Group Investigation and Explicit learning Models in Learning Physics at Senior High Schools

Authors

  • I Wayan Santyasa Magister Program of Instructional Technology, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • I Nyoman Kanca Magister Program of Instructional Technology, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • I Wayan Sukra Warpala Magister Program of Instructional Technology, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • I Komang Sudarma Magister Program of Instructional Technology, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/1.05216

Keywords:

GI and EL models, critical thinking, social attitude, spiritual attitude, character

Abstract

Physics teaching in high school is still dominated by explicit learning models, relatively rarely empowering the potential of group inquiry based on social interaction. This has become one of the reasons for the lack of optimal student learning products. This study aimed to analyze the difference of effect between the group investigation (GI) model and the explicit learning (EL) model in achieving critical thinking skill, social attitude, spiritual attitudes, and student character in learning physics. To achieve this goal, a quasi-experimental study was conducted using a nonequivalence posttest only control group design. The study population was 16 classes (566 people) XI MIPA class students who came from two SMAs, namely 8 classes (280 students) SMA 1 Tabanan and 8 classes (286 students) SMA 1 Kediri Tabanan. The sample in each high school consisted of 2 classes selected by a random assignment technique. The whole sample was 4 classes (140 students, or 24.73% of the total population), 2 classes learned with GI model and 2 classes with the EL model, each learned sound wave and lightwave. Data on students' critical thinking skill was collected by 12 items test. Data on students’ social attitude, spiritual attitude, and  character were collected with a social attitude questionnaire which consists of 30 items, a spiritual attitude questionnaire which consists of 30 items, and  a character questionnaire which consists of 18 items. The research data were analyzed by one way MANOVA. The results showed that the GI model had a higher effect than the EL model in achieving critical thinking skill, social attitude, spiritual attitude, and the character of the students in learning sound wave and lightwave in  high school  physics.

