Students’ understanding of ecology: Identifying interaction between ecosystem components

Authors

  • Puti Siswandari Biology Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Farhah Nadhif Tsalist Biology Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Sinta Atsmari Khomsah Biology Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Nazwa Noor Hidayah Biology Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Risa Meidawati SMA Laboratorium UPI Cibiru, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.66792

Keywords:

Drawings, Ecosystem components, Interactions

Abstract

Ecology learning in schools should go beyond explaining isolated concepts, involving visual representations to help students comprehend the complexity of ecological systems. This study aimed to analyze high school students’ understanding of the interactions among ecosystem components using student-generated drawings. Sixty-three 10th-grade students participated in the study. This study employed a pre-test and post-test design by collecting student-generated drawings at two time points: before the instructional intervention to establish a baseline and after the intervention to assess its impact on students’ understanding. The students’ drawings of river ecosystems were analyzed and coded on three system levels: biotic-abiotic (BA), micro-macro (MM), and components-mechanisms-phenomena (CMP). Results from the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test indicated significant improvements in students’ ability to represent interactions across these system levels. Effect size calculations revealed large effects between BA:MM and BA:CMP, suggesting substantial learning gains. A moderate effect was observed between MM:CMP. While students showed a clear improvement in describing BA:MM interactions, their depictions of CMP remained limited. These findings highlight the importance of teaching strategies on ecosystem that explicitly integrate abiotic mechanisms at multiple biological scales. Such approaches can support students in visualizing ecological processes as interconnected systems, rather than fragmented components.

References

Ainsworth, S. E., & Scheiter, K. (2021). Learning by Drawing Visual Representations: Potential, Purposes, and Practical Implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420979582

Akçay, S. (2017). Prospective elementary science teachers’ understanding of photosynthesis and cellular respiration in the context of multiple biological levels as nested systems. Journal of Biological Education, 51(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1170067

Azrai, E. P., Japar, M., & Situmorang, R. (2025). Diagnosis of ecosystem misconceptions for high school students in Jakarta. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(5), 3790–3800. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i5.28126

Butwong, P., Nuangchalerm, P., & Prommarat, J. (2025). Developing System Thinking of Grade 10 Science Students through Problem-based Learning with Causal Maps. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 6(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v6i4.103

da Silva, J. P., Teixeira, R. da S., da Silva, I. R., Soares, E. M. B., & Lima, A. M. N. (2022). Decomposition and nutrient release from legume and non-legume residues in a tropical soil. European Journal of Soil Science, 73(1), 1–16. https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.13151

Demssie, Y. N., Biemans, H. J. A., Wesselink, R., & Mulder, M. (2023). Fostering students’ systems thinking competence for sustainability by using multiple real-world learning approaches. Environmental Education Research, 29(2), 261–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2141692

Dentzau, M. (2021). Students’ Changing Mental Models of the Longleaf Pine Ecosystem. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/10972

Dozier, S. J., MacPherson, A., Morell, L., Gochyyev, P., & Wilson, M. (2023). A Learning Progression for Understanding Interdependent Relationships in Ecosystems. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914212

Düsing, K., Asshoff, R., & Hammann, M. (2019). Students’ conceptions of the carbon cycle: identifying and interrelating components of the carbon cycle and tracing carbon atoms across the levels of biological organisation. Journal of Biological Education, 53(1), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1447002

Eberbach, C., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Jordan, R., Taylor, J., & Hunter, R. (2021). Multidimensional trajectories for understanding ecosystems. Science Education, 105(3), 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21613

Gansemer-Topf, A. M., Paepcke-Hjeltness, V., Russell, A. E., & Schiltz, J. (2021). “Drawing” your Own Conclusions: Sketchnoting as a Pedagogical Tool for Teaching Ecology. Innovative Higher Education, 46(3), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-020-09542-6

Glettler, C., & Torkar, G. (2021). First-Year Pre-service Primary School Teachers’ Conceptual Structure of Ecosystem Ecology Concepts. Action Research and Innovation in Science Education, 4(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.51724/arise.41

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Jordan, R., Eberbach, C., & Sinha, S. (2017). Systems learning with a conceptual representation: a quasi-experimental study. Instructional Science, 45(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9392-y

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Marathe, S., & Liu, L. (2007). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701413401

Horne, L., Manzanares, A., Atalan-Helicke, N., Vincent, S., Anderson, S. W., & Romulo, C. L. (2025). An exploratory study of drawings as a tool to evaluate student understanding of the Food-Energy-Water (FEW) Nexus. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 15(2), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-024-00929-x

Lankers, A., Timm, J., & Schmiemann, P. (2023). Students’ systems thinking while modeling a dynamic ecological system. Frontiers in Education, 8(July). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1187237

