Development of the Physics Practicum Apparatus based on Microcontroller: A Prototype Constructed from Misconceptions of Basic Kinematics Concepts

Endah Nur Syamsiah; Muhammad Rizka Taufani; Adam Hadiana Aminudin; Rahadian Sri Pamungkas; Reno Muhammad Fadilla; Fatih Najah Nabilah

doi:10.21009/1.10213

Authors

Endah Nur Syamsiah Universitas Kebangsaan Republik Indonesia, Jl. Terusan Halimun No.37, Lkr. Sel., Kec. Lengkong, Kota Bandung, Jawa Barat 40263, Indonesia
Muhammad Rizka Taufani Universitas Kebangsaan Republik Indonesia, Jl. Terusan Halimun No.37, Lkr. Sel., Kec. Lengkong, Kota Bandung, Jawa Barat 40263, Indonesia
Adam Hadiana Aminudin Universitas Kebangsaan Republik Indonesia, Jl. Terusan Halimun No.37, Lkr. Sel., Kec. Lengkong, Kota Bandung, Jawa Barat 40263, Indonesia
Rahadian Sri Pamungkas Bandung Creative Society, l. Jalaprang No.4, Sukaluyu, Kec. Cibeunying Kaler, Kota Bandung, Jawa Barat 40123, Indonesia
Reno Muhammad Fadilla Kanazawa University, Kakumamachi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-1192, Japan
Fatih Najah Nabilah Universitas Kebangsaan Republik Indonesia, Jl. Terusan Halimun No.37, Lkr. Sel., Kec. Lengkong, Kota Bandung, Jawa Barat 40263, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21009/1.10213

Keywords:

prototype, misconceptions, basic kinematics, graph, P-PAM

Abstract

Critical thinking skills are fundamental in 21^st-century teaching. This study aims to identify trends in research on critical thinking skills in physics in Indonesia, as reported in journal articles published between 2016 and 2022. This is meta-analysis research using the Prisma model. There were 36 articles that met the selection criteria. We performed the data analysis manually and used VOSviewer software. The indicators used for data analysis include the year, type of research, research subject, topic, treatment, data collection instrument, and the application of data analysis in each article. The analysis of article reviews reveals that the research trend for critical thinking skills in physics in Indonesia has increased, with more publications expected in 2020. Temperature and heat are the physics topics that have become the focus of research. High school students in grade X are the most frequently selected research subjects. Research on physics education typically employs quantitative methods, employs a quasi-experimental design, and utilizes a test as a data collection instrument. The most common method of data analysis in research is the t-test.

References

Admoko, S. (2023). Could Physics Teachers Also Have Misconceptions on Basic Kinematics?. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2623(1), p. 012025.

Ali, R. H., Rahmad, M., Islami, N., & Syafii, M. (2020). Design of Straight Motion Experiment using Electric Motor Ticker Timer Based on Microcontroller. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1655(1), p. 012004.

Anggoro, S., Widodo, A., Suhandi, A., & Treagust, D.F. (2019). Using a Discrepant Event to Facilitate Preservice Elementary Teachers' Conceptual Change about Force and Motion. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(8).

Asrowi, R.H., Budi, E., & Nasbey, H. (2023). Development of the Wimshurst Machine as a Learning Media on Static Electricity Material for Junior High Schools. Current STEAM and Education Research, 1(2), pp. 42-52. doi: doi.org/10.58797/ cser.010201

Baifeto, E.P.F., Samsudin, A., Efendi, R. & Athiyyah, R. (2022). Developing PHYCOM (Physics Comics) on Newton’s Law Material for 10th Grade High School Students. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 8(2), pp.175-192.

Bakri, F., Sani, T.N., & Permana, H. (2023). Physics Textbooks Feature Augmented Reality Technology-Based Media For Kinematics Material: Training 21st Century Skills For High School Students. Current STEAM and Education Research, 1(1), pp. 13-22. doi: doi.org/10.58797/cser.010103

Camburn, B., Vimal, V., Julie, L., David, A., Daniel, J., Richard, C., Kevin, O., & Kristin, W. (2017). "Design prototyping methods: state of the art in strategies, techniques, and guidelines." Design Science 3 (2017): e13.

