Analysis of scientific argumentation skills of prospective biology teacher students in inquiry-oriented laboratory activities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.34021Keywords:
Inquiry laboratory activities, Prospective biology teacher students, Scientific argumentationAbstract
Laboratory activities are essential and meaningful in science learning, especially biology. However, students often have no sufficient understanding of what is being practiced, beside they do not use their sklills to solve problems in the field of biology. Scientific argumentation is one of the skills that a prospective science teacher needs to develop and needs to be trained so that prospective teachers have experience and skills to apply when they become teachers later. The scientific argumentation skills in laboratory activities needs to be trained to provide training to students to use the results of laboratory activity to answer problems in the field of biology. This study aims to apply inquiry-oriented laboratory activities that focus on scientific argumentation in laboratory courses and to analyze the quality of scientific arguments of prospective biology teacher students during laboratory activities. The method used in this study is mixed methods research type exploratoryy which combines qualitative and quantitative approaches with complementarity. The research subject is a prospective student of a 5th semester biology teacher who takes microbiology courses. The results showed that the application of scientific argumentation in laboratory activity was carried out in 3 stages, namely initial discussion, experiment, observation and final discussion after experiment. The results of the analysis of the quality of scientific argumentation show that the argumentation skills of some students is at the middle level. The conclusion of this laboratory activity shows that students' scientific argumentation skills can develop well if they have the opportunity to discuss critically by using experimental data and their knowledge obtained from literature studies.
References
Abed, A. R., & Hussein, I. M. (2016). In vitro study of antibacterial and antifungal activity of some common antiseptics and disinfectants agents. Kufa Journal For Veterinary Medical Sciences, 7(1B), 148-159. https://doi.org/10.36326/kjvs/2016/v7i1B4255
Alberta Learning, E. (2004). Focus on inquiry: A teacher's guide to implementing inquiry-based learning. ERIC-Clearinghouse. http://www.learning.gov.ab.ca/k_12/curriculum/bysubject/focusoninquiry.pdf
Allchin, D., & Zemplén, G. Á. (2020). Finding the place of argumentation in science education: Epistemics and Whole Science. Science education, 104(5), 907-933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21589
Alhamadani, Y. S. T., & Oudah, A. S. (2022). Study of the Bacterial Sensitivity to different Antibiotics which are isolated from patients with UTI using Kirby-Bauer Method. Journal of Biomedicine and Biochemistry, 1(2). onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/cas.14993?download=true
Aydeniz, M., & Ozdilek, Z. (2015). Assessing Pre-Service Science Teachers' Understanding of Scientific Argumentation: What Do They Know about Argumentation after Four Years of College Science?. Science Education International, 26(2), 217-239. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1064033.pdf
Baroudi, S., & Rodjan Helder, M. (2021). Behind the scenes: teachers’ perspectives on factors affecting the implementation of inquiry-based science instruction. Research in Science & Technological Education, 39(1), 68-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1651259
Bathgate, M., Crowell, A., Schunn, C., Cannady, M., & Dorph, R. (2015). The learning benefits of being willing and able to engage in scientific argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1590-1612. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1045958
Belga, J. M. (2022). Improving Students’ Science Process Skills Using Argument-Driven-Inquiry (ADI) Laboratory Method. Asian Journal of Physical and Chemical Sciences, 10(2), 42-49. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajopacs/2022/v10i2180
Cetin, P.S.; Dogan, N & Kutluca, A.Y. (2014). The Quality of Pre-service Science Teachers’ Argumentation: Influence of Content Knowledge. J Sci Teac. Educ. 25:309–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9378-z
Chen, Y. C., Hand, B., & Park, S. (2016). Examining elementary students’ development of oral and written argumentation practices through argument-based inquiry. Science & Education, 25, 277-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9811-0
Chen, Y.C. & Steenhoek, J. (2014). Arguing Like A Scientist: Engaging Students In Core Scientific Practices. The American Biology Teacher 76 (4): 231-237. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2014.76.4.3
Clark, D., Sampson, V., Stegmann, K., Marttunen, M., Kollar, I., Janssen, J., & Laurinen, L. (2009). Scaffolding scientific argumentation between multiple students in online learning environments to support the development of 21st century skills. In the National Academies’ Board on Science Education workshop on Exploring the Intersection of Science Education and 21st Century Skills, the National Institutes of Health Office of Science Education (pp. 1-44).
