The validity and practicality of the SEDC learning model in enhance student’s higher order thinking skills in science learning

Authors

  • Rusmala Evi Anggraeni Magister of Science Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jember, Indonesia
  • S Suratno Magister of Science Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jember, Indonesia
  • Erlia Narulita Magister of Science Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jember, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.21616

Keywords:

Community of Inquiry, Higher Order Thinking Skills, HOTS, STEM

Abstract

As we move into the twenty-first century, education is becoming
increasingly critical in order to ensure that every student has the skills necessary to meet the demands of the twenty-first century. The challenge in the world of education in Indonesia today is to provide quality education that is capable of producing competent human resources. To meet the demands of the twenty-first century, STEM-based education is required. Students in Era 4.0 must not only have high-order thinking skills, but also digital literacy. Teachers and students must be able to make the best use of technology, which would enable teachers to develop an online learning setting. The effects of the Covid-19 pandemic have hastened the adoption of information technology in the field of education. By use of digital learning during COVID-19 offered excellent opportunities for teachers to gain experience in digital learning and teaching. The teacher must first plan by using a learning model that supports the online learning process, such as the Community of Inquiry (CoI). Therefore, the development of a STEM-based CoI learning model was carried out, namely SEDC. The aim of this study is to assess the SEDC learning model's validity and practicality. This study uses a 4D design to define, design, develop, and disseminate. In this study, 116 students participated in small-scale test, large-scale test, and dissemination studies, with two expert lecturers as validators and one teacher as users. The validation results were 95.6% with very valid categories, according to the findings. The result for practicality is 84.69% in the very practical category. As a result, this learning model can be concluded to be both valid and useful in rising HOTS. Therefore, it's suggested that it's used in the learning process

