Ethnobotanical investigation of medicinal plants of serawai tribe in Bengkulu as a potential of biology teaching materials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.22462Keywords:
Biology, Education, Medicinal Plants, Serawai TribeAbstract
The Serawai tribe is one of the indigenous tribes who live in the Bengkulu Province. The Serawai people still use medicinal plants because of the high trust of the Serawai people towards traditional medicine. Local plants have enormous potential to be developed as a source of learning biology. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to obtain information about the species of plants used by the Serawai tribal community in Tanjung Aur Village, Bengkulu as medicinal plants that have the potential as learning resources in biology learning at the high school level. The ethnobotanical studies covered include plant species, plant families, organs used, processing methods, and use value indexes (UV) for each plant. The ethnobotany study in this research used a qualitative descriptive-analytical method. Based on the results of the ethnobotanical study, there are 44 species of medicinal plants and 23 families. The most widely used plant part is the leaf with a percentage of 52.27%. The highest Use Value is Kaempferia galangal L from the Zingebareceae family. Based on the curriculum, the results of the investigation of medicinal plants can be used as teaching materials in biodiversity and plant topics for the grade of 10-th of high school. Teaching materials can form to be learning modules of medicinal plants.
References
Abraham, A. (2016). Gender and creativity: an overview of psychological and neuroscientific literature. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 10(2), 609–618. DOI: 10.1007/s11682-015-9410-8.
Blegur, J., & Tlonaen, Z. A. (2017). Keterampilan berpikir kreatif dan hubungannya dengan hasil belajar peserta didik. Kejaora, 2(1), 60–67. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unibabwi.ac.id/index.php/kejaora/article/view/54
BSNP. (2006). Standar Isi: Standar Kompetensi dan Kompetensi Dasar SMP/MTs. Jakarta: Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.
Budiati, I., Susianto, Y., Adi, W. P., Ayuni, E. S., Reagan, H. A., Larasaty, P., Setiyawati, N., Pratiwi, A. I., & Saputri, V. G. (2018). Statistik Gender Tematik: Profil Generasi Milenial Indonesia. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistika.
Crain, W. (2007). Teori Perkembangan Konsep dan Aplikasi (3rd ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Daryanto, & Karim, S. (2017). Pembelajaran Abad 21. Yogyakarta: Gaya Media.
Demircioglu, T., & Ucar, S. (2015). Investigating the effect of argument-driven inquiry in laboratory instruction. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(1), 267–283. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273901959.
Firdaus, H. M., Widodo, A., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2018). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan proses pengembangan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa SMP pada pembelajaran Biologi. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 1(1), 21–28. doi: 10.17509/aijbe.v1i1.11452
Hasnunidah, N. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: Media Akademi.
Hidayat, W., Wahyudin, & Prabawanto, S. (2018). Improving students’ creative mathematical reasoning ability students through adversity quotient and argument driven inquiry learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1), 1–5. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012005
Juanengsih, N., Apriani, W., & Danial, M. A. (2018). Assessing creativity of senior high school students in learning biology using online portfolio assessment on facebook. Advances in Social Sciences, Education, and Humanities Research, 115(1), 83–88. doi: 10.2991/icems-17.2018.17
Kadayifci, H., Atasoy, B., & Akkus, H. (2012). The correlation between the flaws students define in an argument and their creative and critical thinking abilities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47(3), 802–806. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.738.
Kemdikbud. (2017). Model Silabus Mata Pelajaran Sekolah Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiyah (SMP/MTs): Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kisti, H. H., & Nawangsari, N. A. F. (2012). Hubungan antara self efficacy dengan kreativitas pada siswa smk. Jurnal Psikologi Klinis Dan Kesehatan Mental, 1(2), 52–58. Retrieved from http://journal.unair.ac.id/filerPDF/110710121_1v.pdf
Kumdang, P., Kijkuakul, S., & Chaiyasith, W. C. (2018). An action research on enhancing grade 10 student creative thinking skills using argument-driven inquiry model in the topic of chemical environment. Journal of Science Learning, 2(1), 9. doi: 10.17509/jsl.v2i1.11995
Laius, A., & Rannikmäe, M. (2014). Longitudinal teacher training impact on students ’ attributes of scientific literacy. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(6), 64–72. Accessed from http://www.ijhssnet.com/journal/index/2462
Maryati, S. (2015). Dinamika pengangguran terdidik: tantangan menuju bonus demografi Indonesia. Economica: Journal of Economic and Economic Education, 3(2), 124–136. doi: 10.22202/economica.2015.v3.i2.249.
Mulyasa, E. (2009). Menjadi Guru Profesional Menciptakan Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Menyenangkan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Munandar, U. (2012). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Nugroho, G. A., Prayitno, B. A., & Ariyanto, J. (2017). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kreatif melalui penerapan project based learning pada materi pencemaran dan daur ulang limbah. Jurnal Pembelajaran Biologi, 6(2), 9–12. Accessed from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/18796
P21. (2008). 21st Century Skills, Education & Competitiveness. Jakarta: Partnership for 21st Century Skills.
Piaget, J. (2005). Language and Thought of the Child. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203992739.
Pituch, K. A., & Stevens, J. P. (2016). Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences: Analyses with SAS and IBM‘s SPSS (6th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Probosari, R. M., Ramli, M., Harlita, Indrowati, M., & Sajidan. (2016). Profil keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah mahasiswa pendidikan biologi FKIP UNS pada mata kuliah anatomi tumbuhan. Bioedukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 9(1), 29–33. doi: 10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v9i1.3880.
Purwanto. (2008). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Rachmawati, Y., & Kurniati, E. (2011). Strategi Pengembangan Kreativitas pada Anak TK. Jakarta: Kencana.
Rawlinson, J. G. (2017). Creative Thinking and Brainstorming. UK: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315259000.
Sampson, V., & Gleim, L. (2009). Argument-Driven Inquiry to promote the understanding of important concepts & practices in Biology. The American Biology Teacher, 71(8), 465–472. doi: 10.2307/20565359.
Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2011). Argument-Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study. Science Education, 95(2), 217–257. doi: 10.1002/sce.20421
Şeyihoǧlu, A., & Kartal, A. (2010). The views of the teachers about the mind mapping technique in the elementary life science and social studies lessons based on the constructivist method. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 10(3), 1637–1656. Accessed from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ919863
Sternberg, R. J. (2012). The assessment of creativity: An investment-based approach. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 3–12. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.652925.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukmaningrum, A., & Imron, A. (2017). Memanfaatkan usia produktif dengan usaha kreatif industri pembuatan kaos pada remaja di Gresik. Jurnal Paradigma, 5(3), 1–6. Accessed from https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/paradigma/article/view/21647
Treffinger, D. J., Young, G. C., Selby, E. C., & Shepardson, C. (2002). Assessing Creativity: A Guide for Educators. Florida: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. Accessed from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED505548
Trisdiono, H., & Muda, W. (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran Abad 21. Yogyakarta: Lembaga Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Provinsi Yogyakarta.
Zubaidah, S., Fuad, N. M., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E. (2017). Improving creative thinking skills of students through Differentiated Science Inquiry integrated with mind map. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4), 77–91. Accessed from http://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/175.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi (Biosferjpb) and Departement of Biology Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta as publisher of the journal.