Creswell, J. W. & V.L. Plano-Clark. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.
Du Boulay, D. (2012). Argument in Reading: What does it Involve and How can Students Become Better Critical Readers? Teaching in Higher Education 4, 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251990040201
Duda, H. J., Susilo, H., & Newcombe, P. (2019). Enhancing different ethnicity science process skills: Problem-based learning through practicum and authentic assessment. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1207-1222. http://repository.persadakhatulistiwa.ac.id/id/eprint/96
Duran, M., & Dökme, I. (2016). The effect of the inquiry-based learning approach on student's critical-thinking skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 12(12). http://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02311a
Ecevit, T., & Kaptan, F. (2022). The Efficiency of Argument-Based Inquiry Practices in Science Teacher Candidate Education. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 15(4), 721-757. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1070893
Effendi-Hasibuan, M. H., & Mukminin, A. (2019). The inquiry-based teaching instruction (IbTI) in Indonesian secondary education: What makes science teachers successful enact the curriculum?. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 18-33. https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/202/158
Erduran, S. & Jiménez, M, P. (2007). Argumentation in Science Education. Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research. Science & Technology Education Library. Volume 35.
Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2005). The role of argumentation in developing scientific literacy. Research and the quality of science education, 381-394. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/1-4020-3673-6_30
Erkmen, O. (2021). Laboratory practices in microbiology. Academic Press.
Eronen, M. I., & Romeijn, J. W. (2020). Philosophy of science and the formalization of psychological theory. Theory & Psychology, 30(6), 786-799. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320969876
Faize, F. A., Husain, W., & Nisar, F. (2017). A critical review of scientific argumentation in science education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 475-483. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80353
Fan, Y. C., Wang, T. H., & Wang, K. H. (2020). Studying the effectiveness of an online argumentation model for improving undergraduate students' argumentation ability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(4), 526-539. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12420
Furtak, E. M., & Penuel, W. R. (2019). Coming to terms: Addressing the persistence of “hands‐on” and other reform terminology in the era of science as practice. Science education, 103(1), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21488
Gericke, N., Högström, P., & Wallin, J. (2023). A systematic review of research on laboratory work in secondary school. Studies in sci. educ., 59(2),245-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2022.2090125
Giri, V., & Paily, M. U. (2020). Effect of scientific argumentation on the development of critical thinking. Science & Education, 29(3), 673-690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00120-y
Gouvea, J., Appleby, L., Fu, L., & Wagh, A. (2022). Motivating and shaping scientific argumentation in lab reports. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(4), ar71. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-11-0316
Gray, Ron & Nam-Hwa Kang. (2014). The Structure of Scientific Arguments by Secondary Science Teachers: Comparison of Experimental and Historical Science Topics. International Journal of Science Education. 36:1, 46-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.715779
Gultepe, N., & Kilic, Z. (2015). Effect of Scientific Argumentation on the Development of Scientific Process Skills in the Context of Teaching Chemistry. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(1), 111-132. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1060989.pdf
Henderson, J. B., McNeill, K. L., González‐Howard, M., Close, K., & Evans, M. (2018). Key challenges and future directions for educational research on scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21412
Heno, F., Azoulay, Z., Khalfin, B., Craddock, H. A., Silberstein, E., Moran-Gilad, J., & Rapaport, H. (2021). Comparing the antimicrobial effect of silver ion-coated silicone and gentamicin-irrigated silicone sheets from breast implant material. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 45(6), 2980-2989. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00266-021-02348-7
Hofstein, A., & Kind, P. M. (2012). Learning in and from science laboratories. Second international handbook of science education, 189-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_15
Hollihan, T. A., & Baaske, K. T. (2022). Arguments and arguing: The products and process of human decision making. Waveland Press.
