The Response of Class X IPA SMAN 3 Muaro Jambi Students to the Application of the Jigsaw-Type Cooperative Learning Model in Physics Learning

Authors

  • Astalini Astalini Physics Education, Jambi University, J l. Lintas Sumatra Jl. Jambi - Muara Bulian No.Km. 15, Mendalo Darat, Kec. Jambi Outer City, Muaro Jambi Regency, Jambi 36122, Indonesia
  • Dwi Agus Kurniawan Physics Education, Jambi University, J l. Lintas Sumatra Jl. Jambi - Muara Bulian No.Km. 15, Mendalo Darat, Kec. Jambi Outer City, Muaro Jambi Regency, Jambi 36122, Indonesia
  • Darmaji Darmaji Physics Education, Jambi University, J l. Lintas Sumatra Jl. Jambi - Muara Bulian No.Km. 15, Mendalo Darat, Kec. Jambi Outer City, Muaro Jambi Regency, Jambi 36122, Indonesia
  • Erika Erika Physics Education, Jambi University, J l. Lintas Sumatra Jl. Jambi - Muara Bulian No.Km. 15, Mendalo Darat, Kec. Jambi Outer City, Muaro Jambi Regency, Jambi 36122, Indonesia
  • Riko Riko Physics Education, Jambi University, J l. Lintas Sumatra Jl. Jambi - Muara Bulian No.Km. 15, Mendalo Darat, Kec. Jambi Outer City, Muaro Jambi Regency, Jambi 36122, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/1.07204

Keywords:

cooperative models, jigsaw, physics learning

Abstract

Generally, the learning model used in physics learning is the lecture learning model. The use of a suitable learning model can undoubtedly attract the interest and attention of students. The novelty of this research is the implementation or application of the jigsaw cooperative learning model to determine the students 'responses to the Jigsaw cooperative learning model. This study aims to describe the students' responses to the application of the jigsaw cooperative learning model in physics subjects. The method used is the mixing method (mixture). Quantitative data is obtained by collecting data in the form of a questionnaire. Qualitative data were obtained using an interview instrument sheet. The results showed that 65% (13 of 20 students) responded quite well, and 35% (7 of 20 students) responded well to applying the jigsaw cooperative learning model in physics lessons.

