Effectiveness of argument-driven inquiry (ADI) learning model on students' creative thinking skill: Environmental pollution

Authors

  • Inas Nuha Afifa Biology Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
  • Neni Hasnunidah Biology Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
  • Dina Maulina Biology Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lampung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.17316

Keywords:

Argument-driven inquiry, Creative thinking skill, Environmental pollution

Abstract

ADI learning model supports the syntax of the learning process through investigative activities of environmental pollution problems and their impact on the ecosystem. The model implements practicum to challenge students' creativity in presenting the results of practicum through students' arguments. The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of the ADI learning model and evaluate the students' creative thinking skills. This was a quasi-experiment study with a pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. The sample was taken with cluster random sampling technique, 42 students were divided into 2 classes in 7th junior high school at Global Madani School, Bandar Lampung. Results were analyzed using covariance analysis and the effect size was measured by the partial eta-squared value. Aspects of creative thinking skills that were measured: fluency, flexibility, originality, elaboration, and metaphorical thinking. The result shows the application of the ADI learning model had a significant effect in improving students' creative thinking skills with a significance value of 0.013 (sig.<0.05). The effect of implementing the ADI learning model had high effectiveness in improving the students' creative thinking skills with a partial eta squared value of 0.147 which was categorized as large (sig ≥ 0.14). Therefore, the ADI learning model affects improving students 'creative thinking and had an impact on high effectiveness in improving students' creative thinking. Finally, the learning model is recommended for Biology teachers to increase students' creative thinking skills effectively.

References

Afifah, DN, Yulianawati, D, Agustina, N, Lestari, RDS, & Nugraha, MG 2015, ‘Metode sederhana menentukan percepatan gravitasi bumi menggunakan aplikasi tracker pada gerak parabola sebagai media dalam pembelajaran fisika SMA’, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Sains 2015.

Afriyanto, E 2015, ‘Pengembangan media pembelajaran alat peraga pada materi hukum biot savart di SMAN 1 Prambanan Klaten’, JRKPF: Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 2, no.1, pp. 20-4.

Ayop, SK 2017, ‘Analyzing impulse using iPhone and tracker’, The Physics Teacher, vol. 55, no. 8, p. 480.

Besson, U, Borghi, L, De Ambrosis, A, & Mascheretti, P 2007, ‘How to teach friction: Experiments and models’, American Journal of Physics, vol. 75, no. 12, pp. 1106-13.

Cáceres, J & Martínez, E 2015, ‘Utilización del plano inclinado para determinar la aceleración de gravedad’, Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 3502.1-5.

Chanpichai, N & Wattanakasiwich, P 2010, ‘Teaching physics with basketball’, AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1263, no. 1, pp. 212-5.

Eager, D, Pendrill, AM, & Reistad, N 2016, ‘Beyond velocity and acceleration: jerk, snap and higher derivatives’, European Journal of Physics, vol. 37, no. 6, p. 065008.

Halliday, D., Resnick, R., & Walker, J 2010, Fisika Dasar Edisi 7 Jilid 1, Erlangga, Jakarta.

Haris, V & Lizelwati, N 2017, ‘Pembuatan set eksperimen untuk menentukan koefisien kinetik dan koefisien restitusi’, Sainstek: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 38-49.

Hockicko, P, Krišt′ák, LU, & Němec, M 2015, ‘Development of students conceptual thinking by means of video analysis and interactive simulations at technical universities’, European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 145–66.

Hockicko, P, Trpišová, B, & Ondruš, J 2014, ‘‘Correcting students’ misconceptions about automobile braking distances and video analysis using interactive program tracker’, Journal of science education and technology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 763-76.

Kalajian, P 2013, ‘Discrepant results in a 2-d marble collision’, The Physics Teacher, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 173-4.

Li, C 2012, ‘Bowing effect on energy conservation in an incline experiment’, Latin American Journal of Physics Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 43-6.

Mahanal, S & Zubaidah, S 2017, ‘Model pembelajaran Ricosre yang berpotensi memberdayakan keterampilan berpikir kreatif’, Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 676-85.

Marieta, WFD, Rusnayati, H, & Wijaya, AFC 2016, ‘Desain didaktis konsep gradien grafik v (t) sebagai percepatan atau perlambatan berdasarkan hambatan belajar peserta didik kelas X SMA’, Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 105-12.

Mustofa, MH & Rusdiana, D 2016, ‘Profil kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa pada pembelajaran gerak lurus’, Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 15-22.

Paraskeva, F, Bouta, H, & Papagianni, A 2008, ‘Individual characteristics and computer self-efficacy in secondary education teachers to integrate technology in educational practice’, Computers & Education, vol. 50, no. 3, pp.1084-91.

Pattar, U, Raybagkar, VH, & Garg, S 2012, ‘Teaching-learning through innovative experiments: An investigation of students’ responses’, Latin America Journal of Physics Education, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 347–52.

Pili, U & Violanda, R 2019, ‘Using a Lebron James free throw video clip to demonstrate projectile motion and energy conservation’, IOP Science: Physics Education, vol. 54, no. 1, p. 015021.

Rodríguez, CAV & Alberú, MDPS 2017, ‘La experimentación para detonar el interés en la física’, Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 2311-1.

Serevina, V & Muliyati, D 2015, ‘Peningkatan hasil belajar siswa pada materi dinamika gerak partikel dengan menerapkan model pembelajaran project based learning’, Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 61-8.

Suwanpayak, N, Sutthiyan, S, Kulsirirat, K, Srisongkram, P, Teeka, C, & Buranasiri, P 2018, ‘A comparison of gravitational acceleration measurement methods for undergraduate experiment’, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1144, no. 1, p. 012001.

Vera, F, Rivera, R, & Fuentes, R 2013, ‘Learning physics with video analysis’, Nuevas Ideas en Informatica Educativa TISE, vol. 9, pp. 121-25.

Wantoro, K, Sudjito, DN, & Rondonuwu, FS 2016, ‘Pemanfaatan kamera smartphone dan eyetracking analysis pada percobaan kinematika di atas landasan udara dua dimensi’, Unnes Science Education Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 1191.

Wee, LK, Chew, C, Goh, GH, Tan, S, & Lee, TL 2012, ‘Using tracker as a pedagogical tool for understanding projectile motion’, IOP Science: Physics Education, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 448–55.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-25

How to Cite

Afifa, I. N., Hasnunidah, N., & Maulina, D. (2021). Effectiveness of argument-driven inquiry (ADI) learning model on students’ creative thinking skill: Environmental pollution. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.17316