PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN POED (PREDICT-OBSERVE-EXPLAIN-DO) TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS PESERTA DIDIK DALAM PEMBELAJARAN HUKUM DASAR KIMIA KELAS X SMAN 11 JAKARTA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/JRPK.152.09Kata Kunci:
POED (Predict-Observe-Explain-Doing), Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis, Hukum Dasar KimiaAbstrak
Penelitian ini dilakukan bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh model pembelajaran POED (Predict-Observe-Explain-Do) terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik di SMAN 11 Jakarta pada materi hukum dasar kimia. Metode penelitian kuantitatif dalam penelitian ini adalah quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian posttest only control group design. Pengambilan sampel menggunakan purposive sampling pada kelas X SMAN 11 Jakarta. Pengumpulan data menggunakan instrumen tes bentuk uraian. Pengujian data dianalisis menggunakan analisis statistik deskriptif dan statistik inferensial (uji-t). Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diperoleh data dari nilai posttest kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik kelas eksperimen yaitu sebesar 84,80 sedangkan nilai rata – rata kelas kontrol yaitu sebesar 77,89. Sementara itu, data independent sample t-test memperoleh sig. (2-tailed) sebesar 0,001 < 0,05 dengan effect size hasil data penelitian sebesar 1,454 > 1 pada kategori memperoleh pengaruh sangat besar. Berdasarkan analisis data penelitian terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol. Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis dengan model pembelajaran POED (Predict-Observe-Explain-Doing) dipengaruhi dari proses pembelajaran secara sistematis dan mendalam, sehingga lebih mengasah kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik. Dapat disimpulkan dalam penelitian terdapat pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran POED (Predict-Observe-Explain-Doing) terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik kelas X di SMAN 11 Jakarta pada materi hukum dasar kimia.
Referensi
Almulla, M. A. (2023). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for students’ critical thinking, creativity, and problem solving to affect academic performance in higher education. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172929
Baker, M. J. (2015). Collaboration in collaborative learning. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 16(3), 451–473.
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661.
Chang, R. (2005). Kimia Dasar Konsep-Konsep Inti Edisi Ketiga Jilid 1. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Chen, J. C. (2022). Developing a cycle-mode POED model and using scientific inquiry for a practice activity to improve students’ learning motivation, learning performance, and hands-on ability. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(7), 1252–1264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1716023
Edriati, S. (2018). Enhancing students’ critical thinking skills through critical thinking assessment in calculus course. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 948, 12031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012031
Ennis, R. H. (1992). The degree to which critical thinking is subject specific: Clarification and needed research. The generalizability of critical thinking: Multiple perspectives on an educational ideal, 21-37.
Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum: A Vision. Topoi, 37(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11245-016-9401-4
Joyce, B., Weil, M. (1980). Models of Teaching (Second). Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Kemendikbud. (2003). Undang-Undang Nomor 20tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Http://simkeu.kemdikbud.go.id/
Kementerian Pendidikan. (2020). Analisis Data Mutu Pendidikan Jenjang SMA Provinsi DKI Jakarta.
Krathwohl, D., Anderson, D. (2010). Merlin C. Wittrock and the revision of Bloom’s taxonomy. Taylor & FrancisDR Krathwohl, LW AndersonEducational Psychologist, 2010•Taylor & Francis, 45(1), 64–65.
Le, H., Janssen, J., Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122.
Mardani, M. A. (2020). Pengembangan Permainan Chemistry Backgammon (Chemmon) sebagai Media Pembelajaran Kimia pada Materi Hukum-Hukum Dasar Kimia Kelas X SMA/MA.
Micheli, P., Wilner, S. J. S., Bhatti, S. H., Mura, M., & Beverland, M. B. (2019). Doing Design Thinking: Conceptual Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(2), 124–148.
Nesibe Köklükaya, A., Yıldırım, G. E. (2018). Science Teacher Candidates’ Expression Levels on the Expansion of Water Subject by Prediction-Observation-Explanation Method. Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Education, 2(1), 16–27.
OECD, PISA. (2022). Results: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science (Revised ed., Vol. I), OECD Publishing.
Sarıoğlan, A. B., Özkaya, Ö. Ş. (2021). Predict - Observe - Explain - Do: Calculate Your Carbon Footprint Activity in Distance Education. Journal of Inquiry Based Activities, 11(1), 30–50.
Talanquer, V. (2018). Chemical rationales: another triplet for chemical thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15), 1874–1890. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1513671
Thonney, T., Montgomery, J. C. (2019). Defining Critical Thinking Across Disciplines: An Analysis of Community College Faculty Perspectives. College Teaching, 67(3), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2019.1579700
Vilbig. (2024). Kant, Richter and the a priori representations of Anfangsgründe der Stöchiometrie. Journal for General Philosophy Of.
Zubaidah, S., Corebima, A. D., Mahanal, S., & Mistianah. (2018). Revealing the Relationship between Reading Interest and Critical Thinking Skills through Remap GI and Remap Jigsaw. International Journal of Instruction, 1
