Computer Vision on Education: Fostering AI Literacy using RBL-STEM with Google Teachable Machine

Authors

  • Zainur Rasyid Ridlo Department of Science Education, University of Jember, Jl. Kalimantan Tegalboto No.37, Jember, Jawa Timur 68121, Indonesia
  • Dafik Department of Mathematics Education Postgraduate, University of Jember, Jl. Kalimantan Tegalboto No.37, Jember, Jawa Timur 68121, Indonesia
  • Silvi Putri Ayu Ningsih Department of Science Education, University of Jember, Jl. Kalimantan Tegalboto No.37, Jember, Jawa Timur 68121, Indonesia
  • Azza Liarista Anggraini Faculty of Education, specialising in Digital Learning, Monash University, Wellington Rd, Clayton VIC 3800, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/1.11205

Keywords:

Computer Vision, AI literacy, CNN, Google Teachable Machine, RBL-STEM

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of the RBL-STEM learning model using Google Teachable Machine as a computer vision-based learning media to improve AI literacy. The Research Based Learning-STEM (RBL-STEM) learning model is a learning model that integrates research activities in learning using the STEM approach. Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is a branch of computer vision that uses artificial intelligence algorithms that are very effective in developing AI products to process image-shaped data. This study utilized a mixed methods approach that integrates quantitative and qualitative techniques to explore the improvement of AI literacy. The participants in this study were 139 undergraduate students of science education study program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Jember who participated in the study were taking introductory information technology courses for science education, the sample selection method used was purposive sampling. The quantitative method utilized a pre-test and post-test design, which included the analysis of mean scores, standard deviation, and the observed increase in mean scores. The quantitative method used a survey on AI literacy. The pretest mean score was 38.33 with a standard deviation of 13.41, while the posttest mean score was 71.49 with a standard deviation of 9.37 with a Wilcoxon signed rank-test result of -8.468, indicating a significant effect of the RBL-STEM learning model on students' AI literacy. The high standard deviation on the pretest indicates that there is a large variation in the AI literacy level of the students before the learning begins. This is due to students' different backgrounds, experiences and understanding of AI technology. Some students may be familiar with AI, while others have not been exposed to it at all. This inequality causes a wide spread of scores. After the implementation of the RBL-STEM model with Google Teachable Machine, the standard deviation decreased, indicating that this learning not only improved the average AI literacy, but also made the improvement more even. The AI literacy survey results showed an average score of 3.48, indicating that 69% of students showed an understanding of AI literacy. The implementation of the RBL-STEM model of teaching with Google Teachable Machine is able to train students to conduct research integrated in learning activities, the role of Google Teachable machine as an AI-based learning media is able to improve student AI literacy because the use of AI-based learning media creates a new, interactive, and fun learning atmosphere. Based on the findings of the analysis, it can be concluded that the application of the RBL-STEM model has a significant impact in improving students' AI literacy.

References

Bhargava, A. and Bansal, A. (2018). Fruits and vegetables quality evaluation using computer vision: A review. Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, 33(3), pp. 243–257. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2018.06.002

Carney, M., Webster, B., Alvarado, I., Phillips, K., Howell, N., Griffith, J., Jongejan, J., Pitaru, A. and Chen, A. (2020). Teachable Machine: Approachable web-based tool for exploring machine learning classification. Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382894

Dafik. Kadir, N., Maryati, T., Sufirman, N. and Ridlo, Z.R. (2023). The analysis of the implementation of RBL-STEM learning materials in improving student’s meta-literacy ability to solve wallpaper decoration problems using local antimagic graph coloring techniques. Heliyon, 9(6), p.e17433. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17433

de Oliveira, E.M., Leme, D.S., Barbosa, B.H.G., Rodarte, M.P. and Pereira, R.G.F.A. (2016). A computer vision system for coffee beans classification based on computational intelligence techniques. Journal of Food Engineering, 171, pp. 22–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.01.001

Ding, Y., Wang, L., Li, Y. and Li, D. (2018). Model predictive control and its application in agriculture: A review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 151, pp. 104–117. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.06.004

