Rasch model: Quality of final semester assessment items for class x on biology subject

Authors

  • Bekti Isnaeni Biology Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia
  • Nani Aprilia Biology Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia
  • Much Fuad Saifuddin Biology Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.23326

Keywords:

Final semester Assessment, MCML, Multiple-Choice Card Review, Rasch Model, Winsteps

Abstract

The Final The quality of the question item is important to know to produce more accurate measurements. Final Semester Assessment questions have not been analyzed, and many students still have not passed the Minimum Criterion of Mastery Learning (MCML). This research aims to determine the quality of the question items in the Final Semester Assessment of State High School in the Gondokusuman District. This research uses a quantitative descriptive approach. The population and sample in this study were the answer sheets of all students of class X MIPA at 6th and 9th State Senior High School Yogyakarta in the 2020/2021 school year, which amounted to 462 sheets. Sampling techniques used saturated samples. The data collection procedures were observation and documentation; The analysis was quantitative descriptive. Research results showed the results as 1) there is a difference in the level of question validity of the two schools; 2) The reliability of the questions whether by 6th and 9th State Senior High School Yogyakarta had excellent value; 3) The difficulty level of questions at SMA N 6 Yogyakarta is higher than SMA N 9 Yogyakarta; 4) Differentiating level of the questions by 6th State Senior High School Yogyakarta was seven groups of questions and the questions by 9th State Senior High School Yogyakarta was 11 groups of questions; 5) The effectiveness of distracting questions at 6th and 9th State Senior High School Yogyakarta is not practical; 6) The suitability of the questions with the material and construction aspects of the questions at SMA N 9 Yogyakarta is better than SMA N 6 Yogyakarta.

