Penerapan ISO 31000 dalam Pengelolaan Risiko untuk Meningkatkan Keselamatan Anak Usia Dini

Authors

  • Laila Ramadhan Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Rugaiyah Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Heru Santosa Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Takdir Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Linda Ika Mayasari Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia

Keywords:

ISO 31000, risk management, child safety, early childhood education

Abstract

Ensuring early childhood safety requires a structured and measurable risk management approach. ISO 31000:2018 provides a universal framework to guide the systematic processes of risk identification, analysis, evaluation, and treatment. This study aims to review the application of ISO 31000 across various sectors and synthesize its relevance, adaptability, and potential contributions to strengthening safety risk management in Early Childhood Education (ECE) institutions. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted using the PRISMA protocol. A total of 404 articles published between 2015 and 2025 were identified from Scopus and Google Scholar. The selection process involved four stages: identification, duplicate removal, eligibility screening, and final inclusion, resulting in 138 articles that met the criteria related to ISO 31000 implementation. The analysis was performed through thematic coding aligned with ISO 31000 components: risk identification, risk analysis, risk evaluation, risk treatment, communication, and monitoring and review. The SLR findings reveal five major patterns of ISO 31000 implementation: (1) systematic identification of physical, environmental, operational, and human-factor risks; (2) risk analysis using likelihood–severity matrices; (3) risk treatment through technical controls, procedural measures, and emergency preparedness; (4) strengthened risk communication with stakeholders; and (5) continuous monitoring through audits and performance indicators. Although the reviewed studies originate from industrial, health, environmental, and educational sectors, their principles demonstrate strong adaptability for enhancing safety practices in ECE settings. This review provides a solid conceptual foundation for adopting ISO 31000 within early childhood institutions. Nonetheless, limitations arise from the scarcity of empirical studies explicitly applying ISO 31000 to ECE contexts, highlighting the need for further research involving model trials, procedural adaptations, and risk management training for ECE educators.

References

Abbasabadi-Arab, M., Mosadeghrad, A. M., & Asgari, N. (2022). Comprehensive evaluation of disaster risk management standards in the Iranian hospitals. Journal of Military Medicine, 24(4), 1231–1240. https://doi.org/10.30491/JMM.24.4.1231

Agrawal, V. (2016). Towards the ontology of ISO/IEC 27005:2011 risk management standard. In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Human Aspects of Information Security and Assurance (pp. 101–111). https://doi.org/10.1109/HAISA.2016

Agrawal, V. (2017). A framework for the information classification in ISO 27005 standard. In Proceedings—4th IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing (pp. 264–269). https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCloud.2017.13

Akkiyat, I., & Souissi, N. (2019). Modelling risk management process according to ISO standard. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2), 5830–5835. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B3751.078219

Alijoyo, A., & Fisabilillah, A. F. M. S. (2021). Risk management implementation in public sector organizations: A case study of Indonesia. Organizational Cultures, 22(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-8013

Almeida, R., Teixeira, J. M., Mira da Silva, M., & Faroleiro, P. (2019). A conceptual model for enterprise risk management. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 32(5), 843–868. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-05-2018-0097

Aven, T. (2017). The flaws of the ISO 31000 conceptualisation of risk. Journal of Risk and Reliability, 231(5), 467–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X17690672

Aven, T., & Ylönen, M. (2019). The strong power of standards in the safety and risk fields: A threat to proper developments of these fields? Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 189, 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.04.035

Björnsdóttir, S. H., Jensson, P., de Boer, R. J., & Thorsteinsson, S. E. (2022). The importance of risk management: What is missing in ISO standards? Risk Analysis, 42(4), 659–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13803

Carolfox. (2019). Understanding the new ISO and COSO updates. Risk Management. https://www.rmmagazine.com

Choo, B. S. Y. (2015). Pragmatic adaptation of ISO 31000:2009 enterprise risk management framework in a high-tech organization using Six Sigma. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 23(4), 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-12-2014-0079

de Oliveira, U. R., Marins, F. A. S., Rocha, H. M., & Salomon, V. A. P. (2017). The ISO 31000 standard in supply chain risk management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 151, 616–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.054

Dzobelova, V., Yablochnikov, S., Makhiboroda, M., Manukhina, L., & Vedyashova, A. (2023). International models of risk management: FERMA, COSO and ISO. Reliability: Theory and Applications, 18(SI5), 172–177. https://doi.org/10.24412/1932-2321

Efe, A. (2023). A comparison of key risk management frameworks: COSO-ERM, NIST RMF, ISO 31000, COBIT. Denetim ve Güvence Hizmetleri Dergisi, 3(2), 185–205.

Elly, E., Hanes, H., & Joosten, J. (2022). ISO 31000:2018-based IT infrastructure risk management study. Jurnal Riset Informatika, 5(1), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.34288/jri.v5i1.448

Erlika, Y., Herdiansyah, M. I., & Mirza, A. H. (2020). Analisis IT risk management menggunakan ISO 31000. Jurnal Ilmiah Informatika Global, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.36982/jiig.v11i1.1073

Fazzino, L., & Jones, B. A. (2020). Risk analysis: National and international standards. In Encyclopedia of Security and Emergency Management. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69891-5_237-1

Febiyanti, H., Yuniar, D. C., Yiharodiyah, L., & Anwar, S. (2024). Implementation of risk management with the ISO 31000 approach in improving educational service performance. JMKSP, 9(1), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.31851/jmksp.v9i1.13668

Govender, D. (2019). The use of the risk management model ISO 31000 by private security companies in South Africa. Security Journal, 32(3), 218–235. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-018-0158-x

Haddad, H., & Laghzaoui, F. (2020). Review of risk management standards: Convergences and divergences. Moroccan Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 2(1), 71–82.

Hardjomidjojo, H., Pranata, C., & Baigorria, G. (2022). Rapid assessment model on risk management based on ISO 31000:2018. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1063(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1063/1/012043

ISO. (2018). The new ISO 31000 keeps risk management simple. International Organisation for Standardization.

Jatmiko, D. P., Setyowati, A. H., & Putra, Y. (2022). Relationship between SNI ISO 31000:2018 and other standard documents. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 118–124. https://doi.org/10.54660/anfo.2022.3.4.3

Kapsa, K. (2018). Risk management in biogas plants based on ISO 31000:2018. Transport Economics and Logistics, 77, 59–72. https://doi.org/10.26881/etil.2018.77.06

Makajić-Nikolić, D. (2023). ISO 31000: Risk management guidelines. In Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management. Springer.

Muzaimi, H., Chew, B. C., & Hamid, S. R. (2017). Integrated management system: The integration of ISO 9001, ISO 14001, OHSAS 18001 and ISO 31000. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1818. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4976898

Olechowski, A., Oehmen, J., Seering, W., & Ben-Daya, M. (2016). The professionalization of risk management: What role can ISO 31000 risk management principles play? International Journal of Project Management, 34(8), 1568–1578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08.002

Parviainen, T., Goerlandt, F., Helle, I., Haapasaari, P., & Kuikka, S. (2021). Implementing Bayesian networks for ISO 31000-based maritime oil spill risk management. Journal of Environmental Management, 278, 111520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111520

Proenca, D., Estevens, J., Vieira, R., & Borbinha, J. (2017). Risk management: A maturity model based on ISO 31000. Proceedings—2017 IEEE Conference on Business Informatics, 1, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2017.40

Setyadi, R., & Anwar, T. (2024). Risk management analysis on a railway electric train using ISO 31000:2018. CITSM 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/CITSM64103.2024.10775624

Wicaksono, A. Y. (2020). Applying ISO 31000:2018 as risk management strategy on heavy machinery vehicle division. International Journal of Science, Engineering, and Information Technology, 4(2), 198–202. https://doi.org/10.21107/ijseit.v4i2.6871

Widianti, T., Firdaus, H., & Rakhmawati, T. (2024). Mapping the landscape: A bibliometric analysis of ISO 31000. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 41(7), 1783–1810. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-09-2023-0287

Yuwono, M. A., & Ellitan, L. (2023). Enhancing company performance through risk governance evaluation based on ERM ISO 31000:2018. IC-EMBus, 1(1), 2030–2040.

Ząbek, J. (2019). The role of organizational leadership in risk management according to ISO 31000:2018. Scientific Journals of the Małopolska University of Economics in Tarnów, 43(3), 117–156. https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/416087.pdf

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Ramadhan, L., Rugaiyah, R., Santosa, H., Takdir, M., & Mayasari, L. I. (2025). Penerapan ISO 31000 dalam Pengelolaan Risiko untuk Meningkatkan Keselamatan Anak Usia Dini. Proceeding of Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Jakarta, 3(1), 535–537. Retrieved from https://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/semnas-ps/article/view/63698

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.