Candraditya, R., Ningtyas, C.P., Aziz M.R.A., Fadilah, L.S., Maharatri, A.D., & Gibran, A.M. (2024). Understanding Cyclotron Motion: A Visual Approach to Electron Dynamics in Electric and Magnetic Fields. Current STEAM and Education Research, 2(2), pp. 81-88. doi: doi.org/10.58797/cser.020202.

Cashman, A., & O’Mahony, T. (2022). Student understanding of kinematics: a qualitative assessment. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(6), pp. 886-909.

Damayanti, T. & Sinuraya, J. (2023). Analysis of The Utilization of Physics Laboratories in Several High Schools/Islamic Schools in Langkat Regency. Current STEAM and Education Research, 1(1), pp. 23-32. doi: doi.org/10.58797/cser.010104

Darman, D.R., Suhandi, A., Kaniawati, I., & Samsudin, A. (2023). Designing of virtual laboratory on elasticity for Physics learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2596(1), p. 012061.

Doyan, A., Qahfi, B.A., & Susilawati, S. (2023). Determining the Viscosity Coefficient of Fluids Using a Simple Viscosity Practical Tool Aided by Arduino Uno and a Magnetic Sensor. AMPLITUDO: Journal of Science and Technology Innovation, 2(1), pp.34-37.

Ďuriš, V., Vasileva, L.N., Chumarov, S.G., & Trofimova, I.G. (2023). Development of Creative Thinking Skills of Bachelor Engineers Based on STEM Technology. TEM Journal, 12(2).

Fongsamut, K., Tanasittikosol, M., & Phaksunchai, M. (2022). Effectiveness of the simulation-based learning (SBL) assisted with scaffolding approach to address students’ misconceptions about projectile motion. Physics Education, 58(2), p.025002.

Handhika, J., Istiantara, D.T., & Astuti, S.W. (2019). Using graphical presentation to reveals the student’s conception of kinematics. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(3), p. 032064.

Huda, I., Girei, M.M., & Keizi, F. (2023). Development of a Practical Tool for Linear Momentum Collisions Using a Microcontroller. Journal of Educational Technology and Learning Creativity, 1(2), pp.42-49.

Johan, H., Putri, D. H., Risdianto, E., Johan, S., Sudirman, S., & Widiasih, W. (2023). Development of Supplementary Basic Physics Practicum Based on Problem-Solving Method Assisted with Augmented Reality (AR) Technology. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 9(1), pp. 41–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.21009/1.09105

Kondaveeti, H.K., Kumaravelu, N.K., Vanambathina, S.D., Mathe, S.E., & Vappangi, S. (2021). A systematic literature review on prototyping with Arduino: Applications, challenges, advantages, and limitations. Computer Science Review, 40, p.100364.

Kurniawan, F., Samsudin, A., Chandra, D.T., Sriwati, E., & Coştu, B. (2023). IMPAS: Modification of the PAS Questionnaire to Measure Attitudes of High School Students towards Physics in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 5(2), pp. 198-216.

Lin, J., Xing, Y., Hu, Y., Zhang, J., Bao, L., Luo, K., ... & Xiao, Y. (2023). Inhibitory control involvement in overcoming the position-velocity indiscrimination misconception among college physics majors. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(1), p. 010112.

Mane, V. S., Pandharipande, M. M., Joshi, H. J., & Kotalwar, S.S. (2021). Manual, Internet and Bluetooth all-in-one Smart Home (MIB-AIO). In 2021 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Knowledge Economy (ICCIKE) (pp. 187-191). IEEE.

Molotnikov, V. & Molotnikova, A. (2022). Kinematics. In Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (pp. 53-106). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Nasution, R.H., Wijaya, T.T., Putra, M.J.A., & Hermita, N. (2021). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa SD pada materi gaya dan gerak. Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 4(1), pp.11-21.

Putri, A.H., Samsudin, A., & Suhandi, A. (2022). Exhaustive studies before covid-19 pandemic attack of students’ conceptual change in science education: a literature review. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(3).

Rak, F. & Wiora, J. (2021). Comparison of ESP programming platforms. Computer science and information technologies, 2(2), pp. 77-86.

Resbiantoro, G. & Setiani, R. (2022). A review of misconception in physics: the diagnosis, causes, and remediation. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(2).

Rusilowati, A., Susanti, R., Sulistyaningsing, T., Asih, T.S.N., Fiona, E. & Aryani, A. (2021). Identify misconception with multiple choice three tier diagnostik test on newton law material. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(5), p. 052058.

Samsudin, A., et al. (2021). Reconstructing students’ misconceptions on work and energy through the PDEODE* E tasks with think-pair-share. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(1), pp. 118-144.

Samsudin, A., et al. (2023). Identifying Javanese Students' Conceptions on Fluid Pressure with Wright Map Analysis of Rasch. Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 6(2), pp. 173-185.

Sari, N.A., Santyasa, I.W., & Gunadi, I.G.A. (2021). The effect of conceptual change models on students' conceptual understanding in learning physics. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 17(2), pp.94-105.

Setyarini, R. & Admoko, S. (2021). Penerapan strategi pembelajaran konflik kognitif dalam mereduksi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi gelombang bunyi. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 10(3).

Suárez, M., Pandiella, S., & Benegas, J. (2023). Tutorials+ PhET: a simple and efficient active-learning approach for the teaching of kinematics of circular motion in a technically-oriented high school. Physics Education, 58(3), 035005.

Suhandi, A., Samsudin, A., Suhendi, E., Hermita, N., Syamsiah, E.N., & Costu, B. (2020). Facilitating conceptual changes of high school students regarding concepts in static electricity and DC circuits through the use of VMSCDCCText. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), pp.815-822.

Suhandi, A., Surtiana, Y., Husnah, I., Setiawan, W., Siahaan, P., Samsudin, A., & Costu, B. (2020). Fostering High School Students' Misconception about Boiling Concept Using Conceptual Change Laboratory (CCLab) Activity. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(6), pp. 2211-2217.

Sulsilah, H., Hidayat, A., Samsudin, A., & Yoga, P.D. (2022). Developing mobile based activity in learning motion (Moba-Motion): An innovative app. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 2468(1).

Sundaygara, C., Gusi, L.A.R.P., Pratiwi, H.Y., Ayu, H.D., Jufriadi, A., & Hudha, M.N. (2021). Identification students’ misconception using four-tier diagnostic test on Newton Law subject. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1869(1), p. 012157.

Suseno, N., Riswanto, R., Salim, M. B., Hidayatullah, D., & Rasagama, I. G. (2021). How to Manage an Effective Laboratory for Science Learning in Schools?. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 7(2), pp. 191–200. doi: https://doi.org/10.21009/1.07211

Syamsiah, E.N., Maknun, J., Syamsudin, A., Muslim, M., Hasanah, L. & Suhandi, A. (2019). Eleventh grade students’ conception analysis: a case-study on heat transfer. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(5), p. 052066.

Taber, K.S. (2017). The nature of student conceptions in science. In Science education, pp. 119-131. Brill.

Timothy, V. et al., (2023). Fostering Preservice Teachers’ Diagnostic Competence in Identifying Students’ Misconceptions in Physics. Int J of Sci and Math Educ, 21, pp. 1685–1702. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10311-4

Vosniadou, S. (2020). Students’ misconceptions and science education. In Oxford research encyclopedia of education.

Wibowo, F.C., Suhandi, A., Rusdiana, D., Ruhiat, Y., Darman, D.R. & Samsudin, A. (2017). Effectiveness of microscopic virtual simulation (MVS) for conceptualizing students’ conceptions on phase transitions. Advanced Science Letters, 23(2), pp. 839-843.