Lin, J. H., Yang, S. C., & Lin, J. Y. (2024). Fostering ecosystem understanding: The synergistic impact of inquiry-based instruction and information literacy. Computers and Education, 220(June), 105125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105125

Mambrey, S., Schreiber, N., & Schmiemann, P. (2022). Young Students’ Reasoning About Ecosystems: the Role of Systems Thinking, Knowledge, Conceptions, and Representation. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09917-x

Mambrey, S., Timm, J., Landskron, J. J., & Schmiemann, P. (2020). The impact of system specifics on systems thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(10), 1632–1651. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21649

Martín-Gámez, C., Acebal, M. del C., & Prieto, T. (2020). Developing the concept of ‘ecosystem’ through inquiry-based learning: a study of pre-service primary teachers. Journal of Biological Education, 54(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1554596

Mokuku, T., & Tlhakola, K. (2021). Using DPSIR Framework to Determine Secondary School Students’ Conception of Ecological Concepts in the Context of a Wetland Ecosystem. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(4-In Progress). https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11021

Momsen, J., Speth, E. B., Wyse, S., & Long, T. (2022). Using Systems and Systems Thinking to Unify Biology Education. CBE Life Sciences Education, 21(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-05-0118

Putri, S. S., & Rusyati, L. (2021). Analyzing the science misconception in mastery concept of ecosystem topic at senior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012125

Ristanto, R. H., Suryanda, A., & Indraswari, L. A. (2023). The development of ecosystem misconception diagnostic test. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(4), 2246–2259. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i4.25200

Robles-Piñeros, J., & Tateo, L. (2023). Isn’t all about trash.. Children’s conceptions about ecology and their implications for biology education in Colombia. Journal of Biological Education, 57(3), 692–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.1941189

Ryan, Z., Danish, J., Zhou, J., Stiso, C., Murphy, D., Duncan, R., Chinn, C., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2023). Investigating students’ development of mechanistic reasoning in modeling complex aquatic ecosystems. Frontiers in Education, 8(July), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1159558

Shin, N., Bowers, J., Roderick, S., McIntyre, C., Stephens, A. L., Eidin, E., Krajcik, J., & Damelin, D. (2022). A framework for supporting systems thinking and computational thinking through constructing models. Instructional Science, 50(6), 933–960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09590-9

Snowman, S. A., Sanford, R. M., & Staples, J. K. (2017). The Draw-an-Ecosystem Task as an Assessment Tool in Environmental Science Education. Science Education and Civic Engagement, 9(1), 35–40. https://seceij.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Sanford__Winter2017.pdf

Sudianto, Amrillah Rosyadi, & Yusuf. (2024). Evaluasi Tingkat Pemahaman Konsep Siswa pada Materi Komponen Ekosistem dan Interaksi Antar Komponen Kelas X SMA Negeri 2 Bayan Kabupaten Lombok Utara. Otus Education: Jurnal Biologi Dan Pendidikan Biologi, 2(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.62588/otusedu.2024.v2i2.0111

Thyberg, A., Schönborn, K., & Gericke, N. (2025). Phases of Progression: Students’ meaning-making of Epigenetic Visual Representations within and between Levels of Organization. Research in Science Education, 55(2), 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10196-z

Triana, B. M. (2023). Potret Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA pada Materi Komponen Penyusun dan Interaksi dalam Ekosistem. Jurnal BIOEDUIN, 13(2), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.15575/bioeduin.v13i2.18766

Vuorio, E., Pernaa, J., & Aksela, M. (2024). Lessons for Sustainable Science Education: A Study on Chemists’ Use of Systems Thinking across Ecological, Economic, and Social Domains. Education Sciences, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070741

Wang, M., Yang, M., & Kyle, W. C. (2023). Effect of retrieval practice and drawing on high school students’ conceptual understanding of the carbon cycle. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-023-00083-4

Wanselin, H., Danielsson, K., & Wikman, S. (2023). Meaning-Making in Ecology Education: Analysis of Students’ Multimodal Texts. Education Sciences, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050443

Yoon, S. A., Goh, S. E., & Park, M. (2018). Teaching and Learning About Complex Systems in K–12 Science Education: A Review of Empirical Studies 1995–2015. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 285–325. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317746090

Downloads

Published

2026-08-04

How to Cite

Siswandari, P., Nadhif Tsalist, F., Atsmari Khomsah, S., Noor Hidayah, N., & Meidawati, R. (2026). Students’ understanding of ecology: Identifying interaction between ecosystem components. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 19(2), 659–670. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.66792

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 2 (2026): Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi (Biosferjpb) and Departement of Biology Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta as publisher of the journal.