Relational Closeness through Long-term Interaction among Local Actors in Batik Lasem Cultural Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/communications.8.2.2Keywords:
Relational Closeness, Long-Term Interaction, Interpersonal Communication, Relational Dialectics Theory, Batik LasemAbstract
Communication in community-based cultural work settings remains insufficiently understood, particularly in explaining how long-term interaction develops into relational closeness while formal work roles remain intact. This study examines the communicative processes underlying relational closeness among local actors involved in Batik Lasem cultural practices. Using a qualitative interpretive approach, data were collected through a focus group discussion with eight batik workers and in-depth interviews with two Batik Lasem business owners. The data were analyzed inductively through thematic analysis and interpreted using Relational Dialectics Theory. The findings show that relational closeness develops through sustained interaction, shared experiences, flexible work practices, and everyday communication that gradually cultivate familiarity, trust, mutual belonging, and family-like relationships. However, relational closeness does not eliminate organizational boundaries, as owners and workers continue to recognize their respective roles and responsibilities. Instead, connectedness and autonomy coexist through culturally embedded communication practices emphasizing harmony, respect, and relational continuity. This study contributes to interpersonal communication scholarship by conceptualizing relational closeness as a dynamic communicative accomplishment rather than an automatic outcome of prolonged interaction. It also extends the application of Relational Dialectics Theory to community-based cultural work settings where interpersonal closeness and structured work relationships are continuously negotiated.
References
Anggraini, N., & Sugiyanto, D. R. (2021). Pemaknaan Bahasa Dalam Percakapan Pemain Online Game: Studi etnografi virtual dalam permainan free fire. Jurnal Communications, 3(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.21009/Communications.4.1.1
Assegaff, S. B., Fajarini, E. S., Herari, N., & Setiawati, A. (2024). Message reception analysis in intercultural communication during "Magnetic resonance imaging" Training in hospitals. Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia, 9(1), 211-225. https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski.v9i1.1010
Basiroen, V. J., & Manuaba, I. B. K. (2022). The cultural aspect of Javanese and Chinese acculturation in Lasem. Humaniora, 13(2), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v13i2.7527
Baxter, K. A., Scharp, K. M., & Thomas, L. J. (2021). Relational dialectics theory. Engaging Theories in Interpersonal Communication, 194-205. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003195511-17
Berta, O. G. (2025). Culture or commerce? Craft as an ambiguous construction between culture and economy. Journal of Cultural Economy, 18(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2023.2229335
Chory, R. M., & Horan, S. M. (2023). Personal workplace relationships: Unifying an understudied area of organizational and personal life. Behavioral Sciences, 13(9), Article 760. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13090760
Fathimah, Z. (2022). Hubungan interpersonal pada keluarga campuran muhammadiyah Dan nahdlatul ulama Di Desa banjaranyar lamongan. Communications, 4(2), 262-279. https://doi.org/10.21009/communications.4.2.9
Feeney, J. A., & Fitzgerald, J. (2022). Autonomy–connection tensions, stress, and attachment: The case of COVID-19. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.05.004
Fuchs, C., & Reichel, A. (2023). Effective communication for relational coordination in remote work: How job characteristics andHRpractices shape user–technology interactions. Human Resource Management, 62(4), 511-528. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22161
Hall, J. A., Dominguez, J., & Mihailova, T. (2022). Interpersonal media and face-to-face communication: Relationship with life satisfaction and loneliness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 24(1), 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00581-8
Kriyantono, R. (2020). Teknik praktis riset komunikasi kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Prenadamedia Group.
Kofler, I., & Walder, M. (2024). Crafts and their social imaginary: How technological development shapes the future of the crafts sector. Social Sciences, 13(3), 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13030137
Laili, N. N., & Masruroh, N. N. (2017). Kebangkitan industri Batik Lasem di awal abad XXI. Patrawidya, 18(1), 1–12. https://patrawidya.kemenbud.go.id/index.php/patrawidya/article/view/43
Liu, X., Xu, Z., & Wang, H. (2025). Examining the association between cultural intelligence and linguistic confidence: The mediating roles of cross-cultural adaptation and interpersonal communication competence in international students in China. Sage Open, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251336507
Marlina, E., Purwaningsih, M., Maulana Siagian, A. A., Al Hakim, S., & Maryati, I. (2024). Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research: The Role of Triangulation Techniques. In R. Throne (Ed.), Qualitative research methods for dissertation research (pp. 347-376). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3069-2.ch012
Mikkola, L., Peltola, M., & Apker, J. (2025). Dialectical tensions in interprofessional relationships: Understanding relational dialectics theory in health and social care teams. In S. Fox, K. McAllum, & L. Mikkola (Eds.), Interprofessional communication in health and social care: Theoretical perspectives on practical realities (pp. 115–132). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70106-1_7
Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789
Rodrigue, C. (2023). Relationship course theory: An interdisciplinary integrative proposition to address the complexification of interpersonal relationships. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 53(4), 620-641. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12391
Rondi, E., Magrelli, V., Debellis, F., & De Massis, A. (2024). The evolution of craft work in the strategic development of a family enterprise. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 18(4), 811-840. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1503
Szczuka, J. M., Mühl, L., & Schneeberger, T. (2026). Intimacy by design: Definition, state of research, and interdisciplinary research agenda on intimate Human-AI interactions. AI & SOCIETY. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-026-03112-8
Thomas, L. J., & Scharp, K. M. (2026). A meaningful theory: 25 years of relational dialectics theory in the Journal of Family Communication. Journal of Family Communication, 26(2), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2026.2638563
Viganò, F., England, L., & Comunian, R. (2023). Connecting craft, design and the wood industry in South Tyrol: From clusters to creative ecosystem. Journal of Rural Studies, 104, 103149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103149
Yue, C. A., Qu, Y., Kim, H. K., & Zhou, A. (2026). Workplace ties that matter: The impact of advice and friendship networks on employee identification, well-being, and turnover intention. Management Communication Quarterly, 40(2), 341–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189251388106
West, A. L., Naeimi, H., Di Bartolomeo, A. A., Yampolsky, M., & Muise, A. (2022). Growing together through our cultural differences: Self-expansion in intercultural romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 50(2), 182-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221121508
Wibowo, G., Suhud, U., Utami, A. R., Rubiyasih, A., Sukmi, S. N., Allan, M., Hoo, W. C., & Sihotang, D. S. (2026). A participatory model for sustainable branding of heritage SMEs: Digital communication and AI empowerment in batik Lasem. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 13(3), 2271-2287. https://doi.org/10.51244/ijrsi.2026.1303000196
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Samantha Claudya, Candida Jau Emang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Author retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a creative commons attribution licensethat allow others to share the work within an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication of this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangementfor the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g. acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal).
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online(e.g. in institutional repositories or on their websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published works.
Users/public use of this website will be licensed to CC BY
