasar-Dasar Statistika. Alfabeta.
Roberts, K., Benson, A., & Mills, J. (2021). E-textbook Technology: Are Instructors Using it and What is the Impact on Student Learning? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning, 14(3), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-04-2021-0028
Robinson, K. M., Dubé, A. K., & Beatch, J. (2017). Children’s Understanding of Additive Concepts. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 156, 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.11.009
Robinson, K. M., Price, J. A. B., & Demyen, B. (2018). Understanding Arithmetic Concepts: Does operation matter? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166(1), 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.09.003
Sakri, A. (2008). Cara Menulis Buku Ajar. ITB.
Sands, D. (2014). Concepts and Conceptual Understanding : What Are We Talking About ? NDIR, The Higher Education Academy, 10(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.11120/ndir.2014.00030
Simpson, D. Y., Beatty, A. E., & Ballen, C. J. (2021). Teaching Between the Lines: Representation in Science Textbooks. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 36(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2020.10.010
Stalvey, H. E., Burns-childers, A., Chamberlain, D., Kemp, A., Meadows, L. J., & Vidakovic, D. (2018). Students ’ Understanding of the Concepts Involved in One-sample Hypothesis Testing. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 1(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.03.011
Sudjana, N. (2005). Dasar-dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Sinar Baru Algensindo.
Suwono, H., Pratiwi, H. E., Susanto, H., & Susilo, H. (2017). Enhancement of Students’ Biological Literacy and Critical Thinking of Biology Through Socio-biological Case-based Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.9622
Tanaka, K., & Watanabe, K. (2013). Effects of Learning With Explicit Elaboration on Implicit Transfer of Visuomotor Sequence Learning. Experimental Brain Research, 228(4), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3573-6
Tjitrosoepomo, G. (2012). Morfologi Tumbuhan. Gajah Mada University Press.
Utaberta, N., & Hassanpour, B. (2012). Aligning Assessment with Learning Outcomes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 60(1), 228–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.372
Yan, T., Wang, Z., Lio, C., Xu, W., & Wan Li. (2021). Effects of The Morphological Characteristics of Plants on Rainfall Interception and Kinetic Energy. Journal of Hydrology, 592(125807). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125807
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi (Biosferjpb) and Departement of Biology Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta as publisher of the journal.
