Diskursus Pemberitaan Media Online mengenai Penerimaan Izin Usaha Pertambangan oleh Muhammadiyah dan Nahdlatul Ulama

Penulis

  • Said Romadlan Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA, Jakarta Selatan, DKI Jakarta, 12130, Indonesia.
  • Mukhlish Muhammad Maududi Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA, Jakarta Selatan, DKI Jakarta, 12130, Indonesia.
  • Dini Wahdiyati Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA, Jakarta Selatan, DKI Jakarta, 12130, Indonesia.
  • Gilang Kumari Putra Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA, Jakarta Selatan, DKI Jakarta, 12130, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/communications.7.2.3

Abstrak

As an Islamic community organization, Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) have received an offer for a mining business license from the Government. This acceptance raises pros and cons from various circles.The controversy over the receipt of mining business licenses by Muhammadiyah and NU then became a discourse in the online media, where there was a discourse of pros and cons over the receipt of the mining permit. This study aims to show the discourse of online media news regarding the receipt of mining business licenses by Muhammadiyah and NU. For this reason, the method used is the discourse analysis of the Halliday-Hasan model which focuses its analysis on three elements, namely (1) tenor of discourse, (2) field of discourse, and (3) mode of discourse. The results of the study show that there are two areas of discourse that appear in the online media, namely approving (pro) and rejecting (con) the receipt of mining business licenses by Muhammadiyah and NU. For the tenor of discourse in the field of discourse who agree are dominated by sources from Muhammadiyah leaders, NU leaders, and members of the House of Representatives. Meanwhile, the tenor of the discourse who refused came from Muhammadiyah internal circles, non-governmental organization activists, academics/experts, and members of the House of Representatives. The mode of discourse used by online media are descriptive, argumentative, and persuasive writing styles. The results of this study strengthen the influence of media routines on the practice of media discourse.

Referensi

Amerian, M., & Esmaili, F. (2014). Language and gender: A critical discourse analysis on gender representation in a series of international ELT textbooks. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 4(2), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2014.963

Apriyanto, D., & Maruf, S. N. A. (2024). Implementasi kesejahteraan masyarakat dalam prioritas WIUPK untuk badan usaha keagamaan berdasarkan PP No. 25 tahun 2024. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik, 6(3), 367–380.

Astinda, A. N. R., Pratama, W. P., & Haidar, M. B. (2024). Konflik regulasi dan masalah kelayakan pada kebijakan izin usaha pertambangan bagi ormas keagamaan. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(3), 1851–1864. https://iprosiding.usm.ac.id/index.php/julr/article/view/10900/4707

Azmah, S. F. N., Ansoriyah, S., & Mayumi, I. (2023). Analisis wacana kritis fairclough dalam wacana pilpres 2024 (studi kasus berita di instagram @Pinterpolitik). J-P3K: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, Psikologi, Dan Kesehatan, 4(2), 45–53. http://jurnalp3k.com/index.php/J-P3K/article/view/200

Barton, G. (2014). The gülen movement, Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama: Progressive islamic thought, religious philanthropy and civil society in Turkey and Indonesia. Islam and Christian–Muslim relations, 25(3), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2014.916124

Berger, A. A. (2011). Media and communication research methods an Iitroduction to qualitative and quantitative approach (2nd ed.). Singapore: Sage.

Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods Bryman. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Eriyanto. (2019). Metode Penelitian Komunikasi (3rd ed.). Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. New York: St. Martin’s Press Inc.

Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis the critical study of language. Edinburgh: Logman Applied Linguistics.

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 7(2), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2013.798239

Fariduddin, A. M., & Kusuma, O. A. (2024). Menyibak ilusi ideologi dalam pemberian izin pertambangan bagi organisasi masyarakat keagamaan sebagai upaya pembangunan nasional. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum UMS, 93–106. https://proceedings.ums.ac.id/pdih/article/view/4692/4273

Halliday, M. A. ., & Hasan, R. (1992). Bahasa, konteks, dan teks: Aspek-aspek bahasa dalam pandangan semiotika sosial. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Hefner, R. W. (2001). Civil islam: Islam dan demokrasi di Indonesia (A. Baso, Trans). Institute Studi Arus Informasi & The Asia Foundation.

