Development of project based biotechnology teaching books

Authors

  • Hilarius Jago Duda Biology Education Study Program, STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia
  • F Rahayu Esti Wahyuni Biology Education Study Program, STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia
  • Antonius Edy Setyawan Computer Education Study Program, STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia
  • Markus Iyus Supiandi Biology Education Study Program, STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia
  • Yakobus Bustami Biology Education Study Program, STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.18003

Keywords:

Development, textbooks, biotechnology, project based

Abstract

Various research states that one of the causes of misconception is textbooks or printed media that are used as learning resources. This is because the textbooks developed are monotonous and tend to present theories in full without practicing skills or stimulating the ability to think and solve problems. The textbooks developed in the research are project-based biotechnology textbooks. This certainly can answer the demands of higher education in the era of industrial revolution 4.0 where learning should be able to empower cognitive, process skills, social skills, system skills, complex problem solving and others. The depth of the material and projects selected for each topic is seen with the results of the analysis of conceptual mastery and misconceptions found. The hope is that this project-based textbook can overcome these problems. The research methodology used is 4-D development research. The 4-D development research method consists of 4 main stages, namely: define, design, develop and disseminate. The subjects of the field trials were biology education students at STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang. The percentage of validation results for project-based biotechnology textbooks by material experts, media experts, and biotechnology lecturers is 3.75 so that the textbooks have very decent qualifications. The percentage of project validation results was 3.32 with the feasible category. This textbook was tested on biology education students at STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang at the initial development testing stage. The effectiveness of this textbook is seen from the gain score of 0.54 with moderate criteria, so that it can be declared effective.

