The Effect of SATL Strategy Integrated with Problem-Based Learning on Students' Conceptual Understanding of Compound Nomenclature and Chemical Equations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/JRPK.161.06Keywords:
Systemic Approach Teaching and Learning (SATL), Conceptual Understanding, Compound Nomenclature, Chemical EquationsAbstract
This research aims to determine the effect of appliying the Systemic Approach Teaching and Learning (SATL) strategy on the conceptual understanding of grade X students on the material of compound names and reaction equations. The research was conducted in the even semester of the 2023/2024 academic year at SMA Negeri 68 Jakarta. The type of research used is quantitative research with quasi experimental method and with a Pretest Posttest Nonequivalent Control Group Design. The research sample was obtained through purposive sampling technique with class X-2 serving as the experimental class which used the Systemic Approach Teaching and Learning (SATL) strategy using the problem based learning (PBL) model and class X-4 serving as the control class which used problem based learning (PBL) model without using strategy. The results showed that the average posttest of the experimental class (85,71) was higher than control class (76,91). Based on the results of the U Mann Whitney test calculation, the Asymp.Sig.(2-tailed) value is 0,047 so it can be concluded that 0,047<0,05 which means that H0 is rejected. Based on the results obtained, it can be concluded that the application of Systemic Approach Teaching and Learning (SATL) strategy has a positive effect on the conceptual understanding of class X students on the material of Compound Names and Reaction Equations.
References
Ardianti, Y., & Amalia, N. (2022). Kurikulum merdeka: Pemaknaan merdeka dalam perencanaan pembelajaran di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 6(3), 399–407. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppp.v6i3.55749
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Fahmy, A. F. M., & Lagowski, J. J. (2000). Systemic approach in classification of elements. Science Education Center.
Gulo, W. (2008). Strategi belajar mengajar. Grasindo.
Indarta, Y., Jalinus, J., Waskito, W., Samala, A. D., Riyanda, A. R., & Adi, N. H. (2022). Relevansi kurikulum merdeka belajar dengan model pembelajaran abad 21 dalam perkembangan era Society 5.0. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(2), 3011–3024. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i2.2589
Leigh, G. J., Favre, H. A., & Metanomski, W. V. (1998). Principles of chemical nomenclature: A guide to IUPAC recommendations. Blackwell Science.
Sukmawati, R. (2017). Pengaruh pembelajaran interaktif dengan strategi drill terhadap kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematika mahasiswa. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 10(2), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v10i2.2034
Suryani, E. (2019). Analisis pemahaman konsep: Two-tier test sebagai alternatif. CV Pilar Nusantara.
Vachliotis, T., Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. (2021). Developing basic systems thinking skills for deeper understanding of chemistry concepts in high school students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, Article 100881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100881