Kudri, P., & Ciptadi, S. G. (2023). Analisis diskursus berita komunisme harian Kompas sebelum dan sesudah peristiwa gerakan 30 September 1965. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi UHO : Jurnal Penelitian Kajian Ilmu Komunikasi Dan Informasi, 8(1), 96–113. https://doi.org/10.52423/jikuho.v8i1.5

Listiorini, D., Asteria, D., & Hidayana, I. (2019). Diskursus ujaran kebencian pemerintah pada kasus LGBT di media daring. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 16(2), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.24002/jik.v16i2.2430

Lubis, A. A. (2014). Teori dan metodologi ilmu pengetahuan sosial budaya kontemporer (1st ed.). Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Nashir, H. (2010). Memahami manhaj gerakan Muhammadiyah. In Manhaj Gerakan Muhammadiyah Ideologi, Khittah, dan Langkah. Suara Muhammadiyah & Majelis Kader PP Muhammadiyah.

Nashir, H. (2014). Memahami ideologi Muhammadiyah. Suara Muhammadiyah dan Majelis Kader PP Muhammadiyah.

Prastika, A., Putri, M.F.I., & Tasya, V.N. (2024). Urgensi pemberian izin pengelolaan tambang bagi organisasi kemasyarakatan “keagamaan” di Indonesia: Analisis regulasi dalam PP nomor 25 tahun 2024. TARUNALAW : Journal of Law and Syariah, 2(02), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.54298/tarunalaw.v2i02.216

Putera, I. R. (2024). Dinamika pemberian izin pertambangan kepada organisasi kemasyarakatan “Keagamaan" dalam sudut pandang potensi pelanggaran HAM. KULTURA Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 2(8), 239–247.

Ricoeur, P. (2006). Hermeneutika ilmu sosial (M. Syukri, Trans). Kreasi Wacana.

Ricoeur, P., & Thompson, J. B. (2016). Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action and interpretation. In Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316534984

Rohma, M. N. (2024). Navigating digital activism on environmental movement: Mining license grants to religious organizations in Indonesia. Insignia Journal of International Relations, 11(2), 184–205. https://jurnalonline.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/insignia/article/view/13533/6180

Romadlan, S. (2019). Diskursus makna toleransi terhadap non-muslim dalam Muhammadiyah sebagai gerakan Islam berkemajuan (analisis hermeneutika Paul Ricoeur). Komuniti, 11(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.23917/komuniti.v12i2.9633

Romadlan, S. (2020). Diskursus negara Pancasila di kalangan Muhammadiyah. Jurnall Sosial Politik, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.22219/sospol.v6i1.10041

Romadlan, S. (2022). Nahdlatul Ulama dan praktik deradikalisasi di media online. Jurnal Komunikasi Islam, 12(2), 220–244. https://doi.org/10.15642/jki.2022.12.2.220-244

Romadlan, S., Wibisono, D. P., & Triwahyuningsih, Z. (2021). Kontradiskursus makna jihad sebagai teror di media online suaramuhammadiyah.id dan NU Online. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi Dan Media, 25(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.31445/jskm.2021.4355

Rumadi, Fuaidi, H. A. N., & Ma’afi, H. M. (2016). Hasil-hasil Muktamar ke-33 Nahdlatul Ulama (Rumadi, H. A. N. Fuaidi, & H. M. Ma’afi (eds.); II). Jakarta: Lembaga Ta’lif wan Nasyr PBNU.

Shoemaker, P. J., Eichholz, M., Kim, E., & Wrigley, B. (2001). Individual and routine forces in gatekeeping. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(2), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900107800202

Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the message theories of influences on mass media content (2nd ed.). New York, Longman Publisher.

Sholahudin, T., & Maksum, M. N. R. (2024). Analisis dampak sosial dan ekonomi dari pemberian konsesi tambang kepada organisasi masyarakat Nahdlatul Ulama. Arus Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora (AJSH), 4(2), 672–682.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57250/ajsh.v4i2.516

Sutley, S., & Hefner, R. W. (2001). Civil Islam: Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia. Pacific Affairs, 74(3), 459. https://doi.org/10.2307/3557788

van Bruinessen, M. (2003). Post-Soeharto Muslim engagements with civil society and democratization. in H. Samuel & H. Schulte Nordholt (Eds.), Indonesia in transition: Rethinking 'civil society', 'region' and 'crisis', (pp. 37-66). Pustaka Pelajar.

https://www.academia.edu/2636143/Post_Suharto_Muslim_engagements_with_civil_society_and_democratization

Wafi, M. H., Ikhwan, S., & Handoko, T. (2022). Islam Nusantara dan diskursus politik: Analisis wacana kritis berita di CNN Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Islam, 12(1), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.15642/jki.2022.12.1.83-105

Diterbitkan

2025-07-31

Cara Mengutip

Romadlan, S., Maududi, M. M., Wahdiyati, D., & Putra, G. K. (2025). Diskursus Pemberitaan Media Online mengenai Penerimaan Izin Usaha Pertambangan oleh Muhammadiyah dan Nahdlatul Ulama . Communications, 7(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.21009/communications.7.2.3

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles