Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran POED (Predict-Observe-Explain-Do) Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Dalam Pembelajaran Hukum Dasar Kimia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/JRPK.152.09Keywords:
POED (Predict-Observe-Explain-Doing) Learning Model, Critical Thinking Ability, Basic Law of ChemistryAbstract
This study was conducted to analyze the effect of POED (Predict-Observe-Explain-Do) learning model on students' critical thinking skills at SMAN 11 Jakarta on the material of basic laws of chemistry. The quantitative research method in this research is quasi experiment with posttest only control group design. Sampling using purposive sampling in class X SMAN 11 Jakarta. Data collection using test instruments in the form of descriptions. Data testing was analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis and inferential statistics (t-test). Based on the results of the study, the data obtained from the posttest value of critical thinking skills of experimental class students is 84,80 while the average value of the control class is 77,89. Meanwhile, the independent sample t-test data obtained sig. (2-tailed) of 0,001 < 0,05 with the effect size of the research data results of 1,454 > 1 in the category of obtaining a very large influence. Based on the analysis of research data, there is a significant difference between the experimental class and the control class. The increase in critical thinking skills with the POED (Predict-Observe-Explain-Doing) learning model is influenced by the learning process systematically and in depth, so that it hones the critical thinking skills of students. It can be concluded in the study that there is an effect of the application of the POED (Predict-Observe-Explain-Doing) learning model on the critical thinking skills of class X students at SMAN 11 Jakarta on the material of the basic laws of chemistry.
References
Almulla, M. A. (2023). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for students’ critical thinking, creativity, and problem solving to affect academic performance in higher education. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172929
Baker, M. J. (2015). Collaboration in collaborative learning. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 16(3), 451–473.
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661.
Chang, R. (2005). Kimia Dasar Konsep-Konsep Inti Edisi Ketiga Jilid 1. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Chen, J. C. (2022). Developing a cycle-mode POED model and using scientific inquiry for a practice activity to improve students’ learning motivation, learning performance, and hands-on ability. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(7), 1252–1264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1716023
Edriati, S. (2018). Enhancing students’ critical thinking skills through critical thinking assessment in calculus course. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 948, 12031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012031
Ennis, R. H. (1992). The degree to which critical thinking is subject specific: Clarification and needed research. The generalizability of critical thinking: Multiple perspectives on an educational ideal, 21-37.
Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum: A Vision. Topoi, 37(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11245-016-9401-4
Joyce, B., Weil, M. (1980). Models of Teaching (Second). Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Kemendikbud. (2003). Undang-Undang Nomor 20tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Http://simkeu.kemdikbud.go.id/
Kementerian Pendidikan. (2020). Analisis Data Mutu Pendidikan Jenjang SMA Provinsi DKI Jakarta.
Krathwohl, D., Anderson, D. (2010). Merlin C. Wittrock and the revision of Bloom’s taxonomy. Taylor & FrancisDR Krathwohl, LW AndersonEducational Psychologist, 2010•Taylor & Francis, 45(1), 64–65.
Le, H., Janssen, J., Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122.
Mardani, M. A. (2020). Pengembangan Permainan Chemistry Backgammon (Chemmon) sebagai Media Pembelajaran Kimia pada Materi Hukum-Hukum Dasar Kimia Kelas X SMA/MA.
Micheli, P., Wilner, S. J. S., Bhatti, S. H., Mura, M., & Beverland, M. B. (2019). Doing Design Thinking: Conceptual Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(2), 124–148.
Nesibe Köklükaya, A., Yıldırım, G. E. (2018). Science Teacher Candidates’ Expression Levels on the Expansion of Water Subject by Prediction-Observation-Explanation Method. Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Education, 2(1), 16–27.
OECD, PISA. (2022). Results: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science (Revised ed., Vol. I), OECD Publishing.
Sarıoğlan, A. B., Özkaya, Ö. Ş. (2021). Predict - Observe - Explain - Do: Calculate Your Carbon Footprint Activity in Distance Education. Journal of Inquiry Based Activities, 11(1), 30–50.
Talanquer, V. (2018). Chemical rationales: another triplet for chemical thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15), 1874–1890. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1513671
Thonney, T., Montgomery, J. C. (2019). Defining Critical Thinking Across Disciplines: An Analysis of Community College Faculty Perspectives. College Teaching, 67(3), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2019.1579700
Vilbig. (2024). Kant, Richter and the a priori representations of Anfangsgründe der Stöchiometrie. Journal for General Philosophy Of.
Zubaidah, S., Corebima, A. D., Mahanal, S., & Mistianah. (2018). Revealing the Relationship between Reading Interest and Critical Thinking Skills through Remap GI and Remap Jigsaw. International Journal of Instruction, 1
