The Structure of the Graduate Profile Text of the Master of Indonesian Language Education Study Program Which is Accredited as Excellent in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21009/ijlecr.v11i2.64861Keywords:
Text Structure, Graduate Profile, Master of Indonesian Language Education Study Program, Accredited with ExcellenceAbstract
Graduate profiles are very important for study programs in higher education because they serve as the main guideline in developing the curriculum and determining the competencies that graduates must have. Study programs that are accredited as superior usually have graduate profiles that have a clear, systematic, and directed text structure. Therefore, this study aims to describe the structure of the graduate profile text of the Master of Language Education Study Program PLIndonesia which is accredited as superior in Indonesia. The Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) method is used to analyze the structure of the graduate profile text of the study program. The data collection technique used is the documentation technique sourced from the website of the Master of Indonesian Language Education Study Program which is accredited as superior in Indonesia. The data analysis technique uses the SFL technique with the following steps: constituent structure, grammatical constituent analysis, and labeling based on class or function. The results of the study show that the structure of the graduate profile text of the Master of Indonesian Language Education Study Program which is accredited as superior in Indonesia is dominated by nominal phrases with a fixed pattern (NP + PrepF) that describe professions and fields of expertise. Functionally, the graduate profile acts as a Subject (S) which contains an implicit predicative meaning according to the main competencies. Furthermore, based on the cognitive levels in Anderson & Krathwohl's taxonomy, it demonstrates high competencies, namely applying, analyzing, and creating, which confirms the profile of Master's graduates as middle-level experts and professionals.
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Barnad, B., & Tedjokusumo, E. P. (2023). Reorientasi profil lulusan dan reformasi kurikulum solusi lulusan terserap lapangan kerja. Jurnal Bisnis Terapan, 7(2), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.24123/jbt.v7i2.5621
Bhatia, V. K. (2014). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Routledge.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Caffarel, A. (2014). Learning advanced french through SFL learning SFL in French. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Cheetham, G. & Chivers, G. (1996). Towards a holistic model of professional competence. Journal of European Industrial Training, 20(5), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090599610119692
Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. New York: Oxpord University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.
Harden, R. M. (2007). Outcome-based education: The future is today. Medical Teacher, 29(7), 625–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701729930
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Kusumawardani, S. S. dkk. (2024). Buku panduan penyusunan kurikulum pendidikan tinggi mendukung merdeka belajar-kampus merdeka menuju Indonesia emas. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Riset, dan Teknologi, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Lembaga Akreditasi Mandiri Kependidikan. (2022). Buku 3 panduan penyusunan laporan evaluasi diri. Jakarta: Lembaga Akreditasi Mandiri Kependidikan (Lamdik). https://lamdik.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Lampiran-5-Peraturan-BAN-PT-2-2022-IAPS-Kependidikan.pdf
Lembaga Akreditasi Mandiri Kependidikan. (2025). Akreditasi program studi program magister untuk memperoleh status terakreditasi unggul: Buku 3 panduan penyusunan led dan pengisian data kinerja program studi. Jakarta: Lembaga Akreditasi Mandiri Kependidikan, Republik Indonesia.
Lu, A. (2013). A functional grammar approach to analysing Asian students’ writing. American Journal of Educational Research, 1(2), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-1-2-3
Marlianto, F., Sabirin, F., & Sulistiyarini, D. (2022). Faktor – faktor yang mempengaruhi profil lulusan pendidikan teknologi informasi. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(3), 3545–3553. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i3.2632
Martin, J. R. (2015). Cohesion and texture. In Tannen, D., Hamilton, H.E., & Schiffrin, D., Eds., The handbook of discourse analysis (2ndEd). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, 61-80.
Maswani, M. (2016). Profil kompetensi lulusan Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Arab perspektif stakeholder. Arabiyat : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Dan Kebahasaaraban, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/a.v3i2.4163
Ngadiman, N. (2014). Profil lulusan (tracer study) program studi pendidikan ekonomi yang bekerja di dunia usaha dan industri 2000-2005. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v6i1.1796
Noermanzah, N., & Yanti, N. (2024). Structure of the vision and mission text of the Indonesian language education masters study program accredited as excellent in Indonesia. IJLECR (International Journal of Language Education and Cultural Review), 10(2), 164–175. https://doi.org/10.21009/ijlecr.v10i2.52201
Oliver, B. (2013). Graduate attributes as a focus for institution-wide curriculum renewal. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(3), 450–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.682052
Prabowo, A. E., Wahjoedi, W., Utomo, S. H., & Haryono, A. (2020). Profil lulusan perguruan tinggi swasta Indonesia ditinjau dari tempat kerja lulusan. Perspektif Pendidikan Dan Keguruan, 11(2), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.25299/perspektif.2020.vol11(2).5574
Pratama, Y. D., Bendi, K. J., & Mustika, S. W. A. (2021). Analisis profil lulusan program studi teknik industri berdasarkan kebutuhan pasar kerja. SAINTEK : Jurnal Ilmiah Sains Dan Teknologi Industri, 2(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.32524/saintek.v2i2.137
Putri, R. N., & Talaar, V. S. N. (2023). Metode SFL pada pembelajaran IFL. Karimah Tauhid, 2(3), 779–784. https://doi.org/10.30997/karimahtauhid.v2i3.9369
Saifudin, A. (2024). Evaluasi penyusunan profil lulusan program studi kefarmasian berbasis locus dan body of knowledge. Jurnal Pharmascience, 11(1), 180. https://doi.org/10.20527/jps.v11i1.17599
Sipayung, K. T., Sianipar, V. M. B., Saragih, R. B., Gultom, S. P., Sitinjak, G., Sitohang, H., & Simarmata, J. J. P. (2023). Persepsi peserta kampus mengajar terhadap profil lulusan program studi. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(1), 628–641. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v5i1.4069
Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome-based education: Critical issues and answers. Arlington: American Association of School Administrators.
Suwandi, dkk. (2024). Standar nasional program studi pendidikan bahasa dan sastra Indonesia program sarjana, magister, dan doktor (jenjang s1, s2, dan s3). Surakarta: Ikaprobsi Press.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi. Jakarta: Kementerian Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.
Wiratno, T. (2018). Pengantar ringkas linguistik sistemik fungsional. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Noermanzah Noermanzah, Nafri Yanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
