STEM-Based Physics Modules with CK-12 Simulations for High School Students: Development and Implementation

Nurlina Nurlina; Musdar M.; Kartika Hajati; Ulfa Zulfiani

doi:10.21009/1.10215

Authors

Nurlina Nurlina Program of Study in Physics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sulawesi Barat, Majene 91412, Sulawesi Barat, Indonesia
Musdar M. Program of Study in Physics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sulawesi Barat, Majene 91412, Sulawesi Barat, Indonesia
Kartika Hajati Program of Study in Physics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sulawesi Barat, Majene 91412, Sulawesi Barat, Indonesia
Ulfa Zulfiani Program of Study in Physics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sulawesi Barat, Majene 91412, Sulawesi Barat, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/1.10215

Keywords:

physics module, CK-12 simulations, STEM, research and development

Abstract

Research has been conducted to develop STEM-based physics modules with CK-12 simulations for high school students. This study evaluates the STEM-based physics module’s validity, practicality, and effectiveness with CK-12 simulations for grade X students. The research employed research and development (R&D), utilizing the ADDIE model, which includes the stages of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The study involved three expert validators and students from two schools to assess the module’s validity, practicality, and effectiveness. The participants comprised grades X MIA students from SMAN 1 Alu and X IPA students from MAN 2 Polewali Mandar. The validity of the developed physics modules, presented as a practical module, was assessed through expert validation, while practicality was evaluated using response questionnaires completed by students and teachers. Effectiveness was determined based on student learning outcome tests. The results indicate that the physics module was highly valid, with an overall validity score of 87.78%. Practicality was also rated highly, with scores of 90.29% from students and 99.00% from teachers. Furthermore, the module demonstrated effectiveness, as evidenced by student learning outcomes meeting the established criteria, with an effectiveness score of 79.17%. These findings suggest that STEM-based physics modules with CK-12 simulations can significantly enhance the quality of physics teaching and learning for high school students. In addition, this research should be explored for other topics.

References

Abdi, M.U., Mustafa, M. and Pada, A.U.T. (2021). Penerapan Pendekatan STEM Berbasis Simulasi PhET Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Peserta Didik. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA, 5(3), pp.209–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v5i3.21774.

Alexandru Maries and Singh, C. (2024). Towards meaningful diversity, equity and inclusion in physics learning environments. Nature Physics, 20(3), pp.367–375. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02391-6.

Christian, K.B., Kelly, A.M. and Bugallo, M.F. (2021). NGSS-based teacher professional development to implement engineering practices in STEM instruction. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00284-1.

Darmawansah, D., Hwang, G.-J., Chen, M.-R.A. and Liang, J.-C. (2023). Trends and research foci of robotics-based STEM education: a systematic review from diverse angles based on the technology-based learning model. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00400-3.

Farah, RN, Amarpreet, K, Nida, SU, Joanna, D, Nuzlinda, AR and Nasrudin, MR. (2021). The Usability of CK-12 Application in Teaching and Learning in 21st Century for Topic Statistics Among Form 4 Students in USJ, Subang Jaya. Review of International Geographical Education, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 963-971. doi:https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.8006810.

Kencana, M.A., Musri and Syukri, M. (2020). The effect of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) on students’ creative thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460, p.012141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012141.

Ketang Wiyono, Sury, K., Riski Nur Hidayah, Nauratun Nazhifah, Ismet Ismet and Sudirman Sudirman. (2022). STEM-based E-learning: Implementation and Effect on Communication and Collaboration Skills on Wave Topic. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 8(2), pp.259–270. doi:https://doi.org/10.21009/1.08208.

Knewstubb, B. (2014). The learning–teaching nexus: modelling the learning–teaching relationship in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 41(3), pp.525–540. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.934802.

Musdar, M. (2020). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berorientasi Proses Sains Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Ilmiah’, PHYDAGOGIC. Jurnal Fisika dan Pembelajarannya, 3(1), pp. 25–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.31605/phy.v3i1.1002.

Mastuti, M., Nurlina, N. and Mutmainna, M. (2022). Identifikasi Kesulitan Belajar Peserta Didik Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Secara Daring Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. PHYDAGOGIC : Jurnal Fisika dan Pembelajarannya, 5(1), pp. 32–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.31605/phy.v5i1.2091.

