Kapabilitas Dinamis Sebagai Kerangka Konseptual dalam Pengembangan Model Penilaian Kinerja Sekolah
Keywords:
dynamic capabilities, school performance, educational innovation, adaptability, educational qualityAbstract
For remote cross-functional teams, conflict resolution is an additional crucial factor to consider. The lack of face-to-face communication can sometimes lead to misunderstandings or exacerbate disputes. Using proactive conflict resolution measures, such as setting clear communication expectations and providing channels for resolving issues, can effectively reduce potential conflicts. Promoting transparent and respectful communication, as well as offering assistance in conflict mediation, is essential to maintaining a cohesive remote work atmosphere. To summarize, optimizing cross-functional teams in a remote work environment requires a comprehensive strategy that addresses communication barriers, leverages technology, promotes positive team dynamics, and ensures alignment with organizational goals. Organizations can enhance the productivity and success of their remote product development efforts by adopting efficient methods and proven methodologies. Given the ongoing evolution of remote work, it is important to understand and address these aspects in order to drive innovation and achieve desired outcomes in a virtual work environment.
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597.
Cui, J. (2025). The Explore of Knowledge Management Dynamic Capabilities, AI-Driven Knowledge Sharing, Knowledge-Based Organizational Support, and Organizational Learning on Job Performance: Evidence from Chinese Technological Companies. http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.02468
Drnevich, P. L., & Kriauciunas, A. P. (2011). Clarifying the conditions and limits of the contributions of ordinary and dynamic capabilities to relative firm performance. Strategic management journal, 32(3), 254-279.
Eikelenboom, M., & De Jong, G. (2018, July). The impact of dynamic capabilities on SME sustainable performance. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2018, No. 1, p. 11482). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
Fadli, E. H., shamran, ali abdalrasool, & Kadhim, Z. kamil. (2023). The Effect of dynamic capabilities in improving the performance of educational organizations: Analytical study at the University of Baghdad. Tikrit Journal of Administrative and Economic Sciences, 19(62, 1), 358–373.
Giniuniene, J., & Jurksiene, L. (2015). Dynamic capabilities, innovation and organizational learning: Interrelations and impact on firm performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 985-991.
Johan, Sinaga, P., Pramono, R., & Sudibjo, N. (2021). Innovation Management From Dynamic Capability Management Lense in School Settings: a Conceptual Framework. Jurnal Education and …, 9(4), 468–477.
Malik, A., Milati, E. C., & Faridah, I. (2025). Peran Akreditasi dalam Meningkatkan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan. AKSI: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 3(2), 102–112.
Nimah, I., & Nanik, S. (2022). Manajemen Mutu Pendidikan di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 dan Society 5.0. International Journal Of Disabilities And Social Inclusion (IJODASI), 1(02), 1-9.
Riyadi, S., Lestari, S. D., Faiqoh, D. N., & Sugiarto, D. (2025). Orchestrating Strategic Innovation for Educational Institution Resilience : A Dynamic Capabilities-Based Framework.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
Wahyudi, W. (2021). Peran Pendidik dalam Pembinaan Karakter Peserta didik Menghadapi Era Masyarakat 5.0. JURNAL LENTERA: Kajian Keagamaan, Keilmuan dan Teknologi, 20(01), 115-129.
Zhou, S. S., Zhou, A. J., Feng, J., & Jiang, S. (2019). Dynamic capabilities and organizational performance: The mediating role of innovation. Journal of Management and Organization, 25(5), 731–747. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.201990). Organizational Culture. American Psychologist, 45 (2), 109-119.