Hosbein, K., & Walker, J. (2022). Assessment of scientific practice proficiency and content understanding following an inquiry-based laboratory course. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(12), 3833-3841. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00578
Houghton, D., Soles, G., Vogelsang, A., Irvine, V., Prince, F., Prince, L., ... & Paskevicius, M. (2022, December). Truth and Reconciliation Through Inquiry-based Collaborative Learning. In The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Conference (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1-8). https://doi.org/10.18357/otessac.2022.2.1.126
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Erduran, S. (2007). Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research, chap. Argumentation in Science Education: An Overview.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Puig, B. (2012). Argumentation, evidence evaluation and critical thinking. Second international handbook of science education, 1001-1015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_66
Kapici, H. O., Akcay, H., & Koca, E. E. (2022). Comparison of the quality of written scientific arguments in different laboratory environments. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(1), 69-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10147-w
Kirkup, L., Varadharajan, M., & Braun, M. (2016). A Comparison of student and demonstrator perceptions of laboratory-based, inquiry-oriented learning experiences. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 24(2). https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/CAL/article/view/9034
Kolbe, T., Steele, C., & White, B. (2020). Time to teach: Instructional time and science teachers’ use of inquiry-oriented instructional practices. Teachers College Record, 122(12), 1-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012201211
Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (2014). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. In Learning Through Problem Solving (pp. 313-350). Psychology Press.
Kuhn, D. (2019). Critical thinking as discourse. Human Development, 62(3), 146-164. https://doi.org/10.1159/000500171
Kutluca, A.Y.; P.S. Cetin & N. Dogan. 2014. Effect Of Content Knowledge On Scientific Argumentation Quality: Cloning Context. Necatibey Faculty of Ed. Electronic Journal of Sci. and Math. Education Vol. 8, Issue 1, June 2014, pp. 1-30. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=ec4498e0f34d29b724ba1ddff9567499b5ed7385
Lin, S. S. (2014). Science and non-science undergraduate students’critical thinking and argumentation performance in reading a science news report. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12, 1023-1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9451-7
Lunetta, V. N., Hofstein, A., & Clough, M. P. (2007). Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: An analysis of research, theory, and practice. Handbook of research on science education, 2, 393-441.
Manz, E., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2020). Rethinking the classroom science investigation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(7), 1148-1174. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21625
Martín-Gámez, C., & Erduran, S. (2018). Understanding argumentation about socio-scientific issues on energy: a quantitative study with primary pre-service teachers in Spain. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(4), 463-483. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1427568
McNeill, K. L., & Knight, A. M. (2013). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of scientific argumentation: The impact of professional development on K–12 teachers. Science Education, 97(6), 936-972. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21081
McDonnell, G. E. (2020). Antisepsis, disinfection, and sterilization: types, action, and resistance. John Wiley & Sons.
Millar, R. (2004). The Role of Practical Work in the Teaching and Learning of Science. Paper prepared for the Committee: High School Science Laboratories: Role and Vision, National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC. York: University of York.
Murray, P. R., Rosenthal, K. S., & Pfaller, M. A. (2015). Medical microbiology. Elsevier Health Sciences.
National Research Council, (1996). National Science Education Standards. ISBN: 0-309-54985-X, 272 pages, 8 1/4 x 10 1/2, http://www.nap.edu/catalog/4962.html
Noroozi, O., Kirschner, P. A., Biemans, H. J., & Mulder, M. (2018). Promoting argumentation competence: Extending from first-to second-order scaffolding through adaptive fading. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 153-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9400-z
Novaes, C. D. (2021). Argument and argumentation. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/chinese-logic-language/
Nückles, M., Roelle, J., Glogger-Frey, I., Waldeyer, J., & Renkl, A. (2020). The self-regulation-view in writing-to-learn: Using journal writing to optimize cognitive load in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 32(4), 1089-1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09541-1
Nussbaum, E. M. (2021). Critical integrative argumentation: Toward complexity in students’ thinking. Educational Psychologist, 56(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1845173
Nussbaum, E. Michael, Gale M. Sinatra & Marissa C. Owens. (2012). Chapter 2. The Two Faces of Scientific Argumentation: Application to Global Climate Change. Dalam Khine, Myint Swe (ed) Perspective on Scientific Argumentation: Theory, Practice and Research. Springer, New York.
