AI-Based socioscientific learning media for collaborative skills in biology education

Aakhidzatis Safiera; Slamet Hariyadi

doi:10.21009/biosferjpb.60965

Authors

Aakhidzatis Safiera Biology Education, Faculty of Teaching and Training Education, Universitas Jember, Indo-nesia
Slamet Hariyadi Biology Education, Faculty of Teaching and Training Education, Universitas Jember, Indo-nesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.60965

Keywords:

Contextual learning, Digital media, Instructional design, Secondary education

Abstract

Limited availability of engaging and contextual learning media often limits students’ active participation and the development of collaborative skills in biology learning, particularly in environmental topics. This study aims to determine the validity, practicality, and effectiveness of developing Kling-AI application-based learning media through the Socioscientific Issue (SSI) approach in supporting students’ collaborative skills. This study employed a Research and Development (R&D) method using the ADDIE development model, which consists of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation stages. The research subjects included media experts, subject matter experts, teachers, and students. Data were collected through expert validation, practicality questionnaires, and pre-test and post-test assessments. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive quantitative analysis. The results showed that the developed learning media achieved a high level of validity, with media expert validation reaching 86.50% and subject matter expert validation reaching 97.72%. The practicality of the media was categorized as very practical based on student responses (92.00%) and practical based on teacher responses (80.00%). The effectiveness of the media was indicated by an N-gain value of 0.33 in the moderate category and a collaborative skills mastery percentage of 86.36%, classified as highly effective. These findings indicate that the Kling-AI application-based learning media integrated with the SSI approach is valid, practical, and effective in supporting students’ collaborative skills.

References

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional_Design_The_ADDIE_Approach. Springer.

Budi, S. I., Waluyo, J., & Hariyadi, S. (2020). Effectiveness Of Science Textbooks Based On Socio-Scientific Issues In Biotechnology Materials To Improve Creative Thinking Ability. International Journal of Aadvanced Research, 8(4), 140–144. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/10757

Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510

Fadilah, M., Ananda, S., Aulia Asri, N., Fitri, R., Alberida, H., Kartina, D., Laily Alindra, A., & Ilhami, A. (2022). Development of Socioscientific Case-Based Worksheet in Biology Topics for IX Grade Jun-ior High School to Improve Communication-Collaboration Performance. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 10(3), 654–668. https://doi.org/10.24815/JPSI.V10I3.25162

Fischer, D., King, J., Rieckmann, M., Barth, M., Büssing, A., Hemmer, I., & Lindau-Bank, D. (2022). Teacher Education for Sustainable Development: A Review of an Emerging Research Field. In Journal of Teacher Education (Vol. 73, Issue 5, pp. 509–524). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871221105784

Gough, A. (2017). Educating for the marine environment: Challenges for schools and scientists. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 124(2), 633–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.06.069

Greenstein, L. M. (2012). Assessing 21st Century Skills: A Guide to Evaluating Mastery and Authentic Learning. Corwin A Sage Company.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Hariyadi, S. (2014). ABSTRAK BERTANYA, PEMICU KREATIVITAS DALAM INTERAKSI BELAJAR. In Jurnal Biology Science & Education.

Hariyadi, S., Duran Corebima, A., Zubaidah, S., & 3, I. (2018). Contribution of Mind Mapping, Summariz-ing, and Questioning in the RQA Learning Model to Genetic Learning Outcomes. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10222a

Hariyadi, S., Subaharianto, A., Siswati, B. H., & Shah, D. S. M. (2025). Building Resilient Elementary Schools in the Digital Era: Integrating Deep Learning Pedagogy and Artificial Intelligence. Bubungan Tinggi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 7(4), 973. https://doi.org/10.20527/btjpm.v7i4.16512

Hwang, G. J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of Arti-ficial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAEAI.2020.100001

Karişan, D., & Zeidler, D. (2024). Teaching socioscientific issues in the digital age: Emerging trends and unexplored frontiers. Turkish Journal of Education, 13(1), 92–109. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.1384524

