Pre-service biology teachers’ motivational responses to the sustainable digital vegetation mapping program design: A pre-implementation study

Authors

  • Safira Permata Dewi Science Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Riandi Science Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Siti Sriyati Biology Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Ikmanda Nugraha Science Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.69477

Keywords:

ARCS model, Botany education, Instructional Materials Motivation , Plant awareness disparity, Sustainable Digital Vegetation

Abstract

Plant awareness disparity (PAD) poses a challenge to botany education. However, students’ evaluations of instructional designs before implementation remain underexplored. This study aimed to describe pre-service biology teachers’ motivational responses to the Sustainable Digital Vegetation Mapping Program (SDVMP) and integrate these responses with their qualitative perceptions. A convergent mixed-methods design was employed involving 122 Biology Education students at Universitas Sriwijaya who had completed a Vascular Plant Botany course. Before completing the instruments, participants reviewed an infographic presenting the proposed SDVMP design. Quantitative data were collected using an adapted 34-item Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) based on the four ARCS dimensions. Qualitative data were obtained through one open-ended question, and 109 responses were analysed thematically. The overall IMMS mean was 3.28 (SD = 0.36; α = 0.96). Satisfaction (M = 3.34) and Relevance (M = 3.34) had nearly identical mean scores, followed by Attention (M = 3.26) and Confidence (M = 3.19). Eight themes emerged, with Appeal and Innovation (77.06%), Relevance and Usefulness (42.20%), and Program Clarity and Organization (33.94%) being the most prominent. Sustainability and Green Campus appeared in 20.18% of responses. Overall, students perceived the SDVMP design positively in motivational terms. However, these responses reflect preliminary evaluations of the infographic rather than evidence of program effectiveness or a reduction in PAD. The findings can inform formative refinement of the program design and provide a basis for evaluating its effectiveness after implementation.

References

Bobo-Pinilla, J., Marcos-Walias, J., Delgado Iglesias, J., & Reinoso Tapia, R. (2024). Overcoming plant blindness: Are the future teachers ready? Journal of Biological Education, 58(5), 1466–1480. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2023.2255197

Borsos, É., Borić, E., & Patocskai, M. (2023). What can be done to increase future teachers’ plant knowledge? Journal of Biological Education, 57(2), 252–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.1909632

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brondízio, E. Sonnewend., Settele, Josef., Díaz, Sandra., & Ngo, H. Thu. (2019). Global assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673

Corbacho-Cuello, I., Hernández-Barco, M. A., & Muñoz-Losa, A. (2025). Science and plant interest in outdoor learning: Evaluating prospective teachers’ experiences with a botanical inquiry trail. Science Education International, 36(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v36.i1.6

Coşkunserçe, O. (2024). Use of a mobile plant identification application and the out-of-school learning method in biodiversity education. Ecology and Evolution, 14(4), e10957. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10957

Cresswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

Doyle, L., Brady, A. M., & Byrne, G. (2009). An overview of mixed methods research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 14(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987108093962

Ermayanti, Susanti, R., Santoso, L. M., Santri, D. J., & Qolbi, A. T. (2024). Plant species in the environment of FKIP Unsri as a learning resource in plant morphology and anatomy practicum. Jurnal Pembelajaran Biologi: Kajian Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 11(2), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.36706/jpb.v11i2.100

Fitriani, R., Hernawati, D., & Putra, R. R. (2025). Digital plant project in biology education: Bridging sociodemographic gaps in plant awareness. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 18(2), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.60879

Jegstad, K. M., Gjøtterud, S. M., & Sinnes, A. T. (2018). Science teacher education for sustainable development: A case study of a residential field course in a Norwegian pre-service teacher education programme. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 18(2), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2017.1374192

Jeno, L. M., Vandvik, V., Eliassen, S., & Grytnes, J. A. (2019). Testing the novelty effect of an m-learning tool on internalization and achievement: A self-determination theory approach. Computers and Education, 128, 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.008

Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational Design for Learning and Performance. Springer.

Kesler, M., Kaasinen, A., & Kervinen, A. (2024). Teaching science outdoors: Supporting pre-service teachers’ skill development with the help of available mobile applications. Education Sciences, 14(11), 1218. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111218

Krosnick, J. A. (1991). Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050305

Loorbach, N., Peters, O., Karreman, J., & Steehouder, M. (2015). Validation of the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) in a self-directed instructional setting aimed at working with technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12138

Nederhof, A. J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420150303

Parsley, K. M. (2020). Plant awareness disparity: A case for renaming plant blindness. Plants People Planet, 2(6), 598–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10153

Putra, R. R., & Biologi Sel, D. (2025). Correlation between plant awareness disparity and plant identification ability in preservice teacher. Jurnal Biology Science & Education, 14(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.33477/bs.v14i1.9263

Soraya, P. H. R., Solihat, R., Riandi, R., & Harada, T. (2026). Plant awareness and recognition of plants as living beings among biology preservice teachers in Bandung, Indonesia. Edusains, 18(1), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v18i1.50227

Stagg, B. C., Hetherington, L., & Dillon, J. (2025). Towards a model of plant awareness in education: A literature review and framework proposal. International Journal of Science Education, 47(4), 539–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2342575

Telli, S. (2025). Exploring the preservice teachers’ work to label the plants in the faculty garden. Athens Journal of Education, 12(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.12-1-4

Uno, G. E. (2009). Botanical literacy: What and how should students learn about plants? American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1753–1759. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900025

Williams, A. T., & Cederqvist, A. M. (2025). Affordances of the mAR app Seek: Enhancing species identification skills and plant awareness in student teachers’ fieldwork activities. Journal of Biological Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2025.2574578

Downloads

Published

2026-10-21

How to Cite

Dewi, S. P., Riandi, Sriyati, S., & Nugraha, I. (2026). Pre-service biology teachers’ motivational responses to the sustainable digital vegetation mapping program design: A pre-implementation study. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 19(2), 855–867. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.69477