References

Abidin. Yunus. (2014). Desain Sistem Pembelajaran dalam Konteks Kurikulum 2013, Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Amirudin, A., Baidowi, A., & Sumarmi S. (2015). Pengaruh Model Pembeajaran Berbasis Proyek Terhadap Kemampuan Menulis Karya Ilmiah Geografi Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi, 20(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um017v20i12015p048
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Boak, G. (1998). A complete guide to learning contract. Aldershot: Gower.
Chiapetta, Eugene. L. (1991). A Method to Quantify Major Themes Of Scientific Literacy in Science Textbooks. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching, 28 (8): 713-725. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280808
Cobanoglu EM & B Şahin. (2009). Underlining the problems in biology textbook for 10th grades in high school education using the suggestions of practicing teachers. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6 (2):75-91.
Daryanto. (2013). Menyusun Modul: Bahan Ajar untuk Persiapan Guru dalam Mengajar. Yogyakarta: Gava Media. 99.
Daryanto dan A. Dwicahyono. 2014. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran (Silabus, RPP, PHB, Bahan Ajar). Yogayakarta: Gava Media.. http://103.255.15.77/detail-opac?id=272838
Doppelt, Y. (2003). Implementation and Assesment of Project Based Learning (PBL) on the Web to Promote Cooperative Learning. European Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13 (1), 255-272. http://cedu521-k-f07.pbworks.com/f/Implementation+and+Assessment+of+Project-Based+Learning+in+a+Flexible+Environment.pdf
Doppelt, Y. (2005), Assessment of ProjectBased Learning in a Mechatronics Context. International Journal of Technology Education, 16 (2), 7-24. https://jte-journal.org/articles/10.21061/jte.v16i2.a.1/
Duda, (2017). Metode Praktikum dan Asesmennya (Practical Methods and Assessments). Penerbit: STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang.
Firdaus, 2008. Buku Pedoman Pembuatan Silabus. Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya, Edisi II.
Frey, B.B., Schmitt, V.L., Allen, J.P. (2012). Defining Authentic Classroom Assessment. Journal Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17 (02), 1-18. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ977576
Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st Century Skills: A Guide to Evaluating Mastery and Authentic Learning. California: Corwin.
Hamalik. (2009). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Holbrook J &M Rannikmae. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environment & Science Education, 4 (3):275-288. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ884397
Karwono. (2007). Pemanfaatan Sumber Belajar dalam Upaya Peningkatan Kualitas dan Hasil Pembelajaran. Makalah disampaikan dalam Seminar tentang Pemanfaatan Sumber Belajar tanggal 13 November 2007 di Metro. (online). Tersedia: https://karwono.wordpress.com/2007/11/09/seminar -sumber-belajar/. (4 November 2016).
Laksana, D.N.L., & Wawe, F. (2015). Penggunaan Media Berbasis Budaya Lokal dalam Pembelajaran IPA untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas Belajar dan Pemahaman Konsep IPA Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti, 2(1), 27-37.
Liu dan Hsiao. (2002). Middle School Students as Multimedia Designers: A Project-based Learning Approach. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(4), 311–37. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/9529/
Mahirah B. (2017). Evaluasi Belajar Peserta Didik (Siswa). Jurnal Idaarah, I (2). https://doi.org/10.24252/idaarah.v1i2.4269
Nasution, W.N. (2017). Perencanaan Pembelajaran: Pengertian, Tujuan dan Prosedur. ITTIHAD, I (2). https://ejournal-ittihad.alittihadiyahsumut.or.id/index.php/ittihad/article/view/23
Nurdyansyah, N., Rais, P., & Aini, Q. (2017). The Role of Education Technology in Mathematic of Third Grade Students in MI Ma’arif Pademonegoro Sukodono. Madrosatuna. Journal of Islamic Elementary School, 1(1), 37-46. https://madrosatuna.umsida.ac.id/index.php/Madrosatuna/article/view/1535
Nurdyansyah, N. (2018). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Modul Ilmu Pengetahuan Alambagi Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo.
Palm, T. (2008). Performance Assesment and Authentic Assesment: A Conceptual Analysis ot the Literature. Practical Assesment, Research, and Evaluation a Peer Reviewed Electronic Journal, 3 (4), 1-11. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1201&context=pare
Prastowo, A. (2015). Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif. Yogyakarta: Diva Pres.
Purwaningsih, E., Fadiawati, N., & Kadaritna, N. (2014). Penggunaan Pendekatan Scientific pada Pembelajaran Kesetimbangan Kimia dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Elaborasi. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Kimia, 3 (1), 1-14. http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/JPK/article/view/4534
Safitri, D. (2014). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Matakuliah Biologi Sel pada Program Studi Pendididkan Biologi di Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.
Santi, T.K. (2011). Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek (Project Based Learning) untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Mata Kuliah Fisiologi Tumbuhan. Jurnal Ilmiah PROGRESIF, 7 (21).
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Taroreh B.S., Sugiharto & Soekardi. (2012). Model Performance Assesment of Learning Outcomes of Volley Ball in Elementary School. Journal of Physical Education and Sports, 1(2) 123-130. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpes/article/view/806
Tiemensma, Leone.2009. Visual literacy: to comics or not to comics? Promoting literacy using comics.World Library And Information Congress: 75th Ifla General Conference And Council, 1(1), 1-9. Retrieved from http://www.ifla.org/annual-conference/ifla75/index.htm.
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D.S. & Semmel, M.L. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children. Minnesota: Indiana University.
Udeani, U. (2013). Quatitative analysis of secondary school biology textbooks for scienctific literacy themes. Research Journal in Organizational Psychology & Education Studies, 2 (1): 39-43.
Walter Dick & Lou Carey. (2005). The systemtic Design of Instruction (6thed). (Boston MA: Pearson, 2005), hlm. 165.
Wenning, C. J. (2011). The Levels Of Inquiry Model Of Science Teaching. Jurnal Of Physics Teacher Education Online, 06 (02). http://www2.phy.ilstu.edu/pte/publications/LOI-model-of-science-teaching.pdf

Downloads

Published

2022-10-22

How to Cite

Duda, H. J. ., Wahyuni, F. R. E., Setyawan, A. E., Supiandi, M. I., & Bustami, Y. (2022). Development of project based biotechnology teaching books. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 15(2), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.18003

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 2 (2022): Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi

Section

Articles

License

The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi (Biosferjpb) and Departement of Biology Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta as publisher of the journal.