Comparative Characterization of Indonesian AISI 316L Stainless Steel and Commercial Femoral Stem for Artificial Hip Joint Applications

Authors

  • Mujib Wahyudi Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
  • Rifky Ismail Universitas Diponegoro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/JKEM.11.1.7

Keywords:

orthopedic implant, austenitic alloy, tensile behavior, hardness distribution, microstructure

Abstract

The development of the femoral stem, part of the artificial hip joint, requires a material with microstructures, mechanical properties, and chemical composition that meet the requirements of a medical implant. This study aims to characterize and compare Indonesian AISI 316L stainless steel with two commercial femoral stem implants used by patients, namely XYZ products from the United States and ABC products from India. The tests carried out on the three products include tensile tests, macro hardness, microhardness, microstructure observations, and chemical composition analysis. The tensile test results show that XYZ products have the highest ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of 1065.6 ± 11.7 MPa, while the Indonesian AISI 316L (IDN) and ABC products showed lower UTS values of 580.9 ± 0.3 and 536.3 ± 9.4 MPa, respectively. Microhardness tests showed that XYZ products achieved the highest hardness value of 306.0 ± 13.5 VHN with an increasing hardness gradient towards the surface. Meanwhile, the Indonesian AISI 316L materials showed a relatively homogeneous hardness distribution with an average value of approximately 197.5 ± 1.3 VHN. Observation of microstructures reveals differences in grain size and distribution, which correlate with microhardness values. Analysis of the elemental composition shows that all three materials exhibit characteristics of austenitic stainless steel with variations in the alloy element content. Overall, the results highlight the influence of microstructural features and alloy composition on mechanical performance. Although the Indonesian AISI 316L material evaluated in this study is not classified as implant-grade stainless steel, the findings provide a baseline reference for future material development. It emphasizes the need for strict compliance with implant-grade standards, manufacturing optimization, and surface treatment to enable potential application in femoral stem component.

References

[1] C. Thorson, K. Galicia, A. Burleson, O. Bouchard, D. Hoppensteadt, J. Fareed, and W. Hopkinson, “Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors and proteoglycan 4 in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty,” Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, vol. 25, pp. 1-9, 2019, doi: 10.1177/1076029619828113.

[2] S. Prasadh, V. Ratheesh, V. Manakari, G. Parande, M. Gupta, and R. Wong, “The potential of Magnesium based materials in mandibular reconstruction,” Metals, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 302, 2019, doi: 10.3390/met9030302.

[3] D. Avery, L. Morandini, N. Celt, L. Bergey, J. Simmons, R. K. Martin, H. J. Donahue, and R. O-. Navarrete, “Immune cell response to orthopedic and craniofacial biomaterials depends on biomaterial composition,” Acta Biomater., vol. 161, pp. 285–297, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.03.007.

[4] K. C. Lai, S. C. Chao, K. K. Tseng, J. W. Yeh, and P. Y. Chen, “Biocompatible as-cast and homogenized TiNbTaZrMoV high entropy alloys: mechanical properties, corrosion resistance and in vitro studies,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 24, pp. 9708–9721, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.201.

[5] S. Ali, M. Irfan, U. M. Niazi, A. M. A. Rani, A. Rashedi, S. Rahman, M. K. A. Khan, M. A. Alsaiari, S. Legutko, J. Petru, and A. Trefil, “Microstructure and mechanical properties of modified 316L stainless steel alloy for biomedical applications using powder metallurgy,” Materials, vol. 15, no. 8, p. 2822, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ma15082822.

[6] S. Attabi, A. Himour, L. Laouar, and A. Motallebzadeh, “Mechanical and wear behaviors of 316L stainless steel after ball burnishing treatment,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 15, pp. 3255–3267, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.09.081.

[7] A. M. Kumar, B. Suresh, S. Das, I. B. Obot, A. Y. Adesina, and S. Ramakrishna, “Promising bio-composites of polypyrrole and chitosan: surface protective and in vitro biocompatibility performance on 316L SS implants,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 173, pp. 121–130, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.05.083.

[8] G. Singh, Y. Lamichhane, A. S. Bhui, S. S. Sidhu, P. S. Bains, and P. Mukhiya, “Surface morphology and microhardness behavior of 316L in HAp-PMEDM,” Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 445–454, 2019, doi: 10.22190/FUME190510040S.

[9] M. A-. Amin, A. M. A-. Rani, M. Danish, F. T. Zohura, S. Rubaiee, R. Ahmed, S. Ali, and M. Sarikaya, “Analysis of hybrid HA/CNT suspended-EDM process and multiple-objectives optimization to improve machining responses of 316L steel,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 15, pp. 2557–2574, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.09.074.