OECD (2014). PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014), PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201118-en
Oren, A. (2015). Teaching microbiology to undergraduate students in the humanities and the social sciences. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 362(19), fnv162. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnv162
Ozdem, Y.; Ertepinar H., Cakiroglu, J. & Erduran, S. (2013). The Nature of Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Argumentation in Inquiry-Oriented Laboratory Context. International Journal of Science Education. 35:15, 2559-2586. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.611835
Passmore, C. M., & Svoboda, J. (2012). Exploring opportunities for argumentation in modelling classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1535-1554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.577842
Reza, Z. M., Mohammad, A., Salomeh, K., Reza, A. G., Hossein, S., Maryam, S., ... & Saeed, F. (2014). Rapid detection of coliforms in drinking water of Arak city using multiplex PCR method in comparison with the standard method of culture (Most Probably Number). Asian Pacific journal of tropical biomedicine, 4(5), 404-409. https://doi.org/10.12980/APJTB.4.2014C896
Rodriguez, J. M. G., Hunter, K. H., Scharlott, L. J., & Becker, N. M. (2020). A review of research on process oriented guided inquiry learning: Implications for research and practice. Journal of chemical education, 97(10), 3506-3520. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00355
Roviati, E., Widodo, A., Purwianingsih, W., & Riandi, R. (2019). Development of argumentation-based critical thinking skills tests in microbiology laboratory. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 8(1), 76-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v8i1.475
Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2023). Learning to teach science. In Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1162-1196). Routledge.
Salybekova, N., Issayev, G., Abdrassulova, Z., Bostanova, A., Dairabaev, R., & Erdenov, M. (2021). Pupils' Research Skills Development through Project-Based Learning in Biology. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(3), 1106-1121. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1309234.pdf
Sampson, V. & M. R. Blanchard. (2012). Science Teachers and Scientific Argumentation: Trends in Views and Practices. J. of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9). 1122-1148. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21037
Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2011). Argument‐Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study. Science Education, 95(2), 217-257. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20421
Saputra, I. G. P. E., Harnipa, H., & Akhfar, M. (2021). Development of science learning device oriented guided inquiry with virtual laboratory to train science process skills of junior high school students in Kendari. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.07102
Sengul, O., Enderle, P. J., & Schwartz, R. S. (2020). Science teachers’ use of argumentation instructional model: linking PCK of argumentation, epistemological beliefs, and practice. International Journal of Science Education, 42(7), 1068-1086. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1748250
Sevinc, B., Ozmen, H., & Yigit, N. (2011). Investigation of Primary Students' Motivation Levels towards Science Learning. Science Education International, 22(3), 218-232. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ941695.pdf
Shakya, B., Shrestha, S. R., & Silvanus, V. (2021). Bacteriological Examination of Water supply and Drinking Water at Household level in Makalbari Area by the Most Probable Number Method. Nepal Medical College Journal, 23(2), 146-152. https://doi.org/10.3126/nmcj.v23i2.38525
Sitohang, J. (2017). Penerapan metode tanya jawab untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar IPA pada siswa sekolah dasar. Suara Guru, 3(4), 681-688. http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/suara%20guru.v3i4.4851
Smith, E. M., Stein, M. M., & Holmes, N. G. (2020). How expectations of confirmation influence students’ experimentation decisions in introductory labs. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1), 010113. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010113
Sudigdo, A., & Setiawan, B. (2020). Level of inquiry in senior high school Central Java, Indonesia. Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, 12, 2838-845. http://dx.doi.org/10.21009/1.06212
Tang, K. S. (2022). Material inquiry and transformation as prerequisite processes of scientific argumentation: Toward a social‐material theory of argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(6), 969-1009. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/tea.21749
Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Valls-Bautista, C., Solé-LLussà, A., & Casanoves, M. (2021). Pre-service teachers' acquisition of scientific knowledge and scientific skills through inquiry-based laboratory activity. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 11(5), 1160-1179. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-07-2020-0161
Van Lacum, EB., MA. Ossevoort & MJ. Goedhart. (2014). A Teaching Strategy with a Focus on Argumentation to Improve Undergraduate Students’ Ability to Read Research Articles. CBE-Life Sciences Education, Vol.13, 253-264. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-06-0110
