Cognitive Domain in Bahasa Inggris: Train of Thoughts Textbook: An Analysis of the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy

Authors

  • Nurul Aini Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Rika Andayani Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Suci Maharani Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/stairs.7.1.6

Keywords:

Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy, Cognitive Domain, Reading Comorehension, Textbook analysis

Abstract

The cognitive domain in reading activities is essential for enhancing students’ critical thinking abilities. This research used Bloom's Revised Taxonomy to analyze the cognitive process and knowledge dimension in the reading comprehension activities of the English textbook Bahasa Inggris: Train of Thoughts for twelfth graders. A content analysis method was employed in this research. The research tool was a Bloom's Revised Taxonomy checklist table that was modified from Anderson & Krathwohl (2001). The reading comprehension activities, comprising reading questions and reading instruction assignments, found in the twelfth-grade textbook Bahasa Inggris: Train of Thoughts, served as the research's data source. The study revealed that Lower-Order Thinking Skills (LOTS) occurred more frequently than Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS), with 106 occurrences, or 75.2% of the total data. Furthermore, with 65 frequencies, or 46.1%, the understanding level is mainly used as a cognitive process.  This textbook also primarily used conceptual knowledge, with 93 frequencies, or 65.9%.  In summary, the knowledge dimension of this textbook relied on conceptual knowledge and the understanding level of the LOTS category as its cognitive process. As such, it is advised that teachers not rely solely on this textbook for instructional purposes and that they include teaching resources that apply the HOTS category.

References

Aghaei, K., & Rad, E. M. (2018). On the interconnection between Bloom’s critical thinking taxonomy & listening comprehension performance of Iranian EFL learners‫‏‬. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 22–31. www.eltsjournal.org‬‬‬‬‬

Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Addison Wesley Longman.

Arisman, Maisarah, I., Yunita, W., Sujarwati, I., & Sofyan, D. (2024). An analysis of higher order thinking skill (HOTS) in Merdeka Curriculum English textbook “Pathway to English” published by Erlangga for grade X of senior high school. Jurnal Bilingual, 14(1).

Arlansyah, A., Puspita, H., & Saputra, E. (2023). Reading questions in “English for Nusantara” textbook by using revised Bloom’s taxonomy. Journal of English Education and Teaching (JEET), 7(2), 361–375.

Aulia, F., & Permana, S. (2021). The incorporation of higher order thinking skills in Ruangguru application for senior high school tenth graders. STAIRS: English Language Education Journal, 2(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.21009/stairs.2.1.4

Damanik, S. N. H., & Zainil, Y. (2019). The analysis of reading comprehension questions in English textbook by using higher order thinking skill at grade X of SMAN 2 Padang. Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(1). http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/jelt

Daniati, N., & Fitrawati. (2020). High order thinking skill questions in reading exercises (An analysis of reading exercises in Bright an English course book for the grade IX of junior high school, published by Erlangga in 2018). Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(2). http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/jelt

Djami, C. B. N., & Kuswandono, P. (2020). Teachers’ strategies to implement higher-order thinking skills in English instruction. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 4(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v4i1.2048

Fakhira, J., & Iskandar, I. (2020). The incorporation of high order thinking skills in exercises of the eleventh graders English textbook. STAIRS: English Language Education Journal, 1(2), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.21009/stairs.1.2.5

Febriyana, F., & Harjanto, I. (2023). Cognitive levels of questions by Indonesian teachers of English. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 8(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v8i2.1032

Ginting, A. A., & Kuswandono, P. (2020). Challenges faced by English teachers: Implementation of higher order thinking skills (HOTS) in designing assignments in East Indonesia. Pedagogy Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.32332/pedagogy.v8i1.1688

Gunawan, M. H., Masbirorotni, & Safitri, N. T. (2023). Teacher’s perception of using English textbook in teaching English for Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Munawwaroh Jambi. Langue (Journal of Language and Education), 1(2), 2023. https://doi.org/10.22437/langue.v

Istiqomah, S., Indah, R. N., & al Aziz, E. N. (2023). Difficulties and strategies of learning English reading skills in large classes: A systematic literature review. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning (JETLE), 4(2), 70–83.

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology (Fourth Edition). Sage Publications.

Laila, I., & Fitriyah, I. (2022). An analysis of reading comprehension questions in English textbook based on revised Bloom’s taxonomy. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 8(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v8i1.3394

Nugraha AJR, A. E., Al-Baekani, A. K., & Hakim, P. K. (2024). An analysis of writing task in English textbook for seventh grade of junior high school based on cognitive domain of revised Bloom's taxonomy. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching & Learning, Linguistics & Literature, 12(1), 258–277. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v12i1.4123

Priantini, D. A. M. M. O., Suarni, N. K., & Adnyana, I. K. S. (2022). Analisis Kurikulum Merdeka dan platform Merdeka Belajar untuk mewujudkan pendidikan yang berkualitas. JURNAL PENJAMINAN MUTU, 8(2). http://ojs.uhnsugriwa.ac.id/index.php/JPM

Ripalga, & Fitrawati. (2023). An analysis of questions on reading tasks in the English textbook “Work in Progress” in Merdeka Curriculum. Journal of English Language Teaching, 12(2), 570–581. https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v12i2.123128

Sadora, E., Faridi, A., & Suwandi, S. (2021). Formative assessment based on revised Bloom’s taxonomy in Merdeka Curriculum English textbook. The Journal of Educational Development, 139–148. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jed

Saputra, H. T., & Pujiati, H. (2021). Cognitive domain of revised Bloom taxonomy in English student book. JELLT (Journal of English Language and Literature Teaching), 6(1).

Setyowati, Y., Susanto, & Munir, A. (2022). Critical thinking within the context of the revised Bloom’s taxonomy in written language tests. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute Journal. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.5348

Sunengsih, Syahrizal, T., Defianty, M., Anggraini, W. A., Setiawan, G. A., & Dadan. (2022). Bahasa Inggris: Train of Thoughts (K. A. M. Capa, Ed.; First). The Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.