References

Abdullah, R 2017, ‘Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw Pada Mata Pelajaran Kimia Di Madrasah Aliyah’, Lantanida Journal, vol. 5, no.1, pp. 13-28.
Astalini, A, Kurniawan, DA & Sumaryanti, S 2018, ‘Sikap siswa terhadap pelajaran fisika di sman kabupaten Batanghari’, JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 59-64.
Astalini, A, Kurniawan, DA, Perdana, R & Pathoni, H 2019, ‘Identifikasi Sikap Peserta Didik terhadap Mata Pelajaran Fisika di Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri 5 Kota Jambi’, UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 34-43.
Astuti, SP 2015, ‘Pengaruh kemampuan awal dan minat belajar terhadap prestasi belajar fisika’, Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, vol. 5, no. 1.
Axinn, WG & Pearce, LD 2006, ‘Mixed-Method Data Collection Strategie’, United States of America: Cambridge University Pres.
Devi, DS 2012, ‘Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Pada Pembelajaran IPA Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 5 Sleman’.
Dewi, RK, Asrial, A & Hariyadi, B 2015, ‘Pengaruh Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Group Investigasi Bermedia dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Biologi’, Edu-Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Universitas Jember, vol. 4, no. 1.
Farhan, A, Herliana, F, Evendi, E, Devy, NK & Mauliza, F 2021 ‘The Implementation of ‘Guru Penggerak’ (Organizer Teachers) Concept to Innovation of The Discussion Methods in Thermodynamics Course’, Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1 - 12.
Gašević D, Joksimović S, Eagan BR, & Shaffer DW 2019 ‘SENS: network analytics to combine social and cognitive perspectives of collaborative learning’, Comput Hum Behav. vol. 92, pp. 562–577.
Hadi, S & Kasum, MU 2015, ‘Pemahaman konsep matematika siswa SMP melalui penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe memeriksa berpasangan (Pair Checks)’, EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 3, no. 1.
Haftador, AM, Shirazi, F & Mohebbi, Z 2021 ‘Online class or flipped-jigsaw learning? Which one promotes academic motivation during the COVID-19 pandemic?’ BMC Med Educ, vol. 21, pp. 499
Isjoni 2011, ‘Cooperative Learning Efektivitas Pembelajaran Kelompok’, Bandung: Alfabeta.
Istijanto 2005, ‘Riset Sumber Daya Manusia, Cara Praktis Mendeteksi Dimensi- Dimensi Kerja karyawan’, PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
Kunandar 2011, ‘Guru Profesional Implementasi Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP) dan Sukses dalam Sertifikasi Guru’, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Kurniawan, DA, Perdana, R & Kurniasari, D 2018, ‘Identification of Student Attitudes toward Physics Learning at Batanghari District High School’, The Educational Review, USA, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 475-484.
Majid, A 2014, ‘Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya’.
Much, I, Subroto, I, Farisa, S & Haviana, C 2016, ‘Sistem Informasi Angket Pengukuran Skala Kebutuhan Materi Pembelajaran Tambahan Sebagai Pendukung Pengambilan Keputusan Di Sekolah Menengah Atas Menggunakan Skala Likert’, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1-12.
Mustamiin, MZ 2016, ‘Pengaruh Penggunaan Model Kooperatif Learning Tipe Jigsaw Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPS Di Tinjau Dari Motivasi Berpretasi’, Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 65-76.
Pujiasri, D 2018, ‘Tanggapan Peserta Didik Terhadap Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Teknik Jigsaw Pada Permainan Bola Besar’, Pendidikan Jasmani Kesehatan dan Rekreasi, vol. 7, no. 5.
Putri, AR, Maison, M & Darmaji, D, 2018, ‘Kerjasama Dan Kekompakan Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Di Kelas Xi Mipa Sma Negeri 3 Kota Jambi’, EduFisika: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 32-40.
Rachim, DK N 2020 ‘Study of The Lazy Nature of Physics Students Using The Quadratic Optimal Control Method’, Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 279 - 288.
Rachmawan, S, Suyitno, H & Agoestanto, A 2013, ‘Penerapan Jigsaw II dan Student Teams Achievement Divisions Berbantuan Alat Peraga’, Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 26-33.
Rahman, A, Ahmar, A & Rusli, R. 2016, ‘The influence of cooperative learning models on learning outcomes based on students learning styles’, World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 3.
Rusman 2013, ‘Model-model Pembelajaran’, Bandung: Media Mandiri Pers.
Sobur, Alex 2003, ‘Psikologi Umum’, Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Sudana, IPA & Wesnawa, IGA 2017, ‘Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA’, Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-8.
Trisianawati, E, Djudin, T & Setiawan, R 2016, ‘Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada materi v’ektor di kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Sanggau Ledo’, Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 51-60.
Tsivitanidou, OE, Georgiou, Y & Ioannou A 2021 ‘A Learning Experience in Inquiry-Based Physics with Immersive Virtual Reality: Student Perceptions and an Interaction Effect Between Conceptual Gains and Attitudinal Profiles’, J Sci Educ Technol, vol. 30, pp. 841–861.
Vanslambrouck, S, Zhu, C, Lombaerts, K, Philipsen, B, & Tondeur J 2018 ‘Students’ motivation and subjective task value of participating in online and blended learning environments’ Internet High Educ, vol. 36, pp. 33–40.
Zakaria, E and Iksan, Z 2007, ‘Promoting Cooperative Learning in Science and Mathematics Education: A Malaysian Perspective’, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, vol. 3, no. 1 Tahun 2007. pp. 35-39.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

Astalini, A., Kurniawan, D. A., Darmaji, D., Erika, E., & Riko, R. (2021). The Response of Class X IPA SMAN 3 Muaro Jambi Students to the Application of the Jigsaw-Type Cooperative Learning Model in Physics Learning. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 7(2), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.07204

Similar Articles

> >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.