Von der Mühlen, S., Richter, T., Schmid, S., Schmidt, E. M., & Berthold, K. (2016). Judging the plausibility of arguments in scientific texts: a student–scientist comparison. Thinking & Reasoning, 22(2), 221-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.1127289
Wibowo, Y., Kurniawati, A., & Handziko, R. C. (2019, June). Competency of pre-service biology teachers on the academic and pedagogical aspects. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1241, No. 1, p. 012059). IOP Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012059
Woolnough, B. E. and Allsop, T. (1985). Practical Work in Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yalcinoglu, P. (2007). Evolution as Represented through Argumentation: A qualitative Study on Reasoning and Argumentation in High School Biology Teaching Practices. Dissertation Abstracts International, 68(09). http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1190123554
Alberta Learning, E. (2004). Focus on inquiry: A teacher's guide to implementing inquiry-based learning. ERIC-Clearinghouse. http://www.learning.gov.ab.ca/k_12/curriculum/bysubject/focusoninquiry.pdf
Allchin, D., & Zemplén, G. Á. (2020). Finding the place of argumentation in science education: Epistemics and Whole Science. Science education, 104(5), 907-933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21589
Alhamadani, Y. S. T., & Oudah, A. S. (2022). Study of the Bacterial Sensitivity to different Antibiotics which are isolated from patients with UTI using Kirby-Bauer Method. Journal of Biomedicine and Biochemistry, 1(2). onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/cas.14993?download=true
Aydeniz, M., & Ozdilek, Z. (2015). Assessing Pre-Service Science Teachers' Understanding of Scientific Argumentation: What Do They Know about Argumentation after Four Years of College Science?. Science Education International, 26(2), 217-239. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1064033.pdf
Baroudi, S., & Rodjan Helder, M. (2021). Behind the scenes: teachers’ perspectives on factors affecting the implementation of inquiry-based science instruction. Research in Science & Technological Education, 39(1), 68-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1651259
Bathgate, M., Crowell, A., Schunn, C., Cannady, M., & Dorph, R. (2015). The learning benefits of being willing and able to engage in scientific argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1590-1612. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1045958
Belga, J. M. (2022). Improving Students’ Science Process Skills Using Argument-Driven-Inquiry (ADI) Laboratory Method. Asian Journal of Physical and Chemical Sciences, 10(2), 42-49. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajopacs/2022/v10i2180
Cetin, P.S.; Dogan, N & Kutluca, A.Y. (2014). The Quality of Pre-service Science Teachers’ Argumentation: Influence of Content Knowledge. J Sci Teac. Educ. 25:309–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9378-z
Chen, Y. C., Hand, B., & Park, S. (2016). Examining elementary students’ development of oral and written argumentation practices through argument-based inquiry. Science & Education, 25, 277-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9811-0
Chen, Y.C. & Steenhoek, J. (2014). Arguing Like A Scientist: Engaging Students In Core Scientific Practices. The American Biology Teacher 76 (4): 231-237. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2014.76.4.3
Clark, D., Sampson, V., Stegmann, K., Marttunen, M., Kollar, I., Janssen, J., & Laurinen, L. (2009). Scaffolding scientific argumentation between multiple students in online learning environments to support the development of 21st century skills. In the National Academies’ Board on Science Education workshop on Exploring the Intersection of Science Education and 21st Century Skills, the National Institutes of Health Office of Science Education (pp. 1-44).
Creswell, J. W. & V.L. Plano-Clark. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.
Du Boulay, D. (2012). Argument in Reading: What does it Involve and How can Students Become Better Critical Readers? Teaching in Higher Education 4, 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251990040201
Duda, H. J., Susilo, H., & Newcombe, P. (2019). Enhancing different ethnicity science process skills: Problem-based learning through practicum and authentic assessment. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1207-1222. http://repository.persadakhatulistiwa.ac.id/id/eprint/96
Duran, M., & Dökme, I. (2016). The effect of the inquiry-based learning approach on student's critical-thinking skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 12(12). http://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02311a
Ecevit, T., & Kaptan, F. (2022). The Efficiency of Argument-Based Inquiry Practices in Science Teacher Candidate Education. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 15(4), 721-757. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1070893
Effendi-Hasibuan, M. H., & Mukminin, A. (2019). The inquiry-based teaching instruction (IbTI) in Indonesian secondary education: What makes science teachers successful enact the curriculum?. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 18-33. https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/202/158
Erduran, S. & Jiménez, M, P. (2007). Argumentation in Science Education. Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research. Science & Technology Education Library. Volume 35.
Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2005). The role of argumentation in developing scientific literacy. Research and the quality of science education, 381-394. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/1-4020-3673-6_30
Erkmen, O. (2021). Laboratory practices in microbiology. Academic Press.
Eronen, M. I., & Romeijn, J. W. (2020). Philosophy of science and the formalization of psychological theory. Theory & Psychology, 30(6), 786-799. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320969876
Faize, F. A., Husain, W., & Nisar, F. (2017). A critical review of scientific argumentation in science education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 475-483. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80353
Fan, Y. C., Wang, T. H., & Wang, K. H. (2020). Studying the effectiveness of an online argumentation model for improving undergraduate students' argumentation ability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(4), 526-539. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12420
Furtak, E. M., & Penuel, W. R. (2019). Coming to terms: Addressing the persistence of “hands‐on” and other reform terminology in the era of science as practice. Science education, 103(1), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21488
Gericke, N., Högström, P., & Wallin, J. (2023). A systematic review of research on laboratory work in secondary school. Studies in sci. educ., 59(2),245-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2022.2090125
Giri, V., & Paily, M. U. (2020). Effect of scientific argumentation on the development of critical thinking. Science & Education, 29(3), 673-690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00120-y
Gouvea, J., Appleby, L., Fu, L., & Wagh, A. (2022). Motivating and shaping scientific argumentation in lab reports. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(4), ar71. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-11-0316
Gray, Ron & Nam-Hwa Kang. (2014). The Structure of Scientific Arguments by Secondary Science Teachers: Comparison of Experimental and Historical Science Topics. International Journal of Science Education. 36:1, 46-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.715779
Gultepe, N., & Kilic, Z. (2015). Effect of Scientific Argumentation on the Development of Scientific Process Skills in the Context of Teaching Chemistry. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(1), 111-132. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1060989.pdf
Henderson, J. B., McNeill, K. L., González‐Howard, M., Close, K., & Evans, M. (2018). Key challenges and future directions for educational research on scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21412
Heno, F., Azoulay, Z., Khalfin, B., Craddock, H. A., Silberstein, E., Moran-Gilad, J., & Rapaport, H. (2021). Comparing the antimicrobial effect of silver ion-coated silicone and gentamicin-irrigated silicone sheets from breast implant material. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 45(6), 2980-2989. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00266-021-02348-7
Hofstein, A., & Kind, P. M. (2012). Learning in and from science laboratories. Second international handbook of science education, 189-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_15
Hollihan, T. A., & Baaske, K. T. (2022). Arguments and arguing: The products and process of human decision making. Waveland Press.
Hosbein, K., & Walker, J. (2022). Assessment of scientific practice proficiency and content understanding following an inquiry-based laboratory course. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(12), 3833-3841. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00578
Houghton, D., Soles, G., Vogelsang, A., Irvine, V., Prince, F., Prince, L., ... & Paskevicius, M. (2022, December). Truth and Reconciliation Through Inquiry-based Collaborative Learning. In The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Conference (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1-8). https://doi.org/10.18357/otessac.2022.2.1.126
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Erduran, S. (2007). Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research, chap. Argumentation in Science Education: An Overview.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Puig, B. (2012). Argumentation, evidence evaluation and critical thinking. Second international handbook of science education, 1001-1015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_66
Kapici, H. O., Akcay, H., & Koca, E. E. (2022). Comparison of the quality of written scientific arguments in different laboratory environments. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(1), 69-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10147-w
Kirkup, L., Varadharajan, M., & Braun, M. (2016). A Comparison of student and demonstrator perceptions of laboratory-based, inquiry-oriented learning experiences. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 24(2). https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/CAL/article/view/9034
Kolbe, T., Steele, C., & White, B. (2020). Time to teach: Instructional time and science teachers’ use of inquiry-oriented instructional practices. Teachers College Record, 122(12), 1-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012201211
Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (2014). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. In Learning Through Problem Solving (pp. 313-350). Psychology Press.