Nasution, S 2010, Berbagai Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar & Mengajar, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Neumann, I., Sorge, S., Hoth, J., Lindmeier, A., Neumann, K. and Heinze, A. (2021). Synergy Effects in Learning? The Influence of Mathematics as a Second Subject on Teacher Students’ Physics Content Knowledge. Studies in Higher Education, 46(10), pp.2035–2046. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1953335.

Oktaviana, M., Putri, D. H. and Risdianto, E. (2020). Pengembangan Modul Elektronik Berbantuan Simulasi PhET pada Pokok Bahasan Gerak Harmonik Sederhana di SMA. Jurnal Kumparan Fisika, 3(2), pp. 131–140. doi: https://doi.org/10.33369/jkf.3.2.131-140.

Perdana, R., Jumadi, J. and Rosana, D. (2019). Relationship between Analytical Thinking Skill and Scientific Argumentation Using PBL with Interactive CK 12 Simulation. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 1(1), pp. 16–23. Available at: https://interactives.ck12.org/simulations/physics.html.

Putri, R. O. E. (2021). STEM (Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics) : Sebuah Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Mendukung Merdeka Belajar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Unim, pp. 103–108.

Rosen, D. and Kelly, A. M. (2023). Mixed methods study of student participation and self-efficacy in remote asynchronous undergraduate physics laboratories: contributors, lurkers, and outsiders. International Journal of STEM Education. Springer International Publishing, 10(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00428-5.

Rosmiati, R., M, M. and Nurlina, N. (2022). Penerapan Model Project Based Learning Berbantuan Simulasi PhET untuk Meningkatkan High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Fisika. PHYDAGOGIC : Jurnal Fisika dan Pembelajarannya, 4(2), pp. 107–115. doi: https://doi.org/10.31605/phy.v4i2.1806.

Santi, I., & Santosa, R. (2016). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran menggunakan pendekatan saintifik pada materi pokok geometri ruang SMP. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 35-44. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pg.v11i1.9673

Santoso, S. H. and Mosik, M. (2019). Keefektifan LKS Berbasis STEM (Science, Tehnology, Engineering and Mathematic) untuk Melatih Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa pada Pembelajaran Fisika SMA. Unnes Physics Education Jurnal, 8(3), pp. 248–253. https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v8i3.35622

Sari, D. K. (2021). Pengembangan E-Modul Praktikum Fisika Dasar 1 dengan Pendekatan STEM untuk Menumbuhkan Kemandirian Belajar. DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik, 5(1), p. 44. doi: https://doi.org/10.20961/jdc.v5i1.50560.

Schiering, D., Sorge, S. and Neumann, K. (2021). Promoting progression in higher education teacher training: how does cognitive support enhance student physics teachers’ content knowledge development? Studies in Higher Education, 46(10), pp.2022–2034. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1953337.

Sholikhah, Z. and Sucahyo, I. (2021). Pengembagan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) Berbantuan Simulasi Phet Pada Materi Fluida Dinamis. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 5(3), pp. 372–378. doi: https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.5.3.372-378.

Soesilo, A. and Munthe, A. P. (2020). Pengembangan Buku Teks Matematika Kelas 8 Dengan Model ADDIE. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 10(3), pp. 231–243. doi: https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2020.v10.i3.p231-243.

Sukmagati, P. O., Yulianti, D. and Sugianto. (2020). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa (LKS) Berbasis STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMP. Unnes PhysicsEducation Journal, 9(1), pp. 19–26. https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v9i1.38277.

Suryaningsih, Y. (2017). Pembelajaran Berbasis Praktikum sebagai Sarana Siswa untuk Berlatih Menerapkan Keterampilan Proses Sains dalam Materi Biologi. Jurnal Bio Educatio, 2(2), pp. 49–57.

Vedrenne-Gutiérrez, F. et al. (2024). The axiological foundations of innovation in STEM education – A systematic review and ethical meta-analysis. Heliyon, 10(12). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32381.

White, S.K. (2023). Making a Framework for Formative Inquiry Within Integrated STEM Learning Environments. In: Hokanson, B., Schmidt, M., Exter, M.E., Tawfik, A.A., Earnshaw, Y. (eds) Formative Design in Learning. Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41950-8_13

Yildirim, B. (2016). An analyses and meta-synthesis of research on STEM education. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(34), pp. 23–33.