STUDI ANALISIS GAYA BELAJAR SISWA YANG MENGACU MODEL GRASHA-REICHMANN PADA MATA PELAJARAN KELOMPOK KEJURUAN KELAS X SMK KOMPETENSI KEAHLIAN TEKNIK GAMBAR BANGUNAN
Penelitian ini dilaksanakan pada SMK Negeri 26 dan 52 Jakarta Semester Genap Tahun 2014/2015
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/jpensil.v4i1.9855Keywords:
Learning Style, Grasha-Reichmann, Vocational studentAbstract
This study was aimed to know the representation that refers to students' learning styles of Grasha Model-Reichmann in vocational subjects of 10th Grade of Vocational High School (VHS), Competency of Architecture Engineering. The study lasted from April to May 2015.
This research is using a descriptive quantitative survey approach. The population in this study were all 10th students of 26 and 52 VHS of Jakarta with a total of 122 people. The sampling method is using the saturated sampling techniques with a total of 122 people. The techniques used for data collection are communication techniques and documentation. The instrument for students that are used in the form of a questionnaire from a total of 60 statements refers to Grasha-Reichmann Student Learning Style (GRSLS). The result is that there are 49 number of valid statement with very high reliability of (r11) = 0.96.
Based on the research that has been done, the students' learning styles that is mainly used to the Subject of Building Construction is the collaborative learning style (78.93%), collaborative learning style (80.00%) for the Measure Soil Science Subjects, collaborative learning style (78.50%) for the Engineering Mechanics Subject, and participant learning styles (75.66%) for the Subject of engineering drawings.Results of interviews with teachers indicate that the Subject Building Construction, Measure Soil Science and Engineering Mechanics during the learning process using lecture while teaching style to the Subject engineering drawings using peer tutors. The difference between the student's learning style with teachers teaching style shows the results obtained by each student also had differences.
References
Chairunnisa, Ajeng. (2012). Hard Skill dan Soft Skill. http://ajengnissaa.blogspot.com/2012/03/hard-skill-dan-soft-skill.html [24 Juni 2015]
Danasasmita, E. Kosasih. 2009. Profil Gaya Belajar Siswa SMKN 5 Bandung Pada Pembelajaran Normatif, Adaptif, dan Produktif [skripsi]. Bandung. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
DePorter, Bobbi & Hernacki, Mike. 2000. Quantum learning: membiasakan belajar nyaman dan menyenangkan. Bandung: Kaifa.
Diaz, D. P., & Cartnal, R. B. (1999). Students' learning styles in two classes: Online distance learning and equivalent on-campus. College Teaching 47(4), 130-135. http://www.c3l.uni-oldenburg.de/cde/support/readings/diaz.htm [4 Maret 2015]
Dimyati dan Mudjiono. 2002. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT. Asdi Mahasatya.
Fahrianti, Marthia. 2012. Studi Gaya Mengajar Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar Siswa Pada Materi AutoCAD [skripsi]. Jakarta: Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
Fahreza, Muhammad. 2014. Pengertian Konsentrasi menurut Beberapa Ahli. https://mfahreza742.wordpress.com/2014/05/14/pengertian-konsentrasi-menurut-beberapa-ahli/ [15 Maret 2015]
Ghufron, M. Nur & Risnawati, Rini. 2012. Gaya Belajar: kajian teoretik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Grasha, Tony. 1996. Teaching with Style: A Practical Guide to Enhanching Learning by Understanding Teaching and Learning Styles. San Bernadino: Alliance Publishers. http://www.ltseries.com/LTS/sitepgs/GRSLSS/styles.htm [4 Maret 2015]
Gunawan, Adi W. 2003. Genius Learning Strategy, Petunjuk Praktis untuk Menerapkan Accelerated Learning. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Hamalik, Oemar. 2006. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Bumi Aksara.
Hamidah, Jaafar Sidek. 2009. The Social Interaction Learning Style of Science and Social Science Students. Malaysia: Faculty of Applied Sciences: Universiti Teknologi MARA Perlis. www.cccsenet.org/journal.html [4 Maret 2015]
International Journal of Social, Education, Economics and Management Engineering Vol:4, No:3, 2010.
Julistiani, Yunita. 2013. Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Kelas XI Kompetensi Keahlian Teknik Gambar Bangunan di SMK Negeri 5 Bandung [skripsi]. Jakarta: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Margono, Drs. S. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Nurman. 2006. Hubungan Gaya Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Mata Pelajaran Akuntansi [skripsi]. Jakarta: Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Ngalim, Purwanto. 2009. Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Purwanto. 2007. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif untuk Psikologi dan Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Purwanto. 2011. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Riyadi, Pawit. 2011. Partisipasi Belajar Siswa. http://pawitriyadi87.blogspot.com/2011/12/partisipasi-belajar-siswa.html [24 Juni 2015]
Saputera, Yohanor. 2012. Belajar Gambar Teknik. http://yohan46.blogspot.com/2012/05/belajar-gambar-teknik-yuk.html [10 Juli 2015]
Sardiman A. M,. 2005. Interaksi & Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Siregar, Eveline & Nara, Hartini. 2010. Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Sudjana, Dr. Nana. 2009. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sugiyono, Prof. Dr. 2010. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif , dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukmadinata, Prof. Dr. Nana Syaodih. 2010. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Rosda.
Suratno. 2013. Penanaman Nilai Kerjasama Untuk Membentuk Kompetensi Mahasiswa Dalam Perspektif Pembelajaran Kolaboratif [disertasi]. Lampung: Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat. http://www.academia.edu/4105978/Penanaman_Nilai_Kerjasama_Untuk_Membentuk_Kompetensi_Mahasisa_Dalam_Perspektif_Pembelajaran_Kolaboratif [24 Juni 2015]
Susilo, M. Joko. 2009. Sukses dengan Gaya Belajar. Yogyakarta: PINUS.
Sutikno, M. Sobry. 2005. Pembelajaran Efektif. Mataram: NTP Press
Ulya, Jauharatul. 2013. Keberhasilan Program Praktik Kerja Industri Ditinjau Dari Prestasi Mata Pelajaran Produktif dan Minat Praktik Pada Peserta Didik Kelas XI SMK Muhamadiyah 2 Surakarta Tahun Ajaran 2012/2013 [skripsi]. Surakarta: Universitas Muhamadiyah Surakarta.