References

Achmad, W. K. S., Bundu, P., Suradi & Jufri, M 2018, ‘Application of group investigation (GI) learning model in Pendidikan IPS SD course to improve students’ critical thinking skills at PGSD Universitas Negeri Makassar’, IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), vol. 8, Number 2, pp. 41-46.
Agboola, A & Tsai, K. C 2012, ‘Bring character education into classroom’, European Journal Of Educational Research, vol. 1, number 12, pp. 163-170.
Ahsanah, F 2015, ‘Group investigation: A cooperative learning method for the 10th grade students in speaking english classroom’, TELL Journal, vol. 3, number 1, pp. 57-69.
AKÇAY1, N. O & DOYMUŞ, K 2012, ‘The effects of group investigation and cooperative learning techniques applied in teaching force and motion subjects on students’ academic achievements’, Journal of Educational Sciences Research, vol. 2, number 1, pp. 109-123.
Astiti, K. A 2018, ‘The effect of group investigation learning model with brainstorming technique on students learning outcomes’, SHS Web of Conferences, vol. 42, 00122 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/ 20184200122.
De Jager Meezenbroek, E., Garssen, B. ., Van Den Berg, M., Tuytel, G., Dierendonck, D. V., Visser, A & Schaufeli, W. B 2012, ‘Measuring spirituality as a universal human experience: Development of the spiritual attitude and involvement list (SAIL)’, Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, vol. 30, pp. 141-167.
Dodds, D. M 2016, ‘The Effects of Character Education on Social-Emotional Behavior’, Retrieved from Sophia, the St. Catherine University repository website: https://sophia.stkate.edu/ maed/137, pp. 1-33.
Dostál. J 2015, ‘The definition of the term Inquiry-based instruction’, International Journal of Instruction, vol. 8, number 2, pp. 69-82.
Egan, K 2001, ‘Spirituality, education, and the moral life’, Paper, delivered to the AERA conference held in Seattle, WA, on April 10-14.
Ennis, R. H 2013, ‘The nature of critical thinking: Outlines of general critical thinking dispositions’, Online article. http://criticalthinking.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/ The-Nature-of-Critical-Thinking.pdf.
Fathurahman, P 2012, ‘Model of the character education in developing countries’, Journal of Applied Sciences Research, vo. 8, no. 3, pp. 1813-1816.
Gardner, H. “The dicipline mind: What all students should understand”, (Simon & Schuster Inc, New York, 1999).
Goleman, D. “Emotional intelligence” (PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, 2000).
Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D & Smaldino, S. E. “Instructional media and technology for learning, 7th edition” (Prentice Hall, Inc, New Jersey, 2002).
Howarth, C 2006, ‘How social representations of attitudes have informed attitude theories: The consensual and the reified’, Theory and Psychology, vol. 16, number 5, pp. 691-714.
Indarti, D., Mardiyana & Pramudya, I 2017, ‘Group investigation with scientific approach in mathematics learning’, International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Education 2017 (ICMSE2017), IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 983 (2018) 012147 DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012147.
Iswardati 2016, ‘The implementation of group investigation to improve the students’ speaking skill’, Dinamika Ilmu, vol. 16, number 2, pp. 245-261.
Luke. A 2014, ‘On explicit and direct instruction’, Australian Literacy Educator’s Association, More alea ‘hot topics’ at www.alea.edu.au.
Parinduri, S. H., Sirait, M & Sani, R. A 2017, ‘The effect of cooperative learning model type group investigation for student’s conceptual knowledge and science process skills’, IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), vol. 7, number 4, pp. 49-54.
Pitoyo, A., Waluyo, H. J., Suwandi, S & Andayani, 2014, ‘The effect of group investigation learning model, accelerated team and role playing on elementary school students’ writing skills viewed from cognitive style’, Journal of Education and Practice, vol. 5, number 1, pp. 21-29.
Raka, G., Mulyana, Y., Markam, S. S., Semiawan, C. R., Hasan, S. H., Bastaman, H. D & Nuracham, N. “Pendidikan karakter di sekolah: Dari gagasan ke tindakan” (Elex Media Komputindo, Jakarta, 2011).
Sari, E 2017, ‘Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe group investigation terhadap hasil belajar fisika ditinjau dati kemampuan berpikir logis’, Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 6, number 1, pp. 27-32.
Santyasa, I W. “Asesmen dan evaluasi pembelajaran fisika” (Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta, 2014).
Santyasa, I W. “Pembelajaran inovatif” (Undiksha Pres, Singaraja, 2017).
Santyasa, I W & Suwindra, I N. P 2009, ‘Pengembangan pemahaman konsep dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika bagi siswa SMA dengan pemberdayaan model perubahan konseptual berseting investigasi kelompok’, Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, vol. 3, number 1, pp. 1-16.
Siddiqui, M. H 2013, ‘Group investigation model of teaching: Enhancing learning level’, Paripex - Indian Journal Of Research, vol. 3, number 4, pp. 78-80.
Slavin, R. E. “Cooperative learning, 2nd edition” (Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 1995).
Suyanto 2000, ‘Urgensi pendidikan karakter’, http://waskitamandiribk.wordpress.com/ 2010/06/02/urgensi-pendidikan-karakter/.
Yahya Khan, D. “Pendidikan karakter berbasis potensi diri mendongkrak kualitas pendidikan” (Pelangi, Yogyakarta, 2010).
Yuandini, F & Sahyar 2017, ‘The effect of cooperative learning model type group investigation assisted flash media, scientific attitude on students’ conceptual knowledge’, Journal of Education and Practice, vol. 8, number 17, pp. 150-155.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-28

How to Cite

Santyasa, I. W., Kanca, I. N., Warpala, I. W. S., & Sudarma, I. K. (2019). Group Investigation and Explicit learning Models in Learning Physics at Senior High Schools. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 5(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.05216

Similar Articles

<< < 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.