Gita, R.S.D., Adhim, F., Jayawardana, H. and Hariyanto, F. (2024). Development of Android-based E-learning platform with RBL-STEM approach to improve digital literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(10), pp. 7597–7605. doi: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i10.8901

Gomiero, T. (2018). Agriculture and degrowth: State of the art and assessment of organic and biotech based agriculture from a degrowth perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, pp. 1823–1839. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.237

Hossain, M.A. and Alam Sajib, M.S. (2019). Classification of image using convolutional neural network (CNN). Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology, pp.13–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.34257/gjcstdvol19is2pg13

Kasinidou, M. (2023). AI literacy for all: A participatory approach. In: Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Vol. 2, pp.607–608. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3587103.3594135

Khan, A., Sohail, A., Zahoora, U. and Qureshi, A.S. (2020). A survey of the recent architectures of deep convolutional neural networks. Artificial Intelligence Review, 53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09825-6

Khan, A.I. and Al Habsi, S. (2020). Machine learning in computer vision. Procedia Computer Science, 167, pp.1444–1451. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.326

Kong, S.-C., Cheung, W.M.-Y. and Zhang, G. (2021). Evaluation of an artificial intelligence literacy course for university students with diverse study backgrounds. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, p.100026. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100026

Kurz, T.L., Jayasuriya, S., Swisher, K., Mativo, J., Pidaparti, R. and Robinson, D.T. (2024). The impact of Teachable Machine on middle school teachers’ perceptions of science lessons after professional development. Education Sciences, 14(4), p.417. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040417

Lamsal, R.R. and Lamsal, S. (2025). Introducing image classification through no-code Teachable Machine platform: An intuitive approach for novice learners. Preprint on ResearchGate.

Matsuzaka, Y. and Yashiro, R. (2023). AI-based computer vision techniques and expert systems. AI, 4(1), pp.289–302. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ai4010013

Ramos, P.J., Prieto, F.A., Montoya, E.C. and Oliveros, C.E. (2017). Automatic fruit count on coffee branches using computer vision. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 137, pp.9–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.02.011

Ridlo, Z.R., Dafik. Waluyo, J. and Yushardi. (2024). Exploring the impact of makerspace-based learning materials on students’ computational thinking skills: Using machine learning to address challenges in smart coffee agroforestry. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(5), pp.52–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1630

Ridlo, Z.R., Indrawati. Afafa, L., Bahri, S., Kamila, I.S. and Rusdianto. (2021). The effectiveness of research-based learning model of teaching integrated with computer simulation in astronomy course in improving student computational thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1839(1), p.012027. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1839/1/012027

Russell, S.J. and Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: A modern approach. 4th ed. Pearson.

Sagala, T.R., Aulia, M.P., Haryanti, S.R. and Joharis, M. (2025). Improving AI literacy competence among European students: Implementation recommendations for Indonesian student. International Journal of Educational Development, 2(2), pp.57–67. doi: https://doi.org/10.61132/ijed.v2i2.300

Sarwanti, S., Sariasih, Y., Rahmatika, L., Islam, M.M. and Riantina, E.M. (2024). Are they literate on ChatGPT? University language students’ perceptions, benefits and challenges in higher education learning. Online Learning, 28(3), pp.105–130. doi: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.4599

Tzirides, A.O., Zapata, G., Kastania, N.P., Saini, A.K., Castro, V., Ismael, S.A. and Kalantzis, M. (2024). Combining human and artificial intelligence for enhanced AI literacy in higher education. Computers and Education Open, 6, p.100184. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100184

Wan, P., Toudeshki, A., Tan, H. and Ehsani, R. (2018). A methodology for fresh tomato maturity detection using computer vision. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 146, pp.43–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.05.017

Yi, Y. (2021). Establishing the concept of AI literacy. JAHR, 12(2), pp.353–368. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-020-00930-7

Downloads

Published

2025-09-10

How to Cite

Ridlo, Z. R., Dafik, Silvi Putri Ayu Ningsih, & Azza Liarista Anggraini. (2025). Computer Vision on Education: Fostering AI Literacy using RBL-STEM with Google Teachable Machine. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 11(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.11205

Similar Articles

> >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.