Kuhn, D. (2019). Critical thinking as discourse. Human Development, 62(3), 146-164. https://doi.org/10.1159/000500171
Kutluca, A.Y.; P.S. Cetin & N. Dogan. 2014. Effect Of Content Knowledge On Scientific Argumentation Quality: Cloning Context. Necatibey Faculty of Ed. Electronic Journal of Sci. and Math. Education Vol. 8, Issue 1, June 2014, pp. 1-30. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=ec4498e0f34d29b724ba1ddff9567499b5ed7385
Lin, S. S. (2014). Science and non-science undergraduate students’critical thinking and argumentation performance in reading a science news report. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12, 1023-1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9451-7
Lunetta, V. N., Hofstein, A., & Clough, M. P. (2007). Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: An analysis of research, theory, and practice. Handbook of research on science education, 2, 393-441.
Manz, E., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2020). Rethinking the classroom science investigation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(7), 1148-1174. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21625
Martín-Gámez, C., & Erduran, S. (2018). Understanding argumentation about socio-scientific issues on energy: a quantitative study with primary pre-service teachers in Spain. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(4), 463-483. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1427568
McNeill, K. L., & Knight, A. M. (2013). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of scientific argumentation: The impact of professional development on K–12 teachers. Science Education, 97(6), 936-972. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21081
McDonnell, G. E. (2020). Antisepsis, disinfection, and sterilization: types, action, and resistance. John Wiley & Sons.
Millar, R. (2004). The Role of Practical Work in the Teaching and Learning of Science. Paper prepared for the Committee: High School Science Laboratories: Role and Vision, National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC. York: University of York.
Murray, P. R., Rosenthal, K. S., & Pfaller, M. A. (2015). Medical microbiology. Elsevier Health Sciences.
National Research Council, (1996). National Science Education Standards. ISBN: 0-309-54985-X, 272 pages, 8 1/4 x 10 1/2, http://www.nap.edu/catalog/4962.html
Noroozi, O., Kirschner, P. A., Biemans, H. J., & Mulder, M. (2018). Promoting argumentation competence: Extending from first-to second-order scaffolding through adaptive fading. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 153-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9400-z
Novaes, C. D. (2021). Argument and argumentation. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/chinese-logic-language/
Nückles, M., Roelle, J., Glogger-Frey, I., Waldeyer, J., & Renkl, A. (2020). The self-regulation-view in writing-to-learn: Using journal writing to optimize cognitive load in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 32(4), 1089-1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09541-1
Nussbaum, E. M. (2021). Critical integrative argumentation: Toward complexity in students’ thinking. Educational Psychologist, 56(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1845173
Nussbaum, E. Michael, Gale M. Sinatra & Marissa C. Owens. (2012). Chapter 2. The Two Faces of Scientific Argumentation: Application to Global Climate Change. Dalam Khine, Myint Swe (ed) Perspective on Scientific Argumentation: Theory, Practice and Research. Springer, New York.
OECD (2014). PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014), PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201118-en
Oren, A. (2015). Teaching microbiology to undergraduate students in the humanities and the social sciences. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 362(19), fnv162. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnv162
Ozdem, Y.; Ertepinar H., Cakiroglu, J. & Erduran, S. (2013). The Nature of Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Argumentation in Inquiry-Oriented Laboratory Context. International Journal of Science Education. 35:15, 2559-2586. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.611835
Passmore, C. M., & Svoboda, J. (2012). Exploring opportunities for argumentation in modelling classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1535-1554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.577842
Reza, Z. M., Mohammad, A., Salomeh, K., Reza, A. G., Hossein, S., Maryam, S., ... & Saeed, F. (2014). Rapid detection of coliforms in drinking water of Arak city using multiplex PCR method in comparison with the standard method of culture (Most Probably Number). Asian Pacific journal of tropical biomedicine, 4(5), 404-409. https://doi.org/10.12980/APJTB.4.2014C896
Rodriguez, J. M. G., Hunter, K. H., Scharlott, L. J., & Becker, N. M. (2020). A review of research on process oriented guided inquiry learning: Implications for research and practice. Journal of chemical education, 97(10), 3506-3520. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00355
Roviati, E., Widodo, A., Purwianingsih, W., & Riandi, R. (2019). Development of argumentation-based critical thinking skills tests in microbiology laboratory. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 8(1), 76-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v8i1.475
Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2023). Learning to teach science. In Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1162-1196). Routledge.