Mang, H. M. A., Chu, H. E., Martin, S. N., & Kim, C. J. (2021). An SSI-Based STEAM Approach to Developing Science Programs. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 7(2), 549–585. https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10036

Maulid, T. A., Maulana, & Isrok’atun. (2024). Keterampilan Guru dalam Membuat Media Pembelajaran Di-gital dengan Menggunakan Artificial Intelligence Aplikasi Canva. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 13(1), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.58230/27454312.485

Molenda, M. (2015). In Search of the Elusive ADDIE Model. Performance Improvement, 54(2), 40–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21461

Olsson, D., Gericke, N., & Boeve-de Pauw, J. (2022). The effectiveness of education for sustainable devel-opment revisited–a longitudinal study on secondary students’ action competence for sustainabil-ity. Environmental Education Research, 28(3), 405–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2033170

Pierce, G. L., & Cleary, P. F. (2024). The persistent educational digital divide and its impact on societal in-equality. PLoS ONE, 19(4 April). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286795

Pitiporntapin, S., Thanapad, A., Seomsuk, N., & Lankford, D. M. (2015). Enhancing pre-service science teachers’ practices according to Socio-scientific Issue (SSI)-based teaching through collaborative action research. Asian Social Science, 11(28), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n28p77

Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2014). Design and Development Research. In Handbook of Research on Edu-cational Communications and Technology: Fourth Edition. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_12

Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for prac-tice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681839

Salehudin, M., Nasir, M., Hamzah, S. H., Toba, R., Hayati, N., & Safiah, I. (2021). The users’ experiences in processing visual media for creative and online learning using Instagram. European Journal of Ed-ucational Research, 10(4), 1669–1682. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.4.1669

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2020). All the same or different? Revisiting measures of teachers’ technology acceptance. Computers and Education, 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103656

Semken, S., & Freeman, C. B. (2008). Sense of place in the practice and assessment of place-based science teaching. Science Education, 92(6), 1042–1057. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20279

Sholehah, A., Pertiwi, A. D., & Yudianti, F. (2022). Studi Literatur Penggunaan Pendekatan Socio Scientific Issue Untuk Membentuk Generasi Indonesia Yang Kritis. ScienceEdu, 5(2), 46. https://scispace.com/pdf/studi-literatur-penggunaan-pendekatan-socio-scientific-issue-2vukvsxu.pdf

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (Sutopo, Ed.; 1st ed., Vol. 1). Alfabeta.

Sultana, N., Zamir, S., & Muhammad, S. (2021). The Instructional Design Knowledge Base. http://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2021(2-III)4

van de Werfhorst, H. G., Kessenich, E., & Geven, S. (2022). The digital divide in online education: Inequali-ty in digital readiness of students and schools. Computers and Education Open, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100100

van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2019). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media and Society, 21(2), 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082

Wijayanti, R., Waitaby, M., & Utomo, I. B. (2024). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Animasi Untuk Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Pola Bilangan. Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika Realistik (JI-MR), 5(1), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.33365/ji-mr.v5i1.5187

Yokhebed. (2019). Profil Kompetensi Abad 21: Komunikasi, Kreatif, Kolaborasi, Berpikir Kritis Pada Ca-lon Guru Biologi. Biology Education Conference: Biology, Science, Enviromental, and Learning, 16(1), 118. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/38406

Zeidler, D. L. (2025). Socioscientific issues as a moral context for hazard literacy and disaster education. Journal of Hazard Literacy, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.63737/jhl.25.0022

Zeidler, D. L., Osborne, J., Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Monk, M. (2003). The Role of Argument During Dis-course About Socioscientific Issues. The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and Dis-course in Science Education, 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4996-X_6

Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based frame-work for socioscientific issues education. In Science Education (Vol. 89, Issue 3, pp. 357–377). https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048

Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2021). AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions. In Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 2). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100025