References

Abdulrahim, H., & Mabrouk, F. (2020). COVID-19 and the digital transformation of Saudi higher education. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 291–306.
Akbar, S. (2013). Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Afandi, Sajidan, Akhyar, M., & Suryani, N. (2019). Development frameworks of the Indonesian partnership 21 st -century skills standards for prospective science teachers: A Delphi study. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.11647
Andrian, Y., & Rusman, R. (2019). Implementasi pembelajaran abad 21 dalam kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 12(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v12i1.20116
Anggraeni, R. E., & Suratno. (2021). The analysis of the development of the 5E-STEAM learning model to improve critical thinking skills in natural science lesson. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1832(1), 012050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1832/1/012050
Anggraini, M. J., & Rochaminah, S. (2021). Validity of the Situntas Learning Model to Improve Conceptual Understandings. Psychology and …, 58, 509–517. http://psychologyandeducation.net/pae/index.php/pae/article/view/4702/4141
Apriyani, R., Ramalis, T. R., & Suwarma, I. R. (2019). Analyzing Student’s Problem Solving Abilities of Direct Current Electricity in STEM-based Learning. Journal of Science Learning, 2(3), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v2i3.17559
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Journal of Education,88(18). ASCD. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741808801819
Çalış, S. (2020). Physics-Chemistry Preservice Teachers’ Opinions About Preparing And Implementation Of Stem Lesson Plan. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 10(2), 2014–5349.
Çaycı, B., & Örnek, G. T. (2019). Effect of Stem-Based Activities Conducted in Science Classes on Various Variables. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 5(1), 260–268. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2019.51.260.268
Cetin, A. (2020). Examining Project-Based STEM Training In A Primary. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 7(3), 811–825.
Ceylan, S., & Ozdilek, Z. (2015). Improving a Sample Lesson Plan for Secondary Science Courses within the STEM Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177(July 2014), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.395
Dewi, S. P., Ermayanti, E., & Santoso, L. M. (2021). How CCDA instrument analyzed science pre-service teachers’ prior knowledge?. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 14(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.18247
E Apino & H Retnawati. (2017). Developing Instructional Design to Improve Mathematical Higher Order Thinking Skills of Students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001
Gulo, A. (2020). Meningkatkan Kompetensi Guru Dalam Menyusun Tes Hasil. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 13(1), 89–97.
Hacioğlu, Y., & Gülhan, F. (2021). The Effects of STEM Education on the 7th Grade Students’ Critical Thinking Skills and STEM Perceptions. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.771331
Hilliard, L. P., & Stewart, M. K. (2019). Time well spent: Creating a community of inquiry in blended first-year writing courses. Internet and Higher Education, 41(February 2018), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.11.002
Hobri, Ummah, I. K., Yuliati, N., & Dafik. (2020). The effect of jumping task based on creative problem solving on students’ problem solving ability. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13126a
Junus, K., Suhartanto, H., Suradijono, S. H. R., Santoso, H. B., & Sadita, L. (2019). The community of inquiry model training using the cognitive apprenticeship approach to improve students’ learning strategy in the asynchronous discussion forum. Journal of Educators Online, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.9743/jeo.2019.16.1.7
Kostiainen, E., Ukskoski, T., Ruohotie-lyhty, M., Kauppinen, M., Kainulainen, J., & Tommi, M. (2018). Meaningful learning in teacher education. 71, 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.009
Kurt, M., & Benzer, S. (2020). An Investigation on the Effect of STEM Practices on Sixth Grade Students’ Academic Achievement, Problem Solving Skills, and Attitudes towards STEM. Journal of Science Learning, 3(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v3i2.21419
Lévano, M., & Albornoz, A. (2016). Towards a Framework To Improve the Quality of Teaching and Learning : Consciousness and Validation in Computer Engineering Science , Uct. 100–106.
Munir, M., & Nur, R. H. (2018). The development of english learning model based on contextual teaching and learning (Ctl) in junior high schools. International Journal of Language Education, 2(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v2i1.4326
Novitra, F., Festiyed, Yohandri, & Asrizal. (2021). Development of Online-based Inquiry Learning Model to Improve 21st-Century Skills of Physics Students in Senior High School. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(9), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11152
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do: Vol. I.
Özhan, Ş. Ç., & Kocadere, S. A. (2020). The Effects of Flow, Emotional Engagement, and Motivation on Success in a Gamified Online Learning Environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(8), 2006–2031. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118823159
Parmin, & Sajidan. (2019). The application of STEM education in science learning at schools in industrial areas. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(2), 278–289. https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/193
Pimthong, P., & Williams, J. (2018). Preservice teachers’ understanding of STEM education. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 1–7. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kjss/article/view/232607
Purwadi, Saputra, W. N. E., Wahyudi, A., Supriyanto, A., Muyana, S., Rohmadheny, P. S., Ariyanto, R. D., & Kurniawan, S. J. (2021). Student perceptions of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia: A study of phenomenology. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1515–1528. https://doi.org/ 10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1515
Puspitarini, Y. D., & Hanif, M. (2019). Using Learning Media to Increase Learning Motivation in Elementary School. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2019.426a
Rachman, A. N., Maghfiroh, A., & ... (2021). Community of Inquiry for Students’ Autonomy in English Language Learning: A Case of Philippines High School. Journal of English 6(1), 1–13. http://eprints.umpo.ac.id/8052/
Ramli, N. F., Talib, O., Hassan, S. A., & Manaf, U. K. A. (2020). Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure STEM Teachers’ Instructional Preparedness. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(3), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i3.11084
Rasmitadila., Aliyyah, Rusi Rusmiati., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A., Syaodih, E., Nurtanto, M., & Tambunan, A. R. S. (2020). The perceptions of primary school teachers of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic period : A Case study in Indonesia. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 90–109.
Ristanto, R. H., Kristiani, E., & Lisanti, E. (2022). Flipped Classroom–Digital Game Based Learning (FC-DGBL): Enhancing Genetics Conceptual Understanding of Students in Bilingual Programme. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(1), 332-352.
Sarigöz, I. H. (2019). ELT Teacher Trainees’ Encounters with Syllabus Design. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 11(1), 190–196.
Setiawati, W., Asmira, O., Ariyan, Y., Bestary, R., & Pudjiastuti, A. (2019). Buku Penilaian Berorientasi Higer Order Thinkings Skills (HOTS). Dirjen GTK Kemendikbud, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Sofia, H. W., Utomo, A. P., Hariyadi, S., Wahono, B., & Narulita, E. (2020). The validity and effectivity of learning using STEAM module with biotechnology game. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 6(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i1.10979
Suratno, S., Wahono, B., Chang, C. Y., Retnowati, A., & Yushardi, Y. (2020). Exploring a Direct Relationship between Students’ Problem-Solving Abilities and Academic Achievement: A STEM Education at a Coffee Plantation Area. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(2), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.22
Suson, R. L., Ermac, E. A., Anoos, W. G., Anero, M. B., Tomabiao, N. J. D., Taperla, I. M., Gantalao, L. C., Capuyan, M. D., Cortes, M. J. P., Belette, J. B., & Espina, R. C. (2020). Prototype learning activities: Road map to academic achievement. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(6), 1535–1543. https://doi.org/10.18844/CJES.V15I6.5296
Syarifuddin, Setyosari, P., Sulton, Kuswandi, D., & Sartika, D. (2020). The effect of the community of inquiry (COI) learning model and learning style towards social skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 569–578. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.569
Teo, P. (2019). Learning , Culture and Social Interaction Teaching for the 21st century : A case for dialogic pedagogy. 21(March), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.03.009
Thiagarajan S, Semmel, D S, Semmel, M. I. 1974. Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Childern. Indiana: Indiana University Bloomington.
Utami, L., & Amiruddin, A. (2018). Pengembangan Media Laboratorium Virtual Model 4D Pada Mata Kuliah Fisika. PHYDAGOGIC Jurnal Fisika Dan Pembelajarannya, 1(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.31605/phy.v1i1.212
Utomo, A. P., Hasanah, L., Hariyadi, S., Narulita, E., Suratno, & Umamah, N. (2020). The effectiveness of steam-based biotechnology module equipped with flash animation for biology learning in high school. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13232a
Widana, I. W. (2018). Higher Order Thinking Skills Assessment towards Critical Thinking on Mathematics Lesson. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH), 2(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v2n1.74
Wulandari, T. (2018). Field Trial Analysis of Teaching Material Civic Education Based on Problem Based Learning (PBL) to Improve Student’s Outcome. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 4(4), 259–265. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.4.4.259
Yunika, E., Iriani, T., & Saleh, R. (2020). Pengembangan Media Video Tutorial Berbasis Animasi Menggunakan 4D Untuk Mata Kuliah Praktik Batu Beton. Prosiding Snitt Poltekba, 299–306. https://jurnal.poltekba.ac.id/index.php/prosiding/article/view/1035
Yusuf, I., Widyaningsih, S. W., & Sebayang, S. R. B. (2018). Implementation of E-learning based-STEM on quantum physics subject to student HOTS ability. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(Special Issue), 67–75. https://tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/690

Downloads

Published

2022-04-07

How to Cite

Anggraeni, R. E., Suratno, S., & Narulita, E. (2022). The validity and practicality of the SEDC learning model in enhance student’s higher order thinking skills in science learning. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 15(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.21616