[10] S. Tanhaei, K. Gheisari, and S. R. A. Zaree, “Effect of cold rolling on the microstructural, magnetic, mechanical, and corrosion properties of AISI 316L austenitic stainless steel,” International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, vol. 25, pp. 630–640, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s12613-018-1610-y.

[11] S. Mohammadzehi, H. Mirzadeh, M. J. Sohrabi, M. Roostaei, and R. Mahmudi, “Elucidating the effects of cold rolling route on the mechanical properties of AISI 316L austenitic stainless steel,” Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 865, p. 144616, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2023.144616.

[12] Y. Hong, G. Yin, Y. Zheng, W. Zhang, and Z. Wei, “Mechanisms of synergistically enhanced strength and plasticity in 316L stainless steel fabricated by laser powder bed fusion via cold rolling and annealing treatments,” Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 935, p. 148364, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2025.148364.

[13] H. Katiksiz and S. Gündüz, “Effect of grain size and deformation temperature on mechanical properties and failure Behaviour of 316l austenitic stainless steel,” Metallophysics and Advanced Technologies, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 673–688, 2021, doi: 10.15407/mfint.43.05.0673.

[14] O. A. Zambrano, B. I-. Guerrero, S. A. Rodríguez, and J. J. Coronado, “Running-in period during sliding wear of austenitic steels,” Tribology Letters, vol. 72, p. 70, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11249-024-01867-z.

[15] S. M Jafarpour, M. Mandel, L. Krüger, H. Biermann, and A. Dalke, “Functional properties of expanded austenite generated on AISI 316L by plasma nitrocarburizing using different active screen materials,” Materials Research Express, vol. 11, no. 11, p. 116501, 2024, doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/ad898b.

[16] D. M. Field, K. R. Limmer, and B. C. Hornbuckle, “On the grain growth kinetics of a low density steel,” Metals)., vol. 9, no. 9, p.997, 2019, doi: 10.3390/met9090997.

[17] M. S. Anwar, R. K. Melinia, M. G. Pradisti, and E. S. Siradj, “Effect of prior austenite grain-size on the annealing twin density and hardness in austenitic stainless steel,” International Journal of Technology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1149–1160, 2021, doi: 10.14716/ijtech.v12i6.5190.

[18] B. Blinn, M. Klein, C. Gläßner, M. Smaga, J. C. Aurich, and T. Beck, “An investigation of the microstructure and fatigue behavior of additively manufactured AISI 316L stainless steel with regard to the influence of heat treatment,” Metals, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 220, 2018, doi: 10.3390/met8040220.

[19] Y. Leng, D. Yang, P. Ming, B. Li, and C. Zhang, “Improvement of corrosion resistance and electrical conductivity of stainless steel 316L bipolar plate by pickling and passivation,” World Electric Vehicle Journal, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 101, 2021, doi: 10.3390/wevj12030101.

[20] H. Khanmohammadi, W. Wijanarko, and N. Espallargas, “The role of tribofilm chemical composition on wear of austenitic stainless steel lubricated with water-glycol containing ionic-liquids as additives,” Wear, vol. 520–521, p. 204672, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2023.204672.

[21] P. M. O. Silva, M. C. C. Filho, J. A. d. Cruz, A. J. M. Sales, A. S. B. Sombra, and J. M. R. S. Tavares, “Influence on pitting corrosion resistance of AISI 301LN and 316L stainless steels subjected to cold-induced deformation,” Metals, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 443, 2023, doi: 10.3390/met13030443.

[22] S. A. A. Maged and R. S. Hadi, “Improved corrosion resistance in biomaterial applications of the AISI 316L alloy,” Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 254–265, 2025, doi: 10.12913/22998624/207058.

[23] B. Kalandyk, R. Zapała, and M. Starowicz, “The Effect of Si and Mn on microstructure and selected properties of Cr-Ni stainless steels,” Archives of Foundry Engineering, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 192–196, 2017, doi: 10.1515/afe-2017-0034.

[24] R. Zhang, J. He, S. Xu, F. Zhang, and X. Wang, “The roles of Ce and Mn on solidification behaviors and mechanical properties of 7Mo super austenitic stainless steel,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 22, pp. 1238–1249, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.11.148.

[25] H. Pasiowiec, P. Ledwig, L. Ząbek, T. Kargul, P. L-. Graca, M. Wojtaszek, M. Gude, R. Stanik, J. Falkus, C. Leinenbach, and B. Dubiel, “Microstructure and mechanical properties of 316L/inconel 625 gradient multi-material additively manufactured by laser powder bed fusion,” Materials & Design, vol. 260, p. 115162, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2025.115162.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-31

How to Cite

[1]
M. Wahyudi and R. Ismail, “Comparative Characterization of Indonesian AISI 316L Stainless Steel and Commercial Femoral Stem for Artificial Hip Joint Applications ”, J. Konv. Ener. Manuf. , vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 65 – 77, Jan. 2026.

Issue

Section

Articles