References

Alfarisa, F., & Purnama, D. N. (2019). Analisis butir soal ulangan akhir semester mata pelajaran ekonomi SMA menggunakan Rasch model. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 11(2), 366–374. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPE/article/view/20878
Ambiyar, & Panyahuti. (2020). Asesmen pembelajaran berbasis komputer dan android (Pertama). Prenada Media.
American Educational Research Association. (2014). The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. American Educational Research Association.
Arikunto, S. (2018). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. PT Bumi Aksara.
Arvianto, I. R. (2016). Pemanfaatan program Iteman 3.0 untuk analisis butir soal lomba cerdas cermat teknologi informasi dan komunikasi tingkat SMA sederajat. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi, XI(33), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.35842/jtir.v11i33.106
Azizah, A., & Wahyuningsih, S. (2020). Penggunaan model rasch untuk analisis instrumen tes pada mata kuliah matematika aktuaria. JUPITEK: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.30598/jupitekvol3iss1pp45-50
Bulqis, A. (2019). Analisis butir soal pilihan ganda biasa ulangan tengah semester buatan guru Biologi kelas X SMA Negeri 3 Maros. Prosiding Seminar Nasional FKIP Universitas Muslim Maros, 1, 191–197. https://ejournals.umma.ac.id/index.php/prosiding/article/view/377/267
Case, S. M., & Donahue, B. E. (2008). Developing high-quality multiple choice questions or assessment in Legal Education. Journal of Legal Education, 58(3), 372–387. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42894078
Erfan, M., Maulyda, M. A., Hidayati, V. R., Astria, F. P., & Ratu, T. (2020). Analisis kualitas soal kemampuan membedakan rangkaian seri dan paralel melalui teori tes klasik dan model Rasch. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 3(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v3i1.24080
Febriani, I. M. (2016). Analisis butir soal ujian akhir semester (UAS) bahasa jerman kelas X MIA 6 SMA negeri 1 maospati tahun ajaran 2015/2016. Laterne E-Jurnal UNESA, 5(2). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/230655215.pdf
Hamdu, G., Fuadi, F. N., Yulianto, A., & Akhirani, Y. S. (2020). Items quality analysis using Rasch model to measure elementary school students’ critical thinking skill on stem learning. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i1.20884
Hasanah, A. L., Subali, B., & Mariyam, S. (2016). Analisis item ujian akhir semester (UAS) genap mata pleajaran biologi kelas X tahun ajaran 2014/2015 di SMA yang mengimplementasikan kurikulum 2013 di kabupaten sleman. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 5(4), 7–26. https://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jeb/article/view/4530
Herrmann-Abell, C. F., & DeBoer, G. E. (2011). Using distractor-driven standards-based multiple-choice assessments and Rasch modeling to investigate hierarchies of chemistry misconceptions and detect structural problems with individual items. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 12(2), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1RP90023D
Ibnu, M., Indriyani, B., Inayatullah, H., & Guntara, Y. (2019). Aplikasi Rasch Model: Pengembangan instrumen tes untuk mengukur miskonsepsi mahasiswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan FKIP, 2(1), 205–210. https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/psnp/article/view/5669
Irmalasari, K., Suratsih, & Wibowo, Y. (2016). Analisis butir soal ulangan akhir semester genap kelas X Biologi tahun ajaran 2015/2016. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 5(8), 10–18. https://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jeb/article/view/6043
Kunandar. (2014). Penilaian Autentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013). Rajawali Pers.
Lubis, N. S., & Prastowo, P. (2017). Analisis kualitas soal ujian mata pelajaran biologi di SMA Negeri 3 Medan tahun pembelajaran 2016/2017. Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, 5(1), 149–157. https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/pelita/article/view/8456
Misbach, I. H., & Sumintono, B. (2014). Pengembangan dan validasi instrumen “Persepsi siswa tehadap karakter moral guru” di Indonesia dengan Model Rasch. Seminar Nasional Psikometri Dengan Tema “Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Karakter Yang Valid,” 1–17.
Mujimin. (2010). Kompetensi guru dalam menyusun butir soal pada mata pelajaran bahasa Jawa di sekolah dasar. LINGUA (Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra), 6(2).
Novinda, M. R. R., Silitonga, H. T. M., & Hamdani. (2019). Pengembangan tes pilihan ganda menggunakan model Rasch materi gerak lurus kelas X Pontianak. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 8(6), 1–11. https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/view/33452
Oktanin, W. S., & Sukirno. (2015). Analisis butir soal ujian akhir mata pelajaran ekonomi akuntansi. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 8(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v13i1.5183
Rahmadhani, E. K. (2014). Analisis kualitas butir soal pada bank soal biologi kelas X SMA. Bioedu (Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi), 3(1), 422–438. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/bioedu/article/view/7055/7650
Rahmani, M., Ningsih, K., & Nurdini, A. (2015). Analisis kualitas butir soal buatan guru Biologi kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Tanah Pinoh. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 4(2). https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/view/8970/8901
Sabekti, A. W., & Khoirunnisa, F. (2018). Penggunaan Rasch Model untuk mengembangkan instrumen pengukuran kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada topik ikatan kimia. Jurnal Zarah, 6(2), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.31629/zarah.v6i2.724
Sari, A. I. C., & Herawati, M. (2014). Aplikasi Anates versi 4 dalam menganalisis butir soal. Faktor Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 1(2), 203–214. https://journal.lppmunindra.ac.id/index.php/Faktor/article/view/353
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sukiman. (2012). Pengembangan Sistem Evaluasi. Insan Madani.
Sukmadinata, N. S. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2013). Aplikasi model rasch untuk penelitian ilmu-ilmu sosial. Trim Komunikata Publishing House.
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi pemodelan rasch pada assessment pendidikan. Trim Komunikata Publishing House.
Susanto, H., Rinaldi, A., & Novalia. (2015). Analisis validitas reliabilitas tingkat kesukaran dan daya beda pada butir soal ujian akhir semester ganjil mata pelajaran matematika. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v6i2.50
Susdelina, Perdana, S. A., & Febrian. (2018). Analisis kualitas instrumen pengukuran pemahaman konsep persamaan kuadrat melalui teori tes klasik dan Rasch Model. Jurnal Kiprah, 6(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.31629/kiprah.v6i1.574
Stolt, M., Kottorp, A., & Suhonen, R. (2022). The use and quality of reporting of Rasch analysis in nursing research: A methodological scoping review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 132, 104244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104244
Syadiah, A. N., & Hamdu, G. (2020). Analisis rasch untuk soal tes berpikir kritis pada pembelajaran STEM di sekolah dasar. Premiere Educandum : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 10(2), 138. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v10i2.6524
Tenant, A., McKenna, S. P., & Hagell, P. (2004). Application of Rasch analysis in the development and application of quality of life instruments. Value Health, 7. S22-S26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.7s106.x
Wahyudi, A., Setyowati, A., & Partini, S. (2020). Analisis model Rasch pada pengembangan skala resiliensi. Jurnal Fokus Konseling, 6(2), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.52657/jfk.v6i2.1157
Widyaningsih, S. W., & Yusuf, I. (2018). Analisis soal modul laboratorium fisika sekolah I menggunakan Racsh model. Gravity:Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 4(1), 33–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/gravity.v4i1.3116

Downloads

Published

2022-10-31

How to Cite

Isnaeni, B., Aprilia, N., & Saifuddin, M. F. (2022). Rasch model: Quality of final semester assessment items for class x on biology subject. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 15(2), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.23326