Postgraduate Students' English Learning Motivation in Practicing CEFR Preparation Level B1 Reading

Authors

  • Sukarton Sukarton Stated of Jakarta University
  • Abraham Adiel Yudha Pramudya Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Rizdika Mardiana Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/stairs.6.1.2

Keywords:

B1 Reading Test, CEFR Preparation, Learning Motivation

Abstract

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) is globally adopted as a standard framework for measuring language proficiency across various contexts, including English language education. Despite its increasing application, little is known about how CEFR-based test preparation impacts learner motivation, particularly among postgraduate students. This study aims to explore the motivation of postgraduate students to practice the CEFR preparation level B1 reading test. Using a qualitative narrative inquiry design, data were collected through questionnaires, observation sheets, and self-reflection reports and analyzed thematically to identify key motivational patterns. The results show that 90% of participants reported feeling motivated by the CEFR B1 reading practice, while 10% expressed a neutral stance. Seven prominent motivational terms emerged from the analysis, they are finished, positive, supported, whole, carefully, focused, and practiced.  These findings suggest that structured CEFR preparation activities can enhance learners’ self-perception, focus, and persistence in English learning.

References

Berger, A. (2019). Specifying progression in academic speaking: A keyword analysis of CEFR-based proficiency descriptors. Language Assessment Quarterly, 17, 85 - 99. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2019.1689981.

Council of Europe. Council for Cultural Co-operation. Education Committee. Modern Languages Division. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press. https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages/level-descriptions

Creswell, J. W. and Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods Approaches. Sage, Los Angeles. https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.php/510378/mod_resource/content/1/creswell.pdf

Díez-Bedmar, M. (2018). Fine-tuning descriptors for CEFR B1 level: Insights from learner corpora. ELT Journal, 72, 199-209. https://doi.org/10.1093/ELT/CCX052.

Fithriani, L., Paradisca, M., Sugiarto, I., & Drajati, N. (2020). The students’ perception of using extensive reading material based on CEFR framework. English Community Journal, 4(2), 144-153. https://doi.org/10.32502/ECJ.V4I2.3050.

Goundar, P. (2023). Examining Fijian first-year university students English proficiency on CEFR levels. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v6n2.1050.

Howard, J., Bureau, J., Guay, F., Chong, J., & Ryan, R. (2021). Student motivation and associated outcomes: A meta-analysis from self-determination theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16, 1300 - 1323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966789.

Jamieson, S. (2017). Likert Scale. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved on May 24, 2024, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Likert-Scale.

Matsuzaki, T. (2020). Investigating the difficulties for university learners of English in Japan of CEFR B1-level phrases. CEFR Journal - Research and Practice, 3, 59 - 86. https://doi.org/10.37546/jaltsig.cefr3-4.

McInerney, D. (2019). Motivation. Educational Psychology, 39, 427 - 429. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1600774.

Mo, S. (2022). A case study on a self-directed task in a college English class: Focusing on student reflection. The Korean Society of Culture and Convergence, 44(11), 159 - 171. https://doi.org/10.33645/cnc.2022.11.44.11.159.

Nagai, N., Birch, G., Bower, J., & Schmidt, M. (2020). The CEFR and Practical Resources., 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5894-8_1.

Natova, I. (2019). Estimating CEFR reading comprehension text complexity. The Language Learning Journal, 49, 699 - 710. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1665088.

Novawan, A., Tosalem, S., Binarkaheni, S., & Mariana, E. (2023). Reflecting on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, and Assessment (CEFR) in the Indonesian Context. Journal of English in Academic and Professional Communication, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.25047/jeapco.v9i1.3754.

Palaming, C. (2016). Revitalizing the definition of motivation. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Revitalizing-The-Definition-Of-Motivation-Palaming/4fa2f528eb1f68af002b40f60c9f3040733d5cfa?utm_source=consensus

Schunk, D., & DiBenedetto, M. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832

Selvarajasingam, S., Nair, S., & Wider, W. (2023). Creative approach in teaching CEFR reading comprehension using Bubble Map and Tree Map method. World Journal of English Language, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n8p489.

Syakirah, H., & Santosa, I. (2024). The communicative language strategies of CEFR in TikTok video. STAIRS: English Language Education Journal, 5(1), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.21009/stairs.5.1.3

Downloads

Published

2025-05-30

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.