Salybekova, N., Issayev, G., Abdrassulova, Z., Bostanova, A., Dairabaev, R., & Erdenov, M. (2021). Pupils' Research Skills Development through Project-Based Learning in Biology. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(3), 1106-1121. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1309234.pdf
Sampson, V. & M. R. Blanchard. (2012). Science Teachers and Scientific Argumentation: Trends in Views and Practices. J. of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9). 1122-1148. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21037
Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2011). Argument‐Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study. Science Education, 95(2), 217-257. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20421
Saputra, I. G. P. E., Harnipa, H., & Akhfar, M. (2021). Development of science learning device oriented guided inquiry with virtual laboratory to train science process skills of junior high school students in Kendari. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.07102
Sengul, O., Enderle, P. J., & Schwartz, R. S. (2020). Science teachers’ use of argumentation instructional model: linking PCK of argumentation, epistemological beliefs, and practice. International Journal of Science Education, 42(7), 1068-1086. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1748250
Sevinc, B., Ozmen, H., & Yigit, N. (2011). Investigation of Primary Students' Motivation Levels towards Science Learning. Science Education International, 22(3), 218-232. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ941695.pdf
Shakya, B., Shrestha, S. R., & Silvanus, V. (2021). Bacteriological Examination of Water supply and Drinking Water at Household level in Makalbari Area by the Most Probable Number Method. Nepal Medical College Journal, 23(2), 146-152. https://doi.org/10.3126/nmcj.v23i2.38525
Sitohang, J. (2017). Penerapan metode tanya jawab untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar IPA pada siswa sekolah dasar. Suara Guru, 3(4), 681-688. http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/suara%20guru.v3i4.4851
Smith, E. M., Stein, M. M., & Holmes, N. G. (2020). How expectations of confirmation influence students’ experimentation decisions in introductory labs. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1), 010113. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010113
Sudigdo, A., & Setiawan, B. (2020). Level of inquiry in senior high school Central Java, Indonesia. Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, 12, 2838-845. http://dx.doi.org/10.21009/1.06212
Tang, K. S. (2022). Material inquiry and transformation as prerequisite processes of scientific argumentation: Toward a social‐material theory of argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(6), 969-1009. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/tea.21749
Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Valls-Bautista, C., Solé-LLussà, A., & Casanoves, M. (2021). Pre-service teachers' acquisition of scientific knowledge and scientific skills through inquiry-based laboratory activity. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 11(5), 1160-1179. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-07-2020-0161
Van Lacum, EB., MA. Ossevoort & MJ. Goedhart. (2014). A Teaching Strategy with a Focus on Argumentation to Improve Undergraduate Students’ Ability to Read Research Articles. CBE-Life Sciences Education, Vol.13, 253-264. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-06-0110
Von der Mühlen, S., Richter, T., Schmid, S., Schmidt, E. M., & Berthold, K. (2016). Judging the plausibility of arguments in scientific texts: a student–scientist comparison. Thinking & Reasoning, 22(2), 221-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.1127289
Wibowo, Y., Kurniawati, A., & Handziko, R. C. (2019, June). Competency of pre-service biology teachers on the academic and pedagogical aspects. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1241, No. 1, p. 012059). IOP Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012059
Woolnough, B. E. and Allsop, T. (1985). Practical Work in Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yalcinoglu, P. (2007). Evolution as Represented through Argumentation: A qualitative Study on Reasoning and Argumentation in High School Biology Teaching Practices. Dissertation Abstracts International, 68(09). http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1190123554
Downloads
Published
2024-06-24
How to Cite
Cahyani, D., Gloria, R. Y. ., & Roviati, E. (2024). Analysis of scientific argumentation skills of prospective biology teacher students in inquiry-oriented laboratory activities. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 17(1), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.34021
Issue
Section
Articles
License
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi (Biosferjpb) and Departement of Biology Